- Log In/Sign Up
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS, ESCI
ISSN : 1738-3110
A Study on the Factors that Affect the Negotiation of Technology Trading for Promotion of Technology Transfer Commercialization
Abstract
Purpose - This Study aims to promote technology transfer commercialization and ultimately make contribution towards enhancement of the success rate of commercialization of technology transfer at national level by deducing the factors that impart influence on the negotiation at the time of technology trading between the seller and buyer of technology of public research institutions subjected to transfer and sales. Research design, data and methodology - This Study deduced 5 research hypotheses through preceding researches related to technology transfer commercialization related technology marketing for technology trading negotiation. This Study was conducted by verifying the hypotheses through multiple regression analysis. Results - As the result of the Study, the research hypothesis H1, 'Promotion of commercialization of technology transfer trading will be affected in accordance with the innate characteristic factors of the technology', and H5, 'Promotion of commercialization of technology transfer trading will be affected in accordance with the mutual factors of the parties of the technology trading', among the 5 research hypotheses were chosen. Conclusions - It was found that the technology seller must be able to demonstrate technological value of the technology being sold in order to successfully conclude technology transfer trading negotiation and mutual understanding and harmonious communication between the parties.
- keywords
- Technology Transfer Trading, Negotiation, Promotion of Technology Transfer Commercialization
Reference
2012 White Paper (2012). On Industrial R&D, Seoul, Korea: KOITA.
Ahn, Sung-Jo (2004). A Study on technology transfer performances and its determinants, Kyongsan, Korea: Thesis for Master in Yeungnam University.
Baer, W, Conover, c.J., Cook, C., Fleischauer, P., & Goeller, B. (1976). Analysis of Federally Funded Demonstration Projects, Final Report, 3, Santa Monica, USA:Rand Corp..
Bok, Dek-Goo (2008. 1). The Status of Open Innovation and Effect Analysis of Korea Manufacturing, SERI Issue Report.
Bozman, B. (2000). Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory. Research policy, 29(4-5), 627-655.
Brown, M.A, Berry, L.G., & Goel, R.K. (1991). Guidelines for Successfully Transferring Government-sponsored Innovation. Research Policy, 20(2), 121-143.
Chang, W. (1988).Tribute to John William Dyckman, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 7(2), 68-69.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Business Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, W.M., R. Florida R., L. Randazzese, L., & Walsh, J. (1998). Industry and the Academy: Uneasy Partners in the Cause of Technological Advance. In Roger Noll(ed.), Challenges to Research Universities (pp. 171-199). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Daghfous, A. (2004). An Empirical Investigation of the Roles of Prior Knowledge and Learning Activities in Technology Transfer. Technovation, 24(12), 939-953.
Erlich, J.N., and Gutterman, A. (2003). A Practical View of Strategies for Improving Federal Technology Transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3-4), 215-226.
Fredland, R.A. (2000). Technology Transfer to the Public Sector in Developing States: Three Phases. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(3), 265-275.
Greiner, M.A., and Franza, R.M. (2003). Barriers and Bridges for Successful Environmental Technology Transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(2), 167-177.
Gulliver, P. H. (1979). Disputes and Negotiations. New York : Academic Press.
Hwang, Nam-Gu, Oh, Young-Ho, & Kim, Kyoung-Jin (2010). A Study on the Factors Affecting the Success of Technology Marketing, The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 11(7), 1-13.
Hyon, Man-Sok, and Yoo Wang-Jin (2008). A Study on the Technology Transfer Efficiency for Public Institutes Using DEA Model. Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 31( 2), 94-103.
Jee, Sung-Won (2013). Comparative Analyses of Mass Marketing and Target Marketing Based on Price Elasticity and Production Cost. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(4), 61-72.
Jung, Sun-Yang (2008). A Study on the Major National S&T Policy Issues and Effective Response. KAIST Research Report 54, Daejeon, Korea: Korean Academy of Science and Technology.
Kang, Byoung-Seo (2000). Modern Statics Analysis Using SPSS and Internet. Seoul, Korea: Muyokkyoungsa.
Kil, Jae-Sik (2009). Open Innovation, Digital Times. Retrieved Jun 15, 2013, from http://.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2009010702011832741002
Kim, Byong-Seon (2008). The Strategy Build-up of Technology Commercialization Ecosystem in KETI. Technology Transfer Commercialization Magazine, KIAT. Retrieved August 30, 2013, from http://www.ntb.kr/zine/home/ contents. jsp?mu=1&mcate=1&scate=95&bcate=26
Kim, Jong-Kap (2005). A Study on the Factors Affecting the Performance of Public Technology Transfer to SMEs in Korea, Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Sungkyunkwan University.
Kim, Sang-Goo (2002). A Study on the Determinants of Negotiation Strategies: Conflicts Concerning the Location of Waste Treatment Facilities. The Korean Association for Public Administration, 36(2), 63-83.
Kim, Kyong-Hwan, Hyun, Sun-Hae, & Choi, Young-Jin (2006). Effects of Strategic Resources on Technology Commercialization. Korea Society of IT Service Journal, 5(3), 151-163.
Kim, Sang-Tae, and Hong, Woon-Sun (2013). A Comparative Study on Institutions for Technology Transfer of Korea and the U.S. : Exploring Cases of KAIST and the University of California. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 16(2), 44-475.
Kim, Young-Ki, Kim, Seung-Hee, & Lim, Jin (2011). A Study on the Meaning & Classification of Conventional Markets. Journal of Distribution Science, 9(2), 83-95.
Korea Technology Transfer Center (2013). KTTC Report.. Retrieved September 5, 2013, from http://terms.naver.com/entry. nhn?docId=1206102&cid=200000000&categoryId=2000047 71
Kremic, T. (2003). Technology Transfer : A Contextual Approach. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(2), 149-158.
Lim, Ju-Dong (2008). An exploratory case study on online supporting services affecting technology trade stimulation. Chonnam, Korea: Thesis for Master in Chonnam National University.
Lim, Kwon-Yol (2004). A Study on the determinants of Technology Transfer Success : In Case of Dual Use Technology. Daejeon, Korea:Thesis for Master in Chungnam National University.
Lee, Sang-Nam (2003). The analysis of effective factors on the technology transfer in Korean construction industry, Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Master in Seoul National University.
Ministry of Trade, Industry, ＆ Energy (2012). The Korean Law of Technology transfer and Commercialization Promotion. Retrieved July 6,2013, from http://www.law.go.kr/lsEfInfoP.do?lsi- Seq= 1122431#0000
Moon, Youn-hee, Choi, Sung-Ho, & Choi, Ji-Ho (2012). The Impact of Changes in Market shares among Retailing Types on the Price Index. Journal of Channel and Retailing, 17(2), 93-115.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Park, Jong-Wha (2004). The Regional Development Theory. Seoul, Korea: Parkyoungsa.
Paik, Son-U (2008). Identification of Factors Affecting Technology Licensing via Expert Survey. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 11(4), 476-509.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free press.
Pruitt, D. G., and Carnevaie, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in Social Conflict. Buckingham MK : Open University Press.
Rogers, E.M., Carayannis, E.G., Kurihara, K., & Allbritton, M.M. (1998). Cooperative Research and Development Agreements(CRADAs) as Technology Transfer Mechanisms. R&D Management, 28(2), 79-88.
Schmiemann, M., and Durvy, J. (2003). New Approaches to Technology Transfer from Publicly Funded Research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 9-15.
Seo, You-Hwa (2006). A study on the factors affecting commercialization success or failure of CT SMEs and Ventures. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Master in Hoseo University.
Sim, Tae-Ho (2004). A study on the effect of organizational & product attributes on the commercialization and its outcomes in Korean information technology firms, Seoul, Korea:Thesis for Master in Yonsei University.
So, Byeong-Woo, and Yang, Dong-Woo (2009). The Empirical Study on Relationship between Intellectual Property Management Activities and Technology Transfer Performance of the University. Korean journal of Business Administration, 22(2), 889-912. Son, Soo-Jung, Lee, Yun-Joo, Jung, Seoung-IL, & Lim,
cha-Youn (2009.8). Recommendation for Promoting Technology Commercialization, Policy Research, STEPI.
Suh, Sang-Hyuk (2011, Summer). The Principle & Technique for Technology Marketing, Technology Transfer Commercialization Magazine, KIAT. Retrieved May 20, 2013, from http://www.ntb.kr/zine/home/contents. jsp?mu=1&mcate=1&scate=572&bcate=47
Thursby, J.G., Jenson, R., & Thursby, M.C. (2001). Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing : A Survey of Major U.S. University. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 59-72.
Zaho, L., and Reddy, N.M. (1993). Managing International Technology Transfer Negotiation: A Social Exchange Perspective, Technovation, 13(6), 383-397.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations