바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Distributors' Preference for the Flextime System

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2012, v.10 no.4, pp.13-20
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.10.4.201204.13
Lee, Won-Haeng
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The "flextime" system, which was initially designed to maintain a balance between work and personal life, has recently received much attention as an alternative form of work, enabling employees to fully exert their creativity. Most studies show that the effects of flextime on performance, productivity, attitude toward the organization, absenteeism, and turnover differ between managerial and non-managerial workers. This suggests that workers' personal characteristics affect their preference for flextime by directly or indirectly influencing its result variables. As most Korean companies have not adopted the flextime system, little research has been conducted on it in Korea. Recently, Korean companies have been discussing flextime as one of several measures for enhancing international competitiveness. Therefore, this study aims to offer a theoretical framework for the introduction of the system by analyzing the effects of the precedent factors on the preference for flextime. Though not statistically significant, a higher preference for flextime is noted among workers over the age of 36. Older workers usually are more conservative and less adaptable to change but here the older Korean workers may be anxious and resistant. Additional research on workers in different types of businesses using improved research methods will lead to more meaningful results. Married workers display a lower preference to flextime than single workers. In Korea, the current atmosphere focused on a happy home encourages married workers to prefer regular work hours, enabling them to go to and from work on a regular schedule. This means that normal working hours, from morning to evening, are preferred as it is the most suitable system for families. However, this is not so in the case of single workers. Unmarried singles tend to prefer flextime for investing in self-development toward future prosperity, over the benefits of regular working-hours. Flextime is designed to meet their needs to some extent as it is helpful in maintaining a balance between work life and self-development. If flextime is selected, workers can spend mornings on self-development and work in the afternoons. Therefore, when flextime is introduced in Korea, it would be desirable to start with unmarried workers, to increase corporate creativity and productivity and develop individual potential. In particular, when the five-day workweek, the main concern for companies and labor unions, is adopted, synergy with flextime could be expected and a gradual implementation of flextime will be effective. Gender difference shows similar results to marital status with male workers displaying a higher preference for flextime. It is inferred that male workers' attitudes toward flextime are more favorable than female workers' because flextime enables self-development and work life to coexist. A relatively weak, though statistically significant, correlation exists between control position and flextime preference with inner-control-oriented workers displaying favorable attitudes toward flextime. Generally, inner-control-oriented workers tend to attribute the consequences caused by any person or partner relationship to themselves. Thus, when a new system is introduced they are likely to have less reluctance and fear than outer-control-oriented workers, because they think it is important to deal with the new system. A weak but slight correlation exists between the desire for achievement and flextime preference. People who have a higher desire for achievement are willing to consider the new system, especially if significant success is reasonably expected. This result is derived from a reasonable judgment that flextime offers an individual the time for self-development while the organization benefits from the resulting creativity and performance enhancements. Although not the primary analysis, a high correlation is found between control position and the desire for achievement, which is consistent with the res

keywords
유동근무제, 선호성향, 고정근무제

Reference

1.

윤명길, 김유오 (2007), “한국에서의 유통학문 연구방법론에 대한소고”, 유통과학연구, 5(1), 25-87.

2.

이영철, 양회창 (2012), “대학생들이 지각하는 전통시장 선택속성이 관계품질에 미치는 영향: 소비감정의 조절효과와 소비자가치의 매개효과”, 유통과학연구, 10(1), 33-42.

3.

Cohen, A.R. & Gadon, H. (1978), Alternative work schedules: Integrating individual and organizational needs, MA: Addison-Wesley.

4.

Dalton, D.R. & Mesch, D.J. (1990), “The Impact of Flexible Scheduling on Employee Attendance and Turnover”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 370-387.

5.

Glickman, A.S. & Brown, Z.H. (1974), Changing schedules of work: Patterns and implications, Washington, D.C.: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

6.

Golembiewski, R.T., Yeager, S. & Hilles, R. (1975), “Factor Analysis of Some flexitime Effects: Attitudinal and Behavioral Consequences of a Structural Intervention”, Academy of Management Journal. September, 18(3), 500-509.

7.

Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Hopp, M.A. & Sommerstad, C.R. (1978),“Implementation and evaluation of flexible work hours: acase study”, The personnel administrator, 23(1), 39-41.

8.

Hicks, W.D. & Klimoski, R.J. (1981), “The impact of flexitime on employee attitudes”, Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 333-341.

9.

Kim, J.S. & Campagna, A.F. (1981), “Effects of flexitime on employee attendance and performance: A field experiment”, Academy of Management Journal. 24(4), 729-741.

10.

Mahoney, T.A. (1978), “The Rearranged Work Week”, California Management Review. Summer. 20(4), 31-39.

11.

Martin, J.K. & Miller, G.A. (1986), “Job satisfaction and absenteeism: Organizational, individual, and job-related correlates”, Work and Occupations, 13, 33-46.

12.

McGuire, J.B. & Liro, J.R. (1987), “Absenteeism and flexible work schedules”, Public Personnel Management, 16, 47-59.

13.

Morris, J.H. & Sherman, D.J. (1981), “Generalizability of an organizational commitment model”, Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 512-526.

14.

Newstrom, J. W., & Pierce, J. L. (1979), “Alternative Work Schedule : the state of the art”, The Personnel Administrator, 24(10), 19-23.

15.

Orpen, C. (1981), “Effect of Flexible Working Hours on Employee Satisfaction and Performance: A Field Experiment”, Journal of Applied Psychology. 66(1), 113-115.

16.

Pierce, J.L. & Newstrom, J.W. (1980), “Major influence: A process model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 391-407.

17.

Pierce, J.L. & Newstrom, J.W. (1982), “Employee responses to flexible work schedules: An inter-organization, inter-system comparison”, Journal of Management, 8(1), 9-25.

18.

Pierce, J.L., Newstrom, J.W., Dunham, R.B. & Barber, A.E. (1989), Alternative Work Schedules, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

19.

Ronen, S. (1981), Flexible Working Hours, New York: McGraw-Hill.

20.

Schein, V.E., Mauner, E.H. & Novak, J.F. (1977), “Impact of Flexible working hours on Productivity”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 46-56.

21.

Sheridan, J.E. (1985), “A catastrophe model of employee withdrawal leading to low job performance, high absenteeism, and job turnover during the first year of employment”, Academy of Management Journal, 28, 88-109.

22.

Steers, R.M. & Rhodes, S.R. (1984), Knowledge and speculation about absenteeism, In Paul S. Goodman and Robert S. Atkin (eds). Absenteeism: 229-275. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

23.

Swart, J.C. (1985), “Clerical workers on flexitime: A survey of three industries”, Personnel, 62. 42-44.

24.

Wade, M. (1973), Flexible Working Hours in Practice, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

25.

Walch, J.L. & Gordon, D. (1980), “Assessing the Impact of flexitime on Productivity”, Business Horizons, 23. 61-65.

The Journal of Distribution Science