바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology

메뉴
search

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.14 No.4

Characteristics of Item Responses of Statement Validity Analysis of Sexually Molested Children



The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726; (E)3058-2083
2009, v.14 no.4, pp.591-616
https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2009.14.4.006
& (2009). Characteristics of Item Responses of Statement Validity Analysis of Sexually Molested Children. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 14(4), 591-616, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2009.14.4.006

Abstract

This study analyzed fifty child molestation cases reported in five one-stop centers from March to August in 2009. Among statement validity tests for child victims, scales including Criterion Based Content Analysis, Reality Monitoring, Contextual Evaluation, Behavioral Change, Validity Evaluation were analyzed. For item analysis, Item Response Theory was applied to produce difficulty and differentiation indices after consideration internal consistency among items for each scale. Results presented all items except three items to have fair differentiation function. However, power was not enough because of a small sample size. This problem should be solved on further researches.

keywords
진술타당성분석도구, 내적 합치도, 문항반응이론, 문항특성곡선, Statement Validity Test, Internal Consistency, Item Response Theory, Item Characteristic Curve

Reference

1.

김지선, 박지선, 최수형 (2009). 청소년대상 성범죄자 유형 분류와 프로파일링. 보건복지부 의뢰 미발표연구, 한국형사정책연구원.

2.

김현정 (2010). 성폭력피해아동의 진술분석 도구의 상대적 유용성 비교연구. 경기대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

3.

민유숙 (2009). 아동피해자진술의 평가에 관한 법원의 관점. 범죄심리사자격관리위원회 공동심포지움 발표논문집, 49-60.

4.

아동피해자조사매뉴얼 (2009). 2009년도 진술분석전문가 교육 자료집. 경기대학교 범죄심리학과.

5.

이수정 (2009). 아동 대상 성범죄 조사절차의 미비점 및 개선방안 연구: 진술타당성분석(Statement Validit Analysis)의 형사사법적 활용가능성, 한국경찰연구, 8(3)호, 141-172.

6.

Coy v. Iowa, 56 U.S.L.W. 191 (1988).

7.

Faller, K. C. (2007). Interviewing Children About Sexual Abuse, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

8.

Gabora, N. J., Spanos, N. P., & Joab, A. (1993). The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial, Law and Human Behavior, 17, 103-119.

9.

Gibbons, R. D., Immekus, J. C., & Bock, R. D. (2007). The Added Value of Multidimensional IRT Models, Didactic Workbook.

10.

Hagman, B. T., Kuerbis, A. N., Morgenstern, J., Bux, D. A., Parsons, J. T., & Heidinger, B. E. (2009). An Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis of the short Inventory of Problems- Alcohol and Drugs (SIP-AD) among non-treatment seeking men-who-have-sex -with-men: Evidence for a shortened 10-item SIP-AD, Addictive Behaviors, 34, 948-954.

11.

Heger, A. H., Emans, S. J., & Muram, D. (1999). Evaluation of the Sexually Abused Child, 2nd, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Kovera, M. B., Gresham, A. W., Borgida, E., & Gray, E. (1997). Does Expert Psychological Testimony Inform of Influence Juror Decision Making? A Social Cognitive Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 178-191.

13.

Malloy, L. C., Lyon, T. D., & Quas, J. A. (2007). Filial Dependency and Recantation of Child Sexual Abuse Allegations. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 162-170.

14.

McGouth, L. (1995). For the record: Videotaping investigative interviews. Psychology, Public Policy, and Low, 1, 370-386.

15.

Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus, Mplus web notes: No. 4, Version 5.

16.

Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2007). Mplus User's Guide, 5th, Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

17.

Myers, J. E. B. (1998). Forensic Impact of the Child Sexual Abuse Medical Examination. Child abuse & neglect, 22, 653-656

18.

Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient Alpha and Related Internal Consistency Reliability Coefficients. Psychological Methods, 5, 343-355.

19.

Pipe, M. E., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2004). Recent research on children's testimony about experienced and witnessed events. Developmental Review, 24, 440-468.

20.

Quas, J., DeCicco, V., Bulkley, J., & Goodman, G. (1996, Spring/Summer). District attorney's views of legal innovations for child witnesses. APLS News, pp.7-12.

21.

Raskin, D. C., & Esplin, P. W. (1991). Statement Validity Assessment: Interview Procedures and Content Analysis of Children's Statements of Sexual Abuse. Behavior Assessment, 13, 265-291.

22.

Reise, S. P., Ainsworth, A. T., & Haviland, M. G. (2005). Item Response Theory: Fundamentals, Applications, and Promise in Psychological Research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 95-101.

23.

Ross, D. F., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Marsil, D. F. (1999). The Impact of Hearsay Testimony on Conviction Rates in Trials of Child Sexual Abuse: Toward Balancing the Rights of Defendants and Child Witnesses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 439-455.

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology

e-Submission
OA Policy
KOREAN