바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology

Economic Pressure and Couple Intimacy: Taking Multiple Perspectives and Conflict Response Behavior as Mediators among the Low Income Husband and Wife

Abstract

Economic pressure narrows social cognition that facilitates coping with marital conflict as well as couple intimacy. Thus this study examined the marital processes linking economic pressure to the cognitive-behavioral mechanism, i.e., taking multiple perspectives(MP) and conflict response behaviors(CRB) that, in turn, affect couple intimacy among 183 low-income couples residing in Seoul. Given the gender differences in biobehavioral responses to stress as marked by a pattern of “tend-and-befriend” among women and of “fight-or-flight” among men this study also investigated how such causal paths differ across gender. As expected, results of structural equation modeling analyses supported a full mediation model for the husband. In this group, economic pressure was linked to less of MP that, in turn, caused both the decrease of constructive CRB and the increase of negative CRB, thus resulting in the reduction of couple intimacy. For the wife, data supported a partial mediation model in which the direct effect of economic pressure on couple intimacy was significant. In the wife group economic pressure did not contract MP, as suggested by the stress response theory, and directly reduced constructive CRB that, in turn, affected couple intimacy. Although within both groups, MP, as expected, promoted constructive CRB and decreased negative CRB, suggesting its potential as a psychological resource, its positive effect was cancelled out in the husband group due to the impact of economic pressure. However, in the wife group, MP significantly contributed to couple intimacy through constructive CRB. Results of the multigroup analyses suggested a significant gender difference in only one path leading from negative CRB to couple intimacy. While negative CRB decreased couple intimacy significantly among the husband, it did not show such an effect among the wife. Finally, based on these results, implications for theory development and directions for future studies were discussed.

keywords
저소득층 부부, 경제압박, 관점의 다각화, 부부관계의 친밀성, 갈등반응 행동, 인지-행동기제, low-income couple, economic pressure, multiple perspectives, intimacy of couple relationship, conflict response behavior, cognitive-behavioral mechanism

Reference

1.

권희경 (2009). 가족외부 지원의 경제적 압박 완화 효과: “경제적 압박에 따른 가족 스트레스 모델”을 중심으로. 가족과 문화. 21(2), 111-131.

2.

김주환․김민규․홍세희 (2009). 구조방정식모형으로 논문쓰기. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.

3.

김현주․안현의 (2011). 공감능력과 결혼만족도의 관계에서 용서의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료. 23(1), 157-174.

4.

윤미혜․신희천 (2009). 일상사건의 공유를 통한 부부의 친밀감 발달과정: 지각된 배우자 반응의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격. 23(1), 17-32.

5.

윤수민․이재식 (2010). 고용경쟁력과 조직시민 행동 사이의 관계: 직무 불안정성과 조직불안 및 직무열의의 이중 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직. 23(2), 297- 315.

6.

이남옥․최승미․조현․권정혜․오현주․정정숙(2011). 부부상담연구소를 방문한 내담자 특성 및 조기종결 관련 요인의 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료. 23(3), 543-575.

7.

이순묵․김한조 (2011). 구조방정식모형의 일반화 또는 집단차 연구를 위한 다집단 분석의 관행과 문제점. 사회과학. 43(1), 63- 112.

8.

이우경․방희정 (2008). 성인기 여성의 마음챙김, 자기-자애, 심리적 안녕감 및 심리 증상 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 발달. 21(4), 127-146.

9.

장춘미 (2009). 스트레스와 결혼만족 간의 관계에 대한 부부의 지지행동 및 갈등해결행동의 매개효과, 한국심리학회지: 여성. 14(1), 153-171.

10.

조유리․김경신 (2000). 부부의 갈등대처행동과 결혼만족도-광주지역 거주자를 중심으로. 한국가족관계학회지. 5(2), 1-22.

11.

조준배 (2009). 경제적 스트레스 요인이 부부갈등 대처방법에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 자아존중감과 자기생활만족도 그리고 우울의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한국가족복지학, 27(12), 153-174.

12.

현경자 (2008). 저소득층 부부들의 경제적 스트레스와 부부갈등 및 결혼결과: 탄력적 대응을 돕는 기혼자의 자기해석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격. 22(3), 49-79.

13.

현경자 (2009). 역경극복을 돕는 성인 한국인의 긍정성 탐색: 긍정적 태도 척도개발과 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23(2), 13-42.

14.

현경자 (2012). 여성결혼이민자의 두 문화정체성과 결혼의 안녕: 관점의 다각화에 기반 한 자기긍정성의 매개효과. 한국사회복지학회지, 64(2), 241-271.

15.

현경자․김연수 (2002). 기혼남녀의 결혼만족 이유에 대한 질적 연구: 결혼만족 근원의 유사점과 차이점. 한국사회복지학회지, 49(2), 225-263.

16.

홍세희 (2010). 구조방정식모형: 중급. 고급연구방법론 워크샵 시리즈 8. S & M 리서치 그룹.

17.

Almela, M., Hidalgo, V., Villada, C., Espin, L., Gomez-Amor, J., & Salvador A. (2011). The impact of cortisol reactivity to acute stress on memory: Sex differences in middle-aged people. Stress, 14(2), 117-127.

18.

Aron, A., & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 535-551.

19.

Bakker, A. B., Shimazu, A., Demerouti, E., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2011). Crossover of work engagement among Japanese couples: Perspective taking by both partners. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(1), 112-125.

20.

Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59-73.

21.

Birditt, K. S., Brown, E., Orbush, T. L., & McILvane, J. M. (2010). Marital conflict behaviors and implications for divorce over 16 years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1188-1204.

22.

Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D.(1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 613-628.

23.

Burpee, L. C. & Langer, E. J. (2005). Mindfulness and marital satisfaction. Journal of Adult Development. 12(1), 43-51.

24.

Carrere, S., Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., Coan, J. A., & Ruckstuhl, L. (2000). Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(1), 42-58.

25.

Carson, S. H. & Langer, E. J. (2006). Mindfulness and self-acceptance. Journal of Relational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 24(1), 29-43.

26.

Chajut, E. & Algom, D. (2003). Selective attention improves under stress: Implications for theories of social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 231-248.

27.

Cicchetti, D., Ackerman, B. P., & Izard, C. E. (1995). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 1105-1117.

28.

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

29.

Conger, R. D., Elder, Jr., G., Lorenz F. O., Conger K. J., Simons R. L., Whitreck, L. B., Huck, S., & Melby J. N., (1990). Linking economic hardship to marital quality and instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(3), 643-656.

30.

Conger, R. D., Elder, Jr., G., Simons, R. L., & Ge, X. (1993). Husband and wife differences in response to undesirable life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(1), 71-88.

31.

Conger, R., D., Rueter, M., A., & Elder, Jr., G. (1999). Couple resilience to economic pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 54-71.

32.

Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extention of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 179-193.

33.

DeVellis, R. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

34.

Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 47-77.

35.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Cultivating positive emotions to optimize health and well-being. Prevention & Treatment, 3, 1-25.

36.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221-233.

37.

Gottman, J., Markman, J., & Notarius, C. I. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39(3), 461-477.

38.

Hobfoll, S. E., Nadler, A., & Leiberman, J. (1986). Satisfaction with social support during crisis: Intimacy and self-esteem as critical determinants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 296-304.

39.

Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

40.

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581- 592.

41.

Kinnunen, U. & Feldt, R. (2004). Economic stress and marital adjustment among couples: analyses at the dyadic level. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(5), 519-532.

42.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

43.

Kurdek, L. A. (1994). Conflict resolution styles in gay, lesbian, heterosexual nonparent, and heterosexual parent couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(3), 705-722.

44.

Kwon, H. K., Rueter, M. A., Lee, M. S., Koh, S., & Ok, S. (2003). Marital relationships following the Korea economic crisis: Applying the family stress model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 316-325.

45.

Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. 이양원 옮김(2006). 마음챙김. 서울: 동인.

46.

Langer, E. J. (2000). Mindfulness. Current directions in Psychological Science. 9(6), 220-224.

47.

Langer, E. J. (2002). Well-being: Mindfulness versus positive evaluation. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.). Handbook of positive Psychology(pp. 214 -230). Oxford University Press.

48.

Laurenceau, J. P. Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314-323.

49.

Long, E. R., & Andrews, C. D. (1990). Perspective taking as a predictor of marital adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 126-131.

50.

Margolin, G. F., Fernandez, V., Gorin, L., & Ortiz, S. (1982). The conflict inventory: A measurement of how couples handle marital tension. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Los Angeles, CA.

51.

Miller, G. E., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Refining the association between attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 9(2), 196-208.

52.

Rausch, S. M., Auerback, S. M., & Gramling, S. E. (2008). Gender and ethnic differences in stress reduction, reactivity, and recovery. Sex Roles, 59, 726-737.

53.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445.

54.

Smeets, T., Dziobek, I. & Wolf, O. T. (2009). Social cognition under stress: Differential effects of stress-induced cortisol elevations in healthy young men and women. Hormons and Behavior, 55(4), 507-513.

55.

Sternberg, R. (1986). A Triangular Theory of Love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135.

56.

Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and- befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411-429.

57.

Teasdale, J. D., Moore, R. G., Hayhurst, H., Pope, M., & Williams, S., & Segal, V. (2002). Metacognitive awareness and prevention of relapse in depression: Empirical evidence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 275-287.

58.

Vinokur, A. D., Price, R. H., & Caplan, R. D. (1996). Hard times and hurtful partners: How financial strain affects depression and relationship satisfaction of unemployed persons and their spouses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 166-179.

59.

Vishnevsky, T., Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., & Demakis, G. J. (2010). Gender differences in self-reported posttraumatic growth: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 110-120.

60.

Wells, A. & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ; Erlbaum.

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology