Validation of Korean version of the Index

김영애

doi:10.18205/kpa.2016.21.2.004

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.21 No.2

Citation
Share

Validation of Korean version of the Index

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726;

2016, v.21 no.2, pp.253-273

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2016.21.2.004

(2016). Validation of Korean version of the Index. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 21(2), 253-273, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2016.21.2.004

copy

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of Korean version of the Index of Spouse Abuse(Hudson & McIntosh, 1981). The ISA was originally developed to ask female partner about her male spouse however, in this study neutral expressions were adapted to apply to all male and female partners. Participants were 469 individuals(173 males and 296 females) out of legally married couple, former spouse and living in the state which was following the criteria of spouse abuse proposed by Torres, etc. (2010). Through the exploratory factor analysis, not only the three factor structure of psychological abuse, physical abuse and control behavior was extracted but the fit of this model was also confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis. The t-test or ANOVA and ANCOVA(covariate: age) were performed to examine the difference between CTS and BDI scores according to the level of psychological, physical abuse, and control behavior of K-ISA. The results showed high internal consistency. In conclusion, K-ISA was found to be a reliable and valid scale of measuring three abusive factors in Korean population. Limitations of this study discussed in relation to future studies.

keywords: 배우자 학대, 심리적 학대, 신체적 학대, 통제행동, 타당화, spouse abuse, psychological abuse, physical abuse, controlling behavio, validity.

Reference

김남걸 (2001). Likert 척도 개발을 위한 문항선정 방법의 비교 분석. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.

박명혜 (2008). 부부폭력 피해여성의 심리사회적 요인이 자립의지에 미치는 영향 연구: 쉼터 입소 여성을 중심으로. 상명대학교 박사학위논문.

변화순, 원영애, 최은영 (1993). 가정폭력의 예방과 대책에 관한 연구. 서울: 한국여성개발원.

서영석, 조화진, 안하얀, 이정선 (2012). 한국인이 경험한 외상사건: 종류 및 발생률. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 24(3), 671-701.

손정영 (1997). 갈등대처유형척도(CTS 2)의 한국부부에 대한 타당성 연구-남편의 갈등대처유형 및 아내학대행위를 중심으로. 한국가족관계학회, 2, 51-87.

여성가족부 (2014). 2013년 전국 가정폭력 실태조사 보고서. 서울: 여성가족부.

이영호, 송종용 (1991). BDI, SDS, MMPI-D 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도에 대한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 10(1), 98-113.

이옥희 (2010). 남편의 심리적 폭력이 아내의 우울 및 심리적 안녕감에 미치는 영향: 인지요인을 매개변인으로. 대구대학교 박사학위논문.

이종선, 권정혜 (2002). 부부의 대인관계, 의사소통 방식, 결혼만족도가 부부폭력에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상. 21(2). 313-330.

10.

장덕희 (2001). 가정폭력 경험자녀의 적응을 위한 사회복지실천 개입 방안에 관한 연구. 사회복지개발연구, 7(3), 577-600.

11.

정서영 (1995). 부부간의 심리적․신체적 학대, 대처양식과 개인의 적응감. 숙명여자대학교 석사학위논문.

12.

정윤경 (2010). 가정폭력 치료프로그램 이수자의 정서적 폭력이 아내의 우울에 미치는 영향. 한국사회복지학, 62, 185-209.

13.

최주연 (2012). 배우자의 심리적 학대, 해리 및 긍정적 대처방식이 자기효능감에 미치는 영향. 계명대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

14.

탁진국 (2014). 심리검사 개발과 평가 방법의 이해. 서울: 학지사.

15.

한국여성정책연구원 (2014). 여성폭력 예방체계의 통합적 구축방안. 서울: 한국여성정책연구원.

16.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

17.

홍창희, 박유숙 (2001). 남편의 폭력이 아내의 정신병리에 미치는 영향. 심리과학 연구, 2, 1-20.

18.

Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.

19.

Campbell, D, W., Campbell, J., King, Ch., Parker, B., & Ryan, J. (1994). The reliability and factor structure of the Index of Spouse Abuse with African-American women. Violence and Victims, 9, 259-274.

20.

Cascardi, M., & O'Leary, K, D. (1984). Depressive symptomatology. self-esteem and self-blame in battered women. Journal fo Family Violence, 7(4), 24-59.

21.

Coker, A., L., Weston, R., Creson, D., L., Justice, B., & Balakeney, P. (2005). TTSD symptoms among men and women survivor of intimate partner violence: The role of risk and protective factors. Violence and Victims, 20, 625-643.

22.

Cook, S, L, Conrad, L, Bender, M., & Kaslow, N, L. (2003). The internal validity of the Index of Spouse Abuse in African American women. Violence and Victims, 18, 641-657.

23.

Dalton, C., & Schneider, E. M. (2001). Battered women and law. New York: Foundation Press.

24.

Dienemann, J., Boyle, E., Baker, W., Resnick, W., Wiederhorn, N., & Campbell, H. (2000). Intimate parter abuse among women diagnosed with depression. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 21, 499-513.

25.

Eliason, M. J., Taylor, J. Y., & Arndt, S. (2005). Assessing intimate partner violence in incarcerated women. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 1, 106-110.

26.

Ferraro, K. J. (1989). The legal response to woman battering in the United States. In J. Hanmer, J. Radford, & E. A. Stanko (Eds), Women, policing, and male violence: International perspectives(pp.155-184). London & New York, Routledge.

27.

Follingstad, D, R., Rutledge, L, L., Berg, B, B., Hause, E, S., & Pol, D, S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 5(2), 107-120.

28.

Gelles, R. J., & Cornell, C. P. (1983). International perspectives on family violence. Lexington. KY: Lexington Books.

29.

Hudson, W, W., & McIntosh, S, R. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 873-888.

30.

Johnson, M, P. (1995). Patriarchal tettorism and common couple violence: Two forms of against women. Journal of Harriabe and the Family, 57, 283-294.

31.

Kamimura, A., Nancy, C., Jennifer, T., Jeanie, A., & Lenora, M. (2014). Prevalence of intimate partner violence and its impact on health: Female and male patients using a free clinic. Journal Care Poor Undersery, 25(2), 731-745.

32.

Sierra, J, C., Monge, F, S., Santos-Iglesias, P., Bermudez, M, P., & Salinas, J, M. (2011). Validation of a reduced Spanish version of the Index of Spouse Abuse. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11(2), 363-383.

33.

Sprague, S., Goslings, J. C., Hogentoren, C., de Milliano, S., Simunovic, N., Madden, K., & Bhandari, M. (2014). Prevalence of intimate partner violence across medical and surgical health care settings A systematic review. Violence Against Women, 1077801213520574.

34.

Straus, M, A., & Gelles, R, J. (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

35.

Sugg, N. (2015). Intimate partner violence: prevalence, health consequences, and intervention. The Medical Clinics of North America, 99(3), 629-649.

36.

Tolman, R, M., & Bhosley, G. (1991). The outcome of participation in a shelter sponsored program for men who batter. In D. D. Knudsen & J. L. Miller (Eds), Abuse and battered: Social and legal responses to family violence (pp.113-122). New York: Walker DeGruyter. Inc.

37.

Torres, A., Navarro, P., Garcia-Esteve, L., Tarragona, M, J., Ascaso, C., Herreras, Z., Gelabert, E., Imaz, M., L, Roca, A., Subira, S., & Martin-Santos, R. (2010). Detecting domestic violence: Spanish external validation of the Index of Spouse Abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 275-286.

38.

Walker, L, E. (1979). Treatment alternatives for battered women: The victimization of women. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.

39.

Wolfe, D. A., & Jaffe, P. (1991). Child abuse and family violence as determinants of child psychopathology. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 23, 282-299.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.21 No.2

Validation of Korean version of the Index

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology