바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Korean Customer Attitudes Towards SNS Shopping

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2012, v.10 no.8, pp.7-14
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.10.8.201208.7
Cho, Young-Sang
Heo, Jeong-Yoon
Youn, Myoung-Kil

Abstract

As a new format of retailing, social shopping on SNS has rapidly grown in recent. Although there is much literature associated with customer behaviours in the academic world, little attention has been paid to identifying the shopping patterns of SNS shoppers. This paper will, thus, identify how perceived value has an impact on the buying intention of SNS shoppers, after illustrating what kind of factor influences the formation process of perceived value in the Korean marketplace. Given that SNS shoppers are for the most part 20s as well as 30s, the authors handed out questionnaires to them. Furthermore, based on literature review results, the conceptualised research model was developed. Despite lack of literature, the authors developed five constructs like price reduction, quantity- and time-limited message, product ranges, information-sharing, and required number of shoppers. The researchers made a considerable effort to identify the relationship between research concepts and each variable, based on a few research analysis methods such as frequency analysis, the Varimax rotation technique used orthogonal rotation, Cronbach's Alpha, PCA (Principle Component Analysis), and the like. Amongst the 5 variables used to measure the degree of influences on the perceived value as a social shopping characteristic, it has been evident that price cut, required minimum shoppers, product variety, and information-sharing have a positive impact on the perceived value formation processes of SNS customers. Also, this research implies that SNS retailers can differentiate themselves from other retailers by differently using the above factors. From a practitioner's point of view, these factors should be strategically used to increase the social shopping opportunities of SNS users. It is, furthermore, evident that the perceived value formed by the above 4 factors have played an important role in the buying decision process of SNS customers. In a sense, whether customers are aware of higher price cut rates, information-sharing, required minimum shoppers, and product variety has a positive impact on making buying decisions. From a retailer's point of view, online shopping mall operators are able to use blog as well as twitter to improve the buying intention as a marketing tool of social network, because the business activities provided by social shopping retailers, like the rapid, accurate responses to customer requirements, the provision of a variety of information, and the communications between customers are closely related to buying intentions. There are a few research limitations to conduct this empirical research. It was not easy to review prior papers, due to its lack. In spite of the increasing number of SNS shoppers in Korea, little research attention has been paid to this kind of research topic by academicians, because buying products or services through SNS is in its infancy. With regard to research populations, it would be difficult to generalise the research findings in Korea, owing to unbalanced respondent distribution. Considering the above research limitations as well as the growth of social shopping, many authors should pay considerable attention to SNS-related issues in the future, and develop the more sophisticated criteria to measure the characteristics of SNS shoppers.

keywords
Social Network Service, Social Shopping, SNS User, Online Shopping, Customer Attitudes

Reference

1.

Aggarwal, P. & Cha, T.(1998), “Asymmetric price competition and store vs national brand choice”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 7(3), 244-253.

2.

Ahmed, S.F., Uddin, M.M. & Ahshanullah, M.(2009), “Consumers Reaction to Product Variety: Does Culture Matter?”, International Business Research, 2(3), 115-120.

3.

Antheunis, M.L. & Schouten, A.P.(2011), “The Effects of Other-Generated and System-Generated Cues on Adolescents’ Perceived Attractiveness on Social Network Sites”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 391-406.

4.

Atlas, M.S. & Synder, C.R.(1978), “The effects of need for uniqueness upon valuation of scarce and non-scarce objects”, Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.

5.

Berkowitz, E.N. & Walton, J.R.(1980), “Contextual Influences on Consumer Price Responses: An Experimental Analysis”, Journal of Marketing Research, 17(3), 349-358.

6.

Bettman, J.R.(1974), “Relationship of information-processing attitude structures to private brand purchasing behaviour”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(1), 79-83.

7.

Boyd, D.(2004), “Fiendster and publicly articulated social networking” Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors and Computing System, Vienna, 24-29.

8.

Cha, J.(2009), “Shopping on Social Networking Websites: Attitudes Toward Real Versus Virtual Items”, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(1), 77-93.

9.

Chang,T. Z. & Wildt, A. R.(1994), “Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 16–27.

10.

Chang, Y.P. & Zhu, D.H.(2011), “Understanding social networking sites adoption in China: A comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption”, Computers in Human Behaviour, 27(5), 1840-1848.

11.

Chung, L.C. & Cho Y.S.(2011), “The effects of store image components on consumers purchasing retailer brands in Korea”, Journal of Distribution Science, 9(4), 15-27.

12.

Cialdini, R.B.(1985), Influence: Science and Practice, Glenview, IL:Scott, Foresman.

13.

Frank, R.E. & Boyd, H.W.(1965), “Are private-brand-prone grocery customers really different?”, Journal of Advertising Research, 5(4), 27-35.

14.

Fromkin, H.L.(1970), “Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 521-529.

15.

Grewal, D., Gotlieb, J. & Marmorstein, H.(1994), “The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-Perceived Risk Relationship”, Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 145-153.

16.

Hennig-Thurau. T, Gwinner. K.P., Walsh, G. & Gremler, D.D.(2004),“Electronic Word-of-Mouth Via Consumer-Opinion Platforms:What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on TheInternet”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.

17.

Iyengar, S.S. & Lepper, M.(1999), “Rethingking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349-366.

18.

Jansen, B.J., Sobel, K. & Cook, G.(2011), “Classifying ecommerce information sharing behavior by youths on social networking sites”, Journal of Information Science, 37(2), 120-136.

19.

Kaiser, H.F.(1958), “The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis”, Psychometrika, 23: 187-200.

20.

Kleck, C. A., Reese, C. A., Behnken, D. Z. & Sundar, S. S.(2007),“The company you keep and the image you project: Puttingyour best face forward in onlinesocial networks”, Paper presentedat the annual meeting of the International CommunicationAssociation, San Francisco.

21.

Kohut, A.(2008), Internet’s broader role in campaign 2008: Social networking and online videos take off, Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre.

22.

Korgaonkar, P.K.(1984), “Consumer shopping orientations, non-store retailers, and consumers patronage intentions: A multivariate investigation”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 12(1), 11-22.

23.

Lee, S.J., Youn, M.K. & Kim, W.K.(2012), “Antecedents to Customer Repurchase in Korean Social Commerce Service”, Journal of Distribution Science, 10(3), 7-13.

24.

Levav, J. & Ariely, D.(2000), “Sequential variety-seeking in group setting: taking the road less travelledand less enjoyed”, Journal of consumer Research, 27(3), 279-290.

25.

Li, C.(2007), “How consumers use social networks”, Forrester Research,21 June, available at: www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,41626,00.html(Accessed 27 September 2007).

26.

Liang, D.(2006), “Characteristics Differences between Taiwanese Generation Y Online Shoppers and Online Users”, The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 2(1), 193- 202.

27.

Mulhern, F.J. & Padgett, D.T.(1995), “The relationship between retail price promotions and regular price purchases”, Journal of Marketing, 59(4), 83–90.

28.

Nielsen(2008), “Trends in Online Shopping: a global Nielsen consumer report”.

29.

Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T.(1986), “The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.

30.

Reynolds, F. D.(1974), “An analysis of catalog buying behavior”, Journal of Marketing, 38(3), 47-51.

31.

Rha, H.S. & Cho, Y.S.(2011), “The effects of a manufacturer’s name on packaging on retailer brand attitudes and loyalty”, Korean Business Education Research, 26(5), 51-72.

32.

Rutledge, K.(2000), “Wooing teens to buy online has e-tailers seeing green”. In: Discount Store News, 39 (Lebhar-Friedman, Inc., New York), 1.

33.

Schonfeld. E.(2006), “Cyworld Ready to Attack MySpace”, Business2.0, July 27, http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/27/technology/cyworld0727.biz2/index.htm (accessed May 12, 2012).

34.

Sparks, L., Findlay, A., 2000. The future of Shopping, 2020 Visions of the future. RICS Research Foundation, London.

35.

Tapscott, D.(2008), “Net gen transforms marketing”, Business Week(Online)

36.

Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L. & Walther, J.B.(2008),“Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship BetweenNumber of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook”,Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3),531–549.

37.

Van heerde, H.J., Leeflang, P.S.H. & Wittink, D.R.(2000), “The Estimation of Pre- and Postpromotion Dips with Store-Level Scanner Data”, Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 383-395.

38.

Verhallen, T.M.M.(1982), “Scarcity and Consumer Choice Behavior”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(4), 299-322.

39.

Walters, R.G.(1991), “Assessing the Impact of Retail Price Promotions on Product Substitution, Complementary Purchase, and Interstore Sales Displacement”, Journal of Marketing, 55(2), 17-28.

40.

Wilkinson, J. B.. Mason, J.B. & Paksoy, C.H.(1982), “Assessing the Impact of Short-Term Supermarket Strategy Variables”, Journal of Marketing Research, 19(1), 72-86.

41.

Windischhofer, R. & Ruola, J.(2003), “Customer Value Enhancement Through E-Channels in the Groceries Retail Network”, Frontiers of e-Business Research 2002 Customer Value Enhancement Through E-Channels in the Groceries Retail Network, 517-536. Source: http://www.ebrc.info/kuvat/517-536.pdf

42.

Woodruff, R.B.(1997), “Customer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139-153.

43.

Zeithaml, V.A.(1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence”, Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.

The Journal of Distribution Science