The Mediation Effects of Sexual Assertiveness between Gender-role Stereotypes and Dating Violence Acceptability of Female College Students

손강숙; 정소미

doi:10.18205/kpa.2016.21.3.005

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.21 No.3

Citation
Share

The Mediation Effects of Sexual Assertiveness between Gender-role Stereotypes and Dating Violence Acceptability of Female College Students

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726; (E)3058-2083

2016, v.21 no.3, pp.441-457

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2016.21.3.005

& (2016). The Mediation Effects of Sexual Assertiveness between Gender-role Stereotypes and Dating Violence Acceptability of Female College Students. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 21(3), 441-457, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2016.21.3.005

copy

Abstract

This study aims to examine the mediating effect of sexual assertiveness between gender-role stereotypes and dating violence acceptability of female college students. For this purpose, surveys were conducted by 548 female students attending five four-year-course colleges in Seoul and Gyeonggi Province, using gender-role stereotype scale, dating violence acceptability scale, and sexual assertiveness scale. Based on the collected data, descriptive statistic, correlation analysis, structure equation model test about model of this study, and goodness-of-fit test were performed and analysed. Also, interviews were conducted by 60 female students who participated in the survey in order to derive qualitative information relating to sexual assertiveness. The results of this study are as follows. First, the results of qualitative research about the reason why college female students don’t stand up the sexual assertiveness effectively between couple relationships, and what kind of helping behaviors they need, 3 domains and 12 categories(4 internal reasons, 5 external reasons, 3 helping behaviors they need) were finally derived. Second, gender-role stereotypes and dating violence acceptability were found to have a significant positive correlation, gender-role stereotypes and sexual assertiveness, and dating violence acceptability were shown to have a significant negative correlation. Third, the mediating effect of sexual assertiveness on the relationship between gender-role stereotypes and dating violence acceptability appeared to be significant. This study is significant in terms of providing basic information for intervention to change awareness about gender-role and sexual assertiveness through female college students’ counseling and training.

keywords: 여대생, 성역할 고정관념, 데이트 폭력허용도, 성적 자기주장, female college students, gender-role stereotypes, dating violence acceptability, sexual assertiveness

Reference

권희경, 박경 (2003). 성폭력 장기후유증 척도의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 8(3), 15-33.

김동기 (2009). 가정폭력 경험이 대학생의 데이트폭력 가해행동에 미치는 영향: 폭력허용도의 매개효과를 중심으로. 청소년학연구, 16(6), 135-159.

김동일 (1991). 성의사회학. 文音社.

김복태 (2001). 성별과 성역할 고정관념에 따른 공감능력 및 성폭력 사건 지각의 차이. 전북대학교 사회과학연구소, 사회과학연구, 27(0), 249-268.

김소정 (2013). 성역할 고정관념에 영향을 미치는 요인: 성인기 인구집단을 중심으로. 사회복지연구, 44(1), 89-111.

김영희, 문승태, 강희순 (2013). 대학생의 성적자기주장에 영향을 미치는 요인. 여성건강간호학회지, 19(3), 166-175.

김은경, 엄애선 (2010). 가정폭력 목격이 자녀의 데이트 성폭력에 영향을 미치는 과정에서 성역할태도의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 15(4), 759-777.

남현미 (2003). 대학생 데이트성폭력 실태와 가해 예측 요인에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문.

도미향, 이용복 (2005). 우리나라의 성폭력 피해자의 서비스 지원 체계에 관한 연구. 복지행정논총, 15(2), 93-114.

10.

박선미, 송원영 (2012). 성폭력에 대한 통념과성관련 경험이 여대생의 성적 자기주장에미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 17(2), 265-280.

11.

서경현 (2006). 친밀한 관계에서의 갈등과 건강 ; 데이트 폭력의 심각성과 심리적 개입. 한국심리학회, 한국심리학회 연차학술대회 발표논문집, 2006(단일호), 48-49.

12.

서경현, 이영자 (2001). 고등학생들의 연애폭력에 대한 예측변인. 한국심리학회지: 문화및 사회문제, 7(2), 91-106.

13.

심정신, 이영숙, 오숙희 (2012). 대학생의 성역할 고정관념, 성폭력 인지도 및 성폭력허용도에 관한 연구. 여성건강간호학회지, 18(2), 117-125.

14.

오숙희, 강희순, 김윤희 (2010). 남․녀 대학생의 강간통념 수용도, 성역할 고정관념에대한 연구. 한국보건간호학회지, 24(2), 249-257.

15.

오세연, 곽영길 (2011). 데이트폭력의 실태와대응방안에 관한 연구-사례분석을 중심으로-. 한국경찰학회보, 13(5), 3-27.

16.

이영숙 (1998). 이성교제 중 발생한 폭력. 대한가정학회지, 36(4), 49-61.

17.

이은숙, 강희순 (2014). 대학생의 성별에 따른성역할 고정관념, 성적 자기주장성, 성폭력 인식도, 성폭력 허용도 및 데이트 성폭력 경험. 동서간호학연구지, 20(1), 48-56.

18.

이은진 (2015). 성적 자기결정권에 대한 심리학 연구. 한국심리힉회지: 여성, 20(3), 427-441.

19.

이지연, 이은설 (2005). 대학생의 데이트 성폭력 피해와 가해에 대한 설명모형. 한국심리학회지 : 상담 및 심리치료, 17(2), 419-436.

20.

장순복. 김소야자, 한인영, 박영주 (2000). 십대여학생의 임신실태 및 예방대책. 서울: 십대 여학생보호위원회.

21.

장순복, 이선경, 김영란 (2003). 여고생의 성적자기주장 프로그램 참여 효과 Effects of a Sexual Assertiveness Training Program in High School Girls. 대한간호학회지, 33(5), 659-667.

22.

장영철, 노성희, 박재용, 오남석, 윤희지 (2015). 3세, 5세 남녀아동의 성역할 고정관념에 대한 연구. 한국심리학회 연차학술대회 발표논문집, 2015(단일호), 469-469.

23.

장윤경 (2002). 데이트 성폭력 피해경험에 관한연구: 데이트 성폭력 인지도의 매개효과를중심으로. 이화여자대학교 사회복지대학원석사학위논문.

24.

장희숙, 조현각 (2001). 대학생 이성교제폭력의실태와 위험요인들. 한국가족복지학, 8(단일호), 179-204.

25.

정소영, 임채영, 이명신 (2016). 대학생의 데이트폭력 편견이 데이트폭력 가해행동에 미치는 영향 -폭력허용도와 관계갈등의 매개효과를 중심으로-. 사회과학연구, 27(4), 127-151.

26.

정주리, 이기학 (2007). 성별과 성역할 고정관념에 따른 진로타협 과정에서 선호도 차이. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 12(2), 161-174.

27.

좌현숙 (2011). 성역할 고정관념 발달궤적의성차와 예측요인-아동, 청소년기를 중심으로-. 청소년학연구, 18(9), 237-263.

28.

최명현 (2004). 여대생의 성적 자기주장 관련요인. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

29.

하예지, 서미경 (2014). 데이트 폭력 인식과 폭력경험에 관한 연구. 사회과학연구, 30(4), 79-103.

30.

홍영오, 연성진, 주승희 (2015). 여성대상 폭력에 대한 연구: 친밀한 관계에서의 폭력을중심으로. 한국형사정책연구원.

31.

http://hotline.or.kr 한국 여성의 전화 연합

32.

Ackard, D. M., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2002). Date violence and date rape among adolescents: Associations with disordered eating behaviors and psychological health. Child Abuse Neglect, 26(5), 455-473.

33.

Arias, I., & Pape, K. T. (1999). Psychological abuse: Implications for adjustment and commitment to leave violent partners. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 55-67.

34.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.

35.

Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York.: Morrow.

36.

Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 205-229.

37.

Finch, J. F., & West, S. G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 439-485.

38.

Foo, L., & Margolin, G. (1995). A multivariate investigation of dating aggression. Journal of Family Violence, 10(4), 351-377.

39.

Choice, P., & Lamke, L. K. (1997). A Conceptual Approach to Understanding Abused Women's Stay/Leave Decisions. Journal of Family Issues, 18(3), 290-314.

40.

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping:an integrated model. MIS quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.

41.

Greendlinger, v., & Byrne, D. (1987). Coercive sexual fantasies of college men as predictors of selfreported likelihood to rape and overt sexual aggression. The Journal of Sex Research, 23(1), 1-11.

42.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.

43.

Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of sex research, 40(1), 87-100.

44.

Kelly, L. (1987). The continuum of sexual violence. In J. Hanmer, & M. Maynard, Women violence and social control (pp. 46-60). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.

45.

Kiefer, A. K., & Sanchez, D. T.(2007). Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective. Personal Relationships, 14(2), 269-290.

46.

Lewin, M. (1985). Unwanted intercourse: The difficulty of saying no. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(2), 184-192.

47.

Morokoff, P. J., Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Whitmire, L., Grimley, D. M., Gibson, P. R., & Burkholder, G. J. (1997). Sexual assertiveness scale(SAS) for women:Development and validation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(4), 790-804.

48.

Muehlenhard C. L., & McCoy, M. L. (1991) The Sexual Double Standard and Women's Communication about Sex. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(3), 447–461.

49.

Nicolaidis, C., & Touhouliotis, V. (2006). Addressing intimate partner violence in primary care: Lessons from chronic illness management. Violence and Victims, 21(0), 101-115.

50.

O'Keefe, M. (1997). Predictors of dating violence among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(4), 546-568.

51.

Morokoff, P. J., Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Whitmire, L., Grimley, D. M., Gibson, P. R., & Burkholder, G. J. (1997). Sexual Assertiveness Scale (SAS) for women:development and validation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(4), 790.

52.

Perper, T, & Weis, D. L. (1987). Preceptive and rejective strategies of U.S. and Canadian college women. The Journal of Sex Research, 23, 455-480.

53.

Pulerwitz, J., Gortmaker, S. L., & DeJong, W. (2000). Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles, 42(7-8), 637-660.

54.

Reneau, S., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2005). Unwanted consensual sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. Paper presented at the joint Eastern Region-Midcontinent Region Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Atlanta.

55.

Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 558-571.

56.

Russell, D. W., Kahn, J. H., Spoth, R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1998). Analyzing data from experimental studies: A latent variable structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(1), 18-29.

57.

Stets, J. E. (1992). Interactive processes in dating aggression: A National Study. Journal of Marriage and Family. 54(1), 165-177.

58.

Straus, M. A. (2004). Prevalence of Violence Against Dating Partners by Male and Female University Students Worldwide. Violence against women, 10(7), 790-811.

59.

Vanghn, R., Rupal, S., & Constance, W. (2002). Is lack of sexual assertiveness among adolescent and young adult women a cause for concern? Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 34(4), 178-183.

60.

Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health education & behavior, 27(5), 539-565.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.21 No.3

The Mediation Effects of Sexual Assertiveness between Gender-role Stereotypes and Dating Violence Acceptability of Female College Students

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology