Development and Validation of the Scale for Measuring Positive and Negative Effects of Multiple Roles on Employed Mothers

양현정; 이기학

doi:10.18205/kpa.2015.20.1.002

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.20 No.1

Citation
Share

Development and Validation of the Scale for Measuring Positive and Negative Effects of Multiple Roles on Employed Mothers

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726;

2015, v.20 no.1, pp.25-54

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2015.20.1.002

& (2015). Development and Validation of the Scale for Measuring Positive and Negative Effects of Multiple Roles on Employed Mothers. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 20(1), 25-54, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2015.20.1.002

copy

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the scale for measuring positive and negative effects of multiple roles on employed mothers. This scale was developed based on the literature review, the examination of existing scales and the responses of open-ended questionnaires. The optimal structure of the scale was examined using exploratory factor analysis. The scale for measuring positive effects of multiple roles consisted of factor 1 of Work-to-Family Gains(7 items), factor 2 of Multiple-Role Self-Efficacy(8 items), factor 3 of Family-to-Work Gains(6 items), factor 4 of Financial Gains(4 items), and factor 5 of Separation from Family Stress(3 items). The scale for measuring negative effects consisted of factor 1 of Burnout and Overload(7 items), factor 2 of Family-to-Work Conflict(9 items), factor 3 of Work-to-Family Physical Conflict(7 items), factor 4 of Discomfort in Relationships with Homemakers(4 items), and factor 5 of Work-to-Family Psychological Conflict(3 items). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the hierarchial 2-level factor model of these scales, respectively. The validity and reliability of the scales were verified through validity analysis and test-retest reliability analysis. Finally, the implications and limitations of these findings and recommendable topics for further study were discussed.

keywords: 유자녀 직장여성, 다중역할 긍정 효과, 다중역할 부정 효과, 탐색적 요인분석, 확인적 요인분석, employed mothers, positive effects of multiple roles, negative effects of multiple roles, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis

Reference

김수정, 이혜진, 김유진, 박지은, 유성경 (2012). 한국 여성의 일-가족 향상 척도 타당화 연구. 상담학연구, 13(2), 561-583.

김용석 (2010). 사회적 바람직성 척도의 개발. 한국사회복지행정학, 12(3), 1-39.

김주환, 김민규, 홍세희 (2009). 구조방정식모형으로 논문 쓰기. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.

노성숙, 한영주, 유성경 (2012). 한국에서 ‘워킹맘’으로 살아가기: 직장인엄마의 다중역할 경험에 대한 현상학적 연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 24, 365-395.

박아이린 (2005). MSQ 직무만족도 검사의 문항 및 척도 타당성 분석. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

신강현 (2003). 일반직 종사자를 위한 직무 소진 척도(MBI-GS)에 대한 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 16(3), 1-17.

유성경, 홍세희, 박지아, 김수정 (2012). 한국 여성의 일-가족 갈등 척도 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 17, 1-29.

이동귀, 양난미, 박현주 (2013). 한국형 자존감 평가영역 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 32(1), 271-298.

이주일, 유경 (2010). 직장-가정 갈등의 세대 차이와 직장-가정 갈등이 행복에 미치는 영향: 직장 여성의 경우. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(3), 471-501.

10.

전겸구, 이민규 (1992). 한국판 CES-D 개발 연구 I. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 11(1), 65-76.

11.

정진경 (1989). 성역할 고정관념 및 특성이 기혼여성의 취업에 따르는 적응문제에 미치는 영향: 저소득층의 경우. 한국심리학회지: 사회, 4(2), 169-184.

12.

최윤정, 김계현 (2007). 고학력 기혼여성의 진로단절 위기 경험에 대한 개념도 연구: 진로지속 여성과 중단 여성 간의 비교. 상담학연구, 8(3), 1031-1045.

13.

최윤정, 김계현 (2009). 여성 진로 상담 관점에서 본 다중역할(일-가족) 균형의 구성개념 및 측정에 관한 경험적 연구 고찰. 상담학연구, 10, 365-384.

14.

최윤정, 문상호, 신충식 (2009). 교육 앙극화 해소를 위한 정부의 역할: 워킹맘의 공교육체계 인식에 대한 근거이론적 접근. 한국행정학회 하계학술대회, 1-20.

15.

최정숙 (2011). 일-가족 역할갈등에 관한 근거이론 연구. 정신보건과 사회사업, 39, 214- 247.

16.

탁진국 (2007). 심리검사: 개발과 평가방법의 이해. 서울: 학지사.

17.

통계청 (2011). 2011년 맞벌이 가구 및 경력 단절 여성 통계 집계 결과.

18.

“경력단절 여성 10명 중 8명 다시 일하고 싶어” (매일경제, 2014년 1월 14일)

19.

Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work and family: An expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56, 781-796.

20.

Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131-164.

21.

Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249-276.

22.

Cinamon, R, G., & Rich, Y. (2002). Profiles of attribution of importance to life roles and their implications for the work-family conflict. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 212-220.

23.

Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

24.

Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65-78.

25.

Frone, M. R., & Yardley, J. K. (1996). Workplace family-supportive programmes: Predictors of employed parents’ importance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 351-366.

26.

Ganginis, H. V. (2011). Work-family experiences among employed mothers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park.

27.

Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Source of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76-88.

28.

Greenaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72-92.

29.

Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111-126.

30.

Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560-568.

31.

Hanson, G. C., Hammer, L. B., & Colton, C. L. (2006). Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work-family positive spillover. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3), 249-265.

32.

Kim, Y. (2005). Reconciling work and motherhood: the experience of Korean working mothers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Bath, Bath, UK.

33.

Kirchmeyer, C. (1992). Perceptions of nonwork- to-work spillover: Challenging the common view of conflict-ridden domain relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 231- 249.

34.

Kopelman, R. E., Greenhaus, J. H., & Connolly, T. F. (1983). A model of work, family, and interrole conflict: A construct validation study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 198-215.

35.

Marshall, N. L., & Barnett, R, C. (1993). Work-family strains and gains among two-earner couples. Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 64-78.

36.

O’Brien, K. M. (2011). Women’s management of a meaningful life through work and life integration. 이화여대 심리학과 여성진로 연구팀.

37.

Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

38.

Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1996). The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Test Manual (3rd ed.). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.

39.

Stephens, G. K., & Sommer, S. M. (1996). The measurement of work to family conflict. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 475-486.

40.

Sumer, H. C., & Knight, P. A. (2001). How do people with different attachment styles balance work and family? A personality perspective on work-family linkage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 653-663.

41.

Sussmuth-Dyckerhoff, C., Wang, J., & Chen, J. (2012). Women matter: An Asian perspective. McKinsey & Company.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.20 No.1

Development and Validation of the Scale for Measuring Positive and Negative Effects of Multiple Roles on Employed Mothers

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology