바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

대중서사연구

Review Essay—Digital Visual Effects in Cinema: The Seduction of Reality

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)27139964
2018, v.24 no.1, pp.483-515
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2018.24.1.015

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper reviews Stephen Prince’s 2012 book, Digital Visual Effects in Cinema: the Seduction of Reality in the question of whether or not cinema has changed in its way of telling stories since its digitization. Having replaced film, digital imaging technologies revolutionized the film industry in profound ways. They have been expanding the illusory world of cinematic spectacles that always excite our eyes. Many scholars in cinema studies have been interested in developing the understanding of digital cinema, its history, theories, and aesthetics. Particularly, they focus on whether a new aesthetics is emerging in filmmaking in cinema’s digital age. Stephen Prince’s book is a valuable contribution to the growing literature on digital culture. The book features a useful survey of the history of digital technology. Individual chapters are about selected production departments, such as those in lighting performance and art directing, which form the codes of realism that anchor the visual aspect of classic Hollywood storytelling. Without overwhelming readers with unnecessary details, Prince provides a behind-the-scenes look at various digital visual effects, while comparing with corresponding special effects of the film age. Prince’s main argument is that the digital visual effects adhere to conventional codes of realism.

keywords
Digital Visual Effects, Special Effects, Post-Cinema, CGI, Algorithm, the Immersive, Synthespian, 디지털 시각효과, 특수효과, 포스트시네마, CGI, 알고리듬, 몰입감, 합성배우

Reference

1.

Prince, Stephen. Digital Visual Effects in Cinema: The Seduction of Reality. New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press, 2012.

2.

Arnheim, Rudolf. Film as Art. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957.

3.

Belton, John. “Digital Cinema: A False Revolution.” October 100, 2002, pp.98-114.

4.

Bode, Lisa. Making Believe: Screen Performance and Special Effects in Popular Cinema, London: Rutgers University Press, 2017.

5.

Connor, Steven. Dream Machine, London: Open Humanities Press, 2017.

6.

Creed, Barbara. “The Cyberstar: Digital Pleasures and the End of the Unconscious.” Screen 41.1, 2000, pp.79-86.

7.

Densen, Shane and Julia Leyda, Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21st-Century Film. Falmer: REPRAME Books, 2016.

8.

Evertt, Anna. “Digitextuality and Click Theory: These on Convergence Media in the Digital Age.” In Anna Evertt and J. T. Caldwell (eds.). New Medis: Theories and Practices of Digitextuality. New York: Routledge, 2003, pp.3-28.

9.

Fielding, Raymond. Special Effects Cinematography. London: Focal Press, 1965.

10.

Gaudreault, André and Philippe Marion. The End of Cinema? A Medium in Crisis in the Digital Age. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.

11.

Gunning, Tom “Moving Away from the Index: Cinema and the Impression of Reality.” differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 18.1, 2007, pp.29-52.

12.

Keil, Charlie and Kristen Whissel. Editing and Special/Visual Effects. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 2016.

13.

Kittler, Friedrich. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.

14.

McClean, T Shilo. Digital Storytelling: The Narrative Power of Visual Effects in Film, Cambridge, Mass and London: The MIT Press, 2007.

15.

North, Dan and Bob Rehak and Michael Duffy. Special Effects: New Histories/ Theories/ Contexts, London: BFI, 2015.

16.

North, Dan. Performing Illusions: Cinema, Speccial Effects and the Virtual Actor, London and New York: Wallflower Press, 2008.

17.

Peirce, Sanders Charles. “On the Algebra of Logic: A Contribution to the Philosophy of Notation,” in The Essential Peirde: Selected Writings Vol 1 (1867-1893). edited by Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992, pp.225-228.

18.

Prince, Stephen. “True Lies: Perceptual Realism, Digital Images, and Film Theory,” Film Quarterly, 49.3, 1996, pp.27-37.

19.

Rickitt, Richard. Special Effects: The History and Technique. New York: Billboard Books, 2000.

20.

Shaviro, Steven. Post-Cinematic Affect, Winchester, UK and Washington, USA: Zero Books, 2010.

21.

Soderman, Braxton. “The Index and the Algorithm.” differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 18.1, 2007, pp.153-186.

22.

Sontag, Susan. “The Decay of Cinema.” The New York Times, 25 February, 1996.

23.

Turnock, A. Julie. Plastic Reality: Special Effects, Technology, and the Emergence of 1970s Blockbuster Aesthetic, New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.

24.

Whissel, Kristen. Spectacular Digital Effects: CGI and Contemporary Cinema, Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2014.

25.

Willemen, Paul. “Indexicality, Fantasy and the Digital.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 14.1, 2013, pp.110-135.

26.

Wolf, Mark. Abstracting Reality: Art, Communication, and Cognition in the Digital Age, Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 2000.

27.

Wollen, Peter. Signs and Meaning in the Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1972.

대중서사연구