본 연구는 스토킹 행동을 이해하고, 이를 방지하기 위한 교육의 기초자료로서 스토킹에 대한 남성과 여성의 일반적인 태도를 확인하고, 성평등의식과 성차별주의가 스토킹통념 수용에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 마련되었다. 이러한 목적 하에 일차적으로 남녀의 스토킹 문제 인식을 조사하고, 이어서 관련 변인으로 선정한 스토킹 통념, 성평등의식, 성차별주의가 성별로 어떻게 인식되고 서로 어떤 관련성을 갖는가를 알아보고자 하였다. 또한 성평등의식과 성차별주의에 대한 태도에 따른 스토킹 통념수용 정도도 확인하였다. 이를 위해 287명의 응답자(남 86명, 여 201명)로부터 수집된 자료를 연구목적에 맞게 분석(빈도분석, 상관관계, t-검증)을 하였다. 그 결과 일반적 태도에서 조사 대상자들은 스토킹을 구애과정이나 친밀한 관계에서 발생하는 사건으로 바라보았으며, 동기는 상대에 대한‘통제나 지배’로 인식하고 있었다. 성평등의식은 여자들이 높았고, 스토킹통념, 성차별주의는 남자들이 더 높은 것으로 나타났다. 아울러 이들 변인들은 서로 간에 유의미하게 높은 정적 혹은 부적 상관을 보여주었다. 또한 성평등의식이 높은 사람들은 스토킹통념을 덜 받아들였고, 이와는 대조적으로 성차별주의가 높은 사람들은 낮은 사람들에 비해 스토킹통념수용도가 높았다. 이러한 결과는 성평등의식과 성차별주의에 따라 스토킹통념수용이 바뀔 수 있음을 의미한다. 따라서 스토킹을 방지하기 위해서는 행동으로 이어질 가능성을 높이는 스토킹에 대한 잘못된 통념을 바로잡아주어야 하며, 다른 한편으로는 통념수용에 영향을 미치는 성평등의식함양과 성차별주의타파에 대한 교육도 함께 이루어져야 할 것으로 본다.
The purpose of this study is to identify male and femal’s general attitudes of stalikng, and to investigate the effect of gender egalitarianism and sexism on the acceptance of stalking myths. The participants were 287 (201 females, 86 males). Frequency, t-test and correlation were used for the analysis of data collected from participants. In this study, the participants considered stalking as an events to occur in romantic or intimate relationship. They perceived the motive of stalking as a control and dominance of others. Female participants were higher than male on gender egalitarianism, and male were higher than female on stalking myths and ambivalent sexism. There were significant positive or negative correlations among these variables, and the participants to have high gender egalitarianism less accepted stalking myths. In contrast, the participants to have high sexism had a higher stalking myths acceptance than participants to have low. These finding showed that the acceptance of stalking myths could be changed according to gender egalitarianism and sexism. There for, to prevent stalking, it should be corrected wrong myths of stalking, on the other hand, it will be increased the gender egalitarianism, and needed education correcting the sexism.
권희경, 장재홍 (2003). 성희롱, 성폭력, 성적태도, 성폭력에 대한 인식, 자기손해적 성행동, 한국심리학회지: 여성, 8(1), 35-47.
김정인․손영미․김효창 (2006). 성별 및 성희롱 경험에 따른 성희롱 통념과 성역할 관련 태도들간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 11(4), 377-397.
김현정 (1998). 직장내 성적 괴롭힘에 관한 심리학적 일 연구: 동기와 고정관념을 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문.
박지선 (2011). 경찰대 학생들의 강간통념 수용도: 일반대 학생들과의 비교를 중심으로. 경찰대학논문집, 제 31집, 237-267.
박철현, 이상용, 진수명 (2000). 스토킹 실태와대책에 관한 연구. 한국형사정책연구원.
안상수, 김이선, 박군석, 이상화, 김정인 (2008). 성인지력척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국양성평등교육진흥원.
안상수, 김혜숙, 안미영 (2005). 한국형 양가적성차별주의척도(K-ASI) 개발 및 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(2), 17-38.
이건호, 김은정, 황지태 (2002). 스토킹 피해실태와 입법쟁점에 관한 연구, 여성부.
이석재․최상진 (2001). 강간통념수용도에 따른 성행동, 성폭력 및 성폭행사건 지각, 한국심리학회지(사회 및 성격), 29, 97-116.
이정호 (2004). 스토킹 규제방안에 관한 연구, 경기대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
이혜선, 이수정, 김범준 (2006). 스토킹에 대한법률과 일반인의 인식비교. 형사정책연구, 17(4), 363-396.
최인숙, 김정인 (2015). 성폭력 통념수용, 대인폭력수용 및 성역할-관련 태도가 공격적성행동에 미치는 영향-대학생들을 중심으로-, 한국심리학회지: 여성, 20(3), 277-300.
Abrams, D., Viki, G. T. N., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim ·blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125.
Amar, A. F. (2007). Behaviors that college women label as stalking or harassment. Journal of American Psychiatric Nursing Association. 13, 210-220.
Belknap, Joanne. (2001). The Invisible Woman:Gender, Crime, and Justice. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Group.
Björklund, K., Häkkänen-Nyholm, H., Sheridan, L., & Roberts, K. (2010). The Prevalence of stalking among Finnish university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 684-698.
Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta:National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Buhi, E. R., Clayton, H., & Surrency, H. H. (2008). Stalking victimization among college women and subsequent help-seeking behaviors. Journal of American College Health. 57, 419-425.
Burgess, A. W., Baker, T., Greening, D., Hartman, C. R., Burgess, A. G., Douglas, J. E., & Halloran, R. (1997). Stalking behavior within domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12(4), 389-403.
Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
Cho, H. K., Hong, J. S.,& Logan, T. K. (2012). Ecological understanding of risk factors associated with stalking behavior: Implications for social work practice, Journal of Women and Social Work, 27(4), 381-390.
Copson, G., & Marshall, N. (2002). Police care and support for victims of stalking. In J. Boon & L. Sheridan (Eds.), Stalking and psychosexual obsession: Psychological perspectives for prevention, policing and treatment (pp. 49-62). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2000). Obcessive realational intrusion: Incidence, perceived severity and coping. Violence &Victims, 15, 357-372.
Dunlap, E. E., Hodell, E. C., Golding, J. M., & Wasarhaley, N. E. (2012). Mock jurors’'perception of stalking: The impact of gender and expressed fear. Sex Roles, 66, 405-417.
Dunlap, E. E., Lynch, K. R., Jewell, J. A., Wasarhaley, N. E., & Golding, J. M. (2015). Participant gender, stalking myth acceptance, and gender role stereotyping in perceptions of intimate parterner stalking: a structural equation medeling approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, vol 21(3), 234-253.
Egan, R., & Wilson, J. C. (2012). Rape victims’attitudes to rape myth acceptance. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 19, 345-357.
Fremouw, W. J., Westrup, D., & Pennypacker, J. (1997). Stalking on campus: the prevalences and strategies for coping with stalking. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, 666-669.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benvolent sexism: Measureing ambiva,ent sexist toward women, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119-135.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
Hall, D. M. (1998). The victim of stalking. In J. Reid Meloy (ed.), The Psychology of Stalking:Clinical and Forensic Perspectives (pp. 113-137). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Harmon, R., Rosner, R., & Owens, H. (1995). Obsessional harassment and erotomania in criminal court population. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 40, 188-196.
Jones, C. (1996). Criminal harassment (or Stalking). Juristat, 16(12).
Jordan, C. E., Wilcox, P., & Pritchard, A. J. (2007). Stalking acknowledgement and reporting among college women experiencing intrusive behaviors: Implications for the emergence of a “classic stalking case”. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(5), 556-569.
Kamphuis, J. H., Galeazzi, G. M., DeFazio, L., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Farnham, F.,Groenen, A.,James, D., & Vervaeke, G (2005). Stalking perceptions and attitudes amongst helping professions: An EU cross-national comparison. Clinical Psychology & Psychotheraphy, 12, 15-225.
Komorosky, D. (2003). Predictors of Rape Myth Acceptance Among Criminology and Non-Criminology Students. PhD Dissertation, Department of Criminology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Lee, R. K. (1998). Romantic and electronic stalking in a college context. William &Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 4, 373-409.
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
Malamuth, N., Check, J. V. P., & Briere, J. (1986). Sexual arousal in response to aggression: Ideological, aggressive, and sexual correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 330-340.
McEwan, T. E., Mullen, P. E., & MacKenzi, R. (2009). A study of the predictors of persistence in stalking situations. Law and Human Behaviors, 33, 149-158.
McEwan, T. E., Mullen, P. E., MacKenzi, R., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2009). Violence in stalking situations. Psychological Medicine: A Journal of research in Psychiatry and the Allied Science, 39, 1469-1478.
McKeon, B., McEwan, T. E., & Luebbers, S. (2014). “It's not really stalking if you know the person”: Measuring community attitudes that normalize, Justify and minimise stalking. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1-16.
McNamara, C. L., & Marsil, D. F. (2012). The prevalence of stalking among college students:The disparity between researcher and selfidentified victimization. Journal of American College Health, 60(2), 168-174.
Meloy, J. R. (ED) (1998). The Psychology of stalking:Clinical and Forensic Perspectives. Academic Press, San Diego.
Meloy, J. R., & Gothard, S. (1995). A demographic and clinical comparison of obsessional followers and offenders with mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry. 166, 529-536.
Mullen, P. E., Pathe, M., Purcell, R., & Stuart, G. W. (1999). Study of stalkers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1244-1249.
Mullen, P., Pathe, M., & Purcell, R. (2001). Stalking: new constractions of human behavior, Australian and NewZealand Jounal of Psychiatry, 35, 916.
Nagel, B., Matsuo, H., McIntyre, K. P., & Morrison. N. (2005). Attitudes toward victims of rape: Effects of gender, race, religion, and social class. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 725-737.
Pathè, M., & Mullen, P. E. (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 12-17.
Pearce, A., & Easteal, P. (1999). The “Domestic”in stalking: policing domestic stalking in the Australian Capital Territory, Alternative Law Jounal, 24, 165-174.
Peterson, Zoe D., & Charlene L. Muehlenhard. (2004). “As it Rape? The Function of Women’ Rape Myth Acceptance and Definitions of Sex in Labeling Their Own Experiences”. Sex Roles, (51), 129-144.
Phillips, L., Quirk, R., Rosenfeld, B., & O’Connor, M. (2004). Is it stalking? Perceptions of stalking among college undergraduates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 73-96.
Quackenbush, R. L. (1989). A comparison of androgynous, masculine sex-typed and undifferentiated males on dimensions and attitudes toward rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 318-342.
Rhatigan, D. L., & Streat, A E. (2005). The impact of intimate partner violence on decisions to leave dating relationships: a test of the investment model. Journal of Interpersonal violence, 20(12), 1580-1597.
Scott, A. J., Nixon, K., & Sheridan, L. (2013). The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking. A comparison of laypersons, nonspecialist police officers, and specialist police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 1434-1448.
Sheridan, L., & Davies, G. M. (2001). What is stalking? The match between legislation and public perception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6(1), 3-17.
Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., & Davies, G. (2000). Stalking: Seeking the victim’'s perspective. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 6, 267-280.
Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Stalking myth-attributions:Examining the role of individual and contextual variables on attributions in unwanted pursuit scenarios. Sex Roles, 66, 378-391.
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cadiz, M. (2002). The media construction of stalking stereotypes. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 9, 128-149.
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007). The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 64-86.
Spitzberg, B. H., Cupach, W. R., & Ciceraro, L. D. (2010). Sex differences in stalking and obsessive relational intrusion: two metaanalyses. Partner Abuse, 1, 259-285.
Straus, M. A. (2004). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10(7), 790-811.
Thomas, S. D. M., Purcell, R., Path´e, M., & Mullen, P. E. (2008). Harm associated with stalking victimization. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 42, 800-806.
Tjaden, P., & Thoenness, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Washington, DC.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-162.
Weller, M., Hope, L., & Sheridan, L. (2013). Police and public perceptions of stalking: the role of prior victim offender relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 320-339.
Westrup, D. (1998). Applying functional analysis to stalking behavior. In J. R. Meloy (Ed.), The psychology of stalking: Clinical and forensic perspective (pp. 275-294). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
