바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

한국판 이성관계 간섭행동척도의 타당화 연구

Validity of the Korean Intrusiveness Scale in Romantic Relationships

초록

본 연구에서는 한국판 이성관계 간섭행동척도(Korean Intrusiveness Scale in Romantic Relationships)의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 이성교제중인 228명의 남녀 대학생을 대상으로 한국판 이성관계 간섭행동척도, 성인애착척도, 집착행동척도, 편집행동척도, 이성관계 만족도척도를 실시하였다. 원래 이성관계 간섭행동척도는 자신의 간섭행동을 측정하는 38문항과 파트너의 간섭행동에 대한 지각을 측정하는 38문항으로 구성되어 있다. 본 연구에서는 요인분석을 통하여 자신의 간섭행동과 파트너의 간섭행동의 요인이 일치하는 각 32문항을 선정하였다. 요인분석 결과, ‘통제’, ‘과도한 애정표현’, ‘일방적 행위’ 및 ‘사생활 침범’의 4개 요인이 추출되었고, 각 요인의 내적 합치도계수가 비교적 우수한 편으로 내적일관성이 있음을 보여 주었다. 간섭행동척도의 수렴타당도를 확인한 결과, 성인애착척도, 집착행동척도, 편집행동척도, 그리고 이성관계 만족도와 관련성을 보였다. 아울러 연구의 제한점과 후속연구에 대한 시사점에 대하여 논의하였다.

keywords
Korean Intrusiveness Scale in Romantic Relationships, limerence, paranoia, attachment, romantic relationship satisfaction, reliability, validity, Korean Intrusiveness Scale in Romantic Relationships, limerence, paranoia, attachment, romantic relationship satisfaction, reliability, validity, 한국판 이성관계 간섭행동척도(KISRR), 집착행동, 편집행동, 애착, 이성관계 만족도, 신뢰도, 타당도.

Abstract

This study was attempted to confirm reliability and to validate the Korean Intrusiveness Scale in Romantic Relationships(KISRR). The KISRR, the Adult Attachment Scale, the Limerence Scale, the Paranoia Scale, and the Romantic Relationship Satisfaction Scale were administered to 228 undergraduate students in romantic relationships. The Intrusiveness Scale in Romantic Relationships was composed of 38 items on self intrusive behavior and 38 items on partner's intrusive behavior. By factor analysis, 32 items that self intrusive behavior and partner's intrusive behavior are correspondent were selected. 4 factors of ‘controlling’, ‘excessive affection demonstration’, ‘unilateral action’, ‘privacy intrusion’ were extracted. Crohnbach ɑ coefficients of the sub-scales were reasonably high and internal consistency reliability was ascertained. The results of convergent validity showed that the KISRR and the other scales were related, The limitations of the study and the suggestions for the further studies were also discussed.

keywords
Korean Intrusiveness Scale in Romantic Relationships, limerence, paranoia, attachment, romantic relationship satisfaction, reliability, validity, Korean Intrusiveness Scale in Romantic Relationships, limerence, paranoia, attachment, romantic relationship satisfaction, reliability, validity, 한국판 이성관계 간섭행동척도(KISRR), 집착행동, 편집행동, 애착, 이성관계 만족도, 신뢰도, 타당도.

참고문헌

1.

김지영 (2002). 편집성 성격성향자의 자기․타인표상 및 지각된 부모양육행동과의 관계. 미발표 석사학위논문. 서울대학교.

2.

양미선 (2009). 자기불일치, 이상형과 실제 파트너의 일치 정도 및 관계의 질이 이성 관계 집착행동에 미치는 영향, 가톨릭대학교 석사학위 논문.

3.

우아미, 박준성, 정태연 (2008). 집착행동의 구성요인 및 집착행동이 이성 관계에 미치는 매개효과, 한국심리학회지: 여성, 13(4), 521-546.

4.

이경성, 한덕웅 (2002). 결혼만족검사의 개발. 한국심리학회지 연차학술발표 논문집, 294- 295

5.

이설아 (2009). 유기도식이 이성관계만족도에 미치는 영향: 인지적 정서조절 전략의 매개효과를 중심으로, 가톨릭대학교 석사학위 논문.

6.

이훈진 (2002). 편집증 집단의 애착유형과 가족 응집성 및 가족 의사소통, 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21(4), 791-807.

7.

이훈진, 원호택 (1997). 편집증에 대한 인지-동기적 접근: 개관. 심리학의 연구문제. 4, 323-364.

8.

정태연, 최상진, 강진경 (2000). 성인기 애착 특성과 낭만적 사랑 및 성격특성과 관계; 성차를 중심으로. 한국 심리학회지: 여성, 5 (2), 85-102.

9.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Belehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation, Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.

10.

Barber, B. K., & Harmon, E. L. (2002). Violating the self: Parental psychological control of children and adolescents. In B. K. Barber (ed.), Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents (pp.15-52). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

11.

Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.

12.

Bentsen, H., Bye, B., Munkvold, O. G., Notland, T. H., Lersbryggen, A. B., Oskarsson, K. H., et al. (1996). Emotional over involvement in parents of patients with schizophrenia or related psychosis: Demographic and clinical predictors. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 622-630.

13.

Betchen, S. J. (2005). Intrusive partners-elusive mates: The pursuer-distance dynamic in couples. New York: Routledge.

14.

Biringen, Z., Robinson, J. L., & Emde, R. N. (2000). The emotional availability scales. Attachment and Human Development, 2, 256- 270.

15.

Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd edn.). New York: Basic Books.

16.

Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment. In. A. Simon & W. A. Rholes(Eds). Attachment theory and Close relationships (pp.46-76). New York: Guilford Press.

17.

Carnelley, K. B., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Jaffe, K. (1994). Depression, working models of others, and relationship functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 127-140.

18.

Cole, J. D., & Kazarian, S. S. (1988) The level of expressed emotion scale: A new measure of expressed emotion. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 392-397.

19.

Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. L. (1981). An instrument to assess adults' orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642-650.

20.

Fanjoux-Cohen, L., Mouly-Bandini, A., Werner, P. D., & Green, R. J. (1998). Rethinking marital “enmeshment”: Distinguishing intrusiveness from closeness-caregiving among French couples. European Psychiatry, 13, 46-51.

21.

Feeney, J. A. (1999). Issues of closeness and distance in dating relationships: Effects of sex and attachment style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 571-590.

22.

Feldman, R. (2007). On the origins of background emotions: From affect synchrony to symbolic expression. Emotion, 7, 601-611.

23.

Forster, J., Finlayson, S., Bentall, R., Day, J., Randall, F., Wood, P., et al. (2003). The Perceived Expressed Emotion in Staff Scale. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 10, 109-117.

24.

Fredman, S. J., Chambless, D. L., & Steketee, G. (2004). Development and validation of an observational coding system for emotional overinvolvement. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 339-347.

25.

Gavazzi, S. M., Reese, M. J., & Sabatelli R. M. (1998). Conceptual development and empirical use of the Family Intrusiveness Scale. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 65-74.

26.

Holmes, J. G. (2004). The benefits of abstract functional analysis in theory construction: The case of interdependence theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 146-155.

27.

Josephs, R. A., Larrick, R. P., Steele, C. M., & Nisbett, R. E. (1992). Protection the self from the negative consequences of risky decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 26-37.

28.

Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Gillathe, O. (2009). Intrusiveness in romantic relationships: A cross-cultural perspective on imbalances between proximity and autonomy. Journal of social and Personal Relationships, 26, 989-1008.

29.

Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R. (2010). Autonomy-proximity imbalance: An attachment theory perspective on intrusiveness in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and individual Differences, 48, 552-556.

30.

Low, S, M.., & Lawrence-Zunigais, D. (2003). The anthropology of space an place: Locating culture. Malden, MA : Blackwell.

31.

Lewinson, M. A., & Werner, P. D. (1997). Factors in Chinese marital process: Relationships to marital adjustment. Family Process, 36, 43-61.

32.

Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (2000). The psychological birth of the human infant: Symbiosis and individuation. New York: Basic Books.

33.

Marshall, T. C. (2008). Cultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 25, 143-168.

34.

Miklowitz, D. J., Goldstein, M. J., & Falloon, I. R. (1983). Premorbid and symptomatic characteristics of schizophrenics from families with high and low levels of expressed emotion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 359-367.

35.

Pistole, M. (1994). Adult attachment styles: Some thoughts on closeness-distance struggles. Family Process, 33, 147-159.

36.

Schmitt, D. P. (2008). How ecological stressors influence dismissing orientations across genders and geographies. Cross-cultural Research, 42, 220-247.

37.

Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2003). What mad pursuit?: Obsessive realtional intrusion and stalking related phenomena. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 8(4), 345-375.

38.

Werner, P. D., Green, R. J., Greenberg, J., Browne, T. L., & McKenna, T. E. (2001) Beyond enmeshment: Evidence for the independence of intrusiveness and closeness- caregiving in married couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 459-471.

logo