바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology

메뉴
search

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.14 No.4

A Study between female students in college of engineering and humanities by sex role identity, self efficacy and career maturity




The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726; (E)3058-2083
2009, v.14 no.4, pp.497-514
https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2009.14.4.001
& (2009). A Study between female students in college of engineering and humanities by sex role identity, self efficacy and career maturity. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 14(4), 497-514, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2009.14.4.001

Abstract

Because female students are affected by sex greatly, more studies for non-traditional career choice women are needed. Most people considered engineering career as nontraditional career choice for women, whereas humanities as traditional career choice for women. Therefore, this study explored the differences between female students in college of engineering and those in college of humanities. 101 female students in college of engineering and 100 female students in college of humanities participated in this study. The survey included sex role identity, career decision, career preparation, self efficacy, and some demographic items. The results showed as follow. First, engineering students had higher masculinity than humanities students. Second, there were no significant differences in career decision and career preparation between engineering students and humanities students. Third, there were no differences on parent's educational levels whereas there were slight differences of father's majors between engineering students and humanities students. Fourth, there were differences between engineering students and humanities students with the effects of masculinity and self efficacy on career maturity. fifth, the results supported the hypotheses that majors would moderate the relationship between self efficacy and career maturity. In humanities students, self efficacy exerted significant effect on career decision, while in engineering students, self efficacy had strong effect on career preparation. Finally, limitations and suggestions for future research were discussed.

keywords
공학계 여대생, 인문계 여대생, 성역할 정체감, 진로결정, 진로준비, 자기효능감, female students in college of engineering, sex role identity, career decision, career preparation, self efficacy

Reference

1.

김득란 (1992). 양성적 남녀의 성역할 반응양식과 관련 변인 분석. 성균관대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

2.

김정자 외 (1998). 여성과학기술 인력 개발을 위한 정책과제: 이공계 여대생의 교육경험 분석에 기초하여. 한국과학재단.

3.

모혜정, 이재경 외 (1995). 여성공학 교육 및 인력활용에 관한 연구. 과학기술정책 관리소.

4.

민무숙, 이정희, 송현주 (2002). 공학분야 여성 고급 인적자원 개발 지원방안. 한국여성개발원.

5.

유계식, 이재창 (1997). 대학생의 성공공포와 성취동기 및 성역할 정체감이 진로결정에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담과 심리치료, 9(1), 259-288.

6.

이기학 (1997). 고등학생의 진로태도성숙과 심리적 변인들과의 관계. 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

7.

임용자 (1994). 성역할 관련요인이 여대생의 진로결정에 미치는 영향. 진로교육연구, 2, 57-79.

8.

탁진국 (1996) 경력미결정과 부적응간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 9(2), 81-94.

9.

한정신(1991). 한국대학생 문제진단검사 개발연구. 숙명여자대학교 학생생활지도연구소. 학생생활연구. 17, 1-53.

10.

Adams, C. H., & Sherer, M. (1985). Sex role orientations and psychological adjustment: Implications for the masculinity model. Sex Roles, 12, 121-128.

11.

Almquist, E. M., & Angrist, S.(1970). Career salience atypicality of occupational choice among college women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 242-249.

12.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy; Toward a unifying of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

13.

Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.

14.

Betz, N. E. (2005). Handbook of career counseling for women. Routledge.

15.

Betz, N. E., Heesacker, R. S., & Shuttleworth, S. C. (1990). Moderators of the congruence and realism of major occupational plans in college students: A replication and extension. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 269-276.

16.

Betz, N. E. & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1987). The career psychology of women, Academic Press, San Diego.

17.

Carter, R., Kirkup, G. (1990). Women in engineering. London: MacMillian Education Ltd. Cockburn..

18.

Chusmir, L. H. (1983). Characteristics and predictive dimensions of women who make nontraditional vocational choices. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 62. 43-47.

19.

Chusmir, L. H. (1990). Men who make nontraditional career choices. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 11-16.

20.

Fassinger, R. E. (1996). Notes from the Margins: Integrating Lesbian Experience into the Vocational Psychology of Women, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48(2), 160-175.

21.

Fitzerald, J. F., & Harmon, I. W. (2001). Women's career development: A postmodern update. In F. T. I. Leong & A. Barak(Eds). Contemporary models in vocational psychology(p.207-230), Mahwah, NJ; Erlbaum.

22.

Gist, M. E., & Mitechell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211

23.

Gottfredson, G. D. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A development theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545-579.

24.

Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). Self efficacy to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326-339.

25.

Hetherington, C., & Orzek, A. (1989). Career Counseling and Life Planning with Lesbian Women. Journal of Counseling and development, 68(1), 52-57.

26.

Holland. J. L. (1985). College Majors Finder, Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa.

27.

Larry, L L., Gregory, T. M., & Ronald, L. O. (1998). Women and minorities in science and engineering. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(3), 239-276.

28.

Luzzo, D. A., & McWhirter, E. H. (2001). Sex and Ethnic Differences in the Perception of Educational and Career-Related Barriers and Levels of Coping Efficacy. Journal of Counseling &Development, 79(1), 61-67.

29.

Matsui, T. (1994). Mechanisms underlying sex differences in Career Self-Efficacy Expectations of University Students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(2), 177-184.

30.

Mau, W. C., Dominick, M., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Characteristics of female students who aspire to science and engineering or homemaking occupations. The Career Development Quarterly, 43(4). 323-337.

31.

McKenna, A. E. & Ferrero, G. W. (1991). Ninth-Grade Students' Attitudes Toward Nontraditional Occupations. Career Development Quarterly, 40, 168-181.

32.

Murrell, A. J., Frieze, I. H., & Frost, J. L. (1991). Aspiring to career in male- and female- dominated professions: a study of black and white college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 103-126.

33.

Orcutt, M. A., & Walsh, W. B. (1979). Traditionality and congruence of career aspirations for college women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 1-11.

34.

Rojewski, J. W. (1994). Career indecision types for rural adolescents from disadvantaged and nondisadvantaged backgrounds. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 41(3), 356-363.

35.

Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psycholigy, 19, 48-58

36.

Seymour, E., & Hewitt, E. (1997). Talking About Leaving: Factors Contributing to High Attrition Rates Among Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Undergraduate Majors. Boulder, CO: Bureau of Sociological Research

37.

Sherer M, Maddux J. E, Mercandante B, Prentice Dunn S, Jacobs, B, Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.

38.

Swanson, J. L., & Tokar, D. M. (1991). College students' perception of barriers to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 92-106.

39.

Silver, W. S. Mitchell, T. R. & Gist, M. E. (1995). Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 286-299.

40.

Whitley. B. E. (1983). Sex-role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765-778.

41.

Wolfe, L. K., & Betz, N. E. (1981). Traditionality of choice and sex-role identification as moderators of the congruence of occupational choice in college women. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 18, 43-55

42.

Swanson, J. L., & Tokar, D. M. (1991). College students' perception of barriers to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 92-106.

43.

Yanico, B. J., & Hardin, S. I., &. McLaughlin, K. B. (1978). Androgyny and traditional versus nontraditional major choice among college freshmen. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 12, 261-269.

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology

e-Submission
OA Policy
KOREAN