Attitude Toward Gender Equality Polices: Relations between Gender Egalitarianism, Opposition to Affirmative Action and Perception of the Justice

안상수; 김금미

doi:10.18205/kpa.2008.13.3.004

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.13 No.3

Citation
Share

Attitude Toward Gender Equality Polices: Relations between Gender Egalitarianism, Opposition to Affirmative Action and Perception of the Justice

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726; (E)3058-2083

2008, v.13 no.3, pp.299-324

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2008.13.3.004

& (2008). Attitude Toward Gender Equality Polices: Relations between Gender Egalitarianism, Opposition to Affirmative Action and Perception of the Justice. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 13(3), 299-324, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2008.13.3.004

copy

Abstract

This study examined the attitudes regarding the sex role egalitarianism and the gender equality policies. Especially, this study was to investigate relations between gender egalitarianism, opposition to affirmative action and perception of the justice. This study analyzed the results of 1,522 Korean women(n=506) and men(n=1016). According to results, women, younger aged group, more educations group and urban dwellers showed more favorable attitude toward the sex role egalitarianism than man, old aged group, low educational group and rural dwellers. But, the sex difference in the attitude toward sex role egalitarianism was to greater the younger aged group than the old aged group. Results of the analysis of the attitude regarding gender equality policies suggested that women showed more favorable attitudes than man. The results of the multiple regression mediation analysis demonstrated that people's prejudice level was positively associated with opposition toward affirmative action policies. Moreover, the prejudice was partially mediated through the justice based opposition. The significance, implications, and limitations of these findings were discussed and topics to be investigated in the future study were mentioned.

keywords: women, gender equality, gender egalitarianism, affirmative action, gender partnership, 성평등, 성평등의식, 적극적 조치, 성평등 정책, 공정성, 젠더파트너십

Reference

김양희․이수연 (2002). 청소년용 한국형남녀평등의식검사 개발. 한국여성개발원 연구보고서, 02-250-5.

김양희․정경아 (1999). 한국형남녀평등의식검사 개발. 한국여성개발원 연구보고서, 99-250-4.

민무숙․이수연․박영도․이준일 (2004). 국민통합을 위한 차별 해소 방안. 인문사회연구회 협동연구총서 2004-01.

안상수 (2007). 군가산점제 부활 논쟁과 남성의 의식. 페미니즘연구, 7, 321-349.

여성부 (2002). 제2차 여성정책기본계획 추진방향 및 정책과제연구.

여성부 (2004). 2003 여성백서.

정진경 (1990). 한국성역할검사(KSRI). 한국심리학회지: 사회, 5, 82-91.

Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward and understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advance in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.

10.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

11.

Bobocel, D. R., Son Hing, L. S., Davey, L M., Stanley, D. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1998). Justice-based opposition to social policies: Is it genuine? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 653-669.

12.

Davey, L. M., Bobocel, D. R., Son Hing, L. S., & Zanna, M. P. (1999). Preference for the Merit Principle Scale: An individual difference measure of distributive justice preferences. Social Justice Research, 12, 223-240.

13.

Harrison, D. A., Kravitz, D. A., Mayer, D. M., Leslie, L. M., & Lev-Arey, D. (2006). Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action program in employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1013-1036.

14.

Hernes, H. (1987). Welfare state and woman power: Essays in state feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

15.

Kaufman, M (2004). Transforming our interventions for gender equality by addressing and involving men and boys : a framework for analysis and action, in S. Ruxton (Ed.), Gender Equality and Men: Learning from practice. Oxfam GB.

16.

Kleinpenning, G., & Hagendoorn, L. (1993). Forms of racism and the cumulative dimension of ethnic attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 21-36.

17.

Kravitz, D. A., Harrison, D. A., Turner, M. E., Levine, E. L., Chaves, W., Brannick, M. T., Denning, D. L., Russell, C. J., & Conrad, M. A. (1997). Affirmative action: A review of psychological and behavioral research. Bowling Green, Oh: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

18.

Kravitz, D. A., & Platania, J. (1993). Attitudes and beliefs about race based affirmative action: Effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 928-938.

19.

Nosworthy, G. J., Lea, J. A., Lindsay, R. C. L. (1995). Opposition to affirmative action: Racial affect and traditional value predictors across four programs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 314-337.

20.

Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490.

21.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations(2nd ed, 7-24) Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

22.

Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

23.

Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neo-sexism: Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 842-849.

24.

UNESCO (1999). Partnership is Power : Women and Men for Gender Equality

25.

WEF (2007). The Global Gender Gap Index report 2007. World Economic Forum, Genova Switzerland.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.13 No.3

Attitude Toward Gender Equality Polices: Relations between Gender Egalitarianism, Opposition to Affirmative Action and Perception of the Justice

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology