바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Impacts of Innovative EU Companies on Smaller Emerging Markets under an Open Economy

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.10, pp.37-45
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.10.201410.37
Seo, Dae-Sung
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to analyze the relationship between trends in innovative EU industries and market distribution in smaller emerging markets under an open economy. Research design, data, and methodology - Although innovation was well-distributed, due to socio-economic factors following European integration, CEE had not achieved sustainable economic growth. However, this paper analyzes the differences among changes in CEE innovation for smaller emerging markets dominated since 2000. Market distribution has facilitated new markets for innovative industries, according to EU surveys and economic indicators. Results - The dominance of the local industrial market distribution has deterred innovation investment the survey shows that innovation investment has been shrinking, despite the EU's open innovation policy for CEE employment and R&D. For the CEE case, there were expectation gaps and uncertainty about whether to use the new distribution dominance or TNCs' innovation in smaller emerging countries without local industrial innovation. Conclusions - Innovation generates market growth and distribution power however, small growth requires stimulation, and creativity and innovative edge need further focus in local public and corporate strategy.

keywords
TNC, Small Emerging Market, Innovation, EU Companies, CEE, Confidence, Distribution Activity

Reference

1.

Bender, Thomas,& Schorske, Carle E. (1994). Budapest and New York : Studies in Metropolitan Transformation 1870-1930. New York : The Russel Sage Foundation.

2.

Eurobarometer (2011). Public Opinion in the European Union &Innovation Union Scoreboard, 76. Retrieved March 1, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb76/eb76_std_part1.pdf.

3.

European Commisson (2009). Health & Consumer Protection Directorate–General. June, 2009. Retrieved March 1, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/index_en.htm.

4.

Halpern, L., & Muraközy, B. (2012). Inn.ovation, Productivity and Exports : the Case of Hungary. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(2), 151–173.

5.

Hungarian Central Statistic Office (2011). Satitistical reflection. (5)4, 2011/2010. Retrieved May 14, 2014 from http://www.ksh.hu/docs/eng/xftp/stattukor/okt/eokt1011.pdf.

6.

Hungarian Central Statistic Office (2014a). International goods transport in Hungary (2001–2013). Statistic Data. Retrieved May 15, 2014 from http://www.ksh.hu/docs/eng/xstadat/xstadat_annual/i_odmv002.html.

7.

Hungarian Central Statistic Office (2014b). Satitistical reflection, retail trade, (61). Retrieved May 15, 2014 from http://www.ksh.hu/docs/eng/xftp/stattukor/kisker/ekisker1407.pdf.

8.

Innobarometer (2009). Analytical report, Flash EB, 267. Retrieved March 10, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_267_en.pdf.

9.

Innobarometer (2014). The Role of Public support in the Commercialistion of Innovations, Flash EB, 394 (TNS Political & Social). Retrieved September 1, 2014 from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_394_en.pdf.

10.

Innovation union scoreboard (2011). The Innovation Union's performance scoreboard for Research and Innovation. IUS report. Retrieved March 1, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius-2011_en.pdf.

11.

Katalin, N. P. (2010). Measurement of Innovation Activity at Hungarian Companies. Budapest : Corvinus University of Budapest press.

12.

Kim, H. G., & Oh, J. H. (2004). The role of IT on the Korean economy under IMF control. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26 (2), 181-190.

13.

Kim, S. H. (2013). TheEffect of Service Innovativeness of IT Service Centers: Mediating Role of Behavior Intention. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(10), 17-25.

14.

Kovács, K. (2013). US Screening and Evaluation system of Inventions Utilized in Hungary. Budapest Management Review, 44(10), 24-36.

15.

Lee, J. (2013). A Global Perspective on Green Sustainability, Corporate Reputation, and Technological Strength for Firm Performance Across Countries. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(8), 15-23.

16.

Lengyel, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Regional innovation systems in Hungary: The failing synergy at the national level. Regional Studies, 45(5), 677-693.

17.

Mettam, G. R., & Adams, L. B. (1994). How to prepare an electronic version of your article: Introduction to the electronic age. New York : E-Publishing Inc, 281-304.

18.

Munchau, Wolfgang (2014). Europe will feel the pain of emerging markets, Financial Times. Retrieved February 2, 2014 from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/58bfa7ec-89e9-11e3-abc4-00144feab7de.html#axzz3Ebvbyb5n.

19.

Seo, Daesung (2012). The effect of Eurobarometer in according with the EU innovation industry policy on CEE (Hungary)under a small open economy. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1078-1083. Retieved September 2, 2014 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812036257

20.

Stephan, J., & Jindra, B. (2005). Knowledge transfer to MNE subsidiaries based in CEE-Integrating knowledge-based and organisational perspectives. Journal of Economics and Business, 8 (1, 2), 11-18.

21.

Strojwas, M. (2010). The Polish banking system: hit by the crisis or merely by a cool breeze?. ECFIN Country Focus, 7(2). Retieved June 2, 2014 from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/country_focus/2010/pdf/cf-7-02_en.pdf.

The Journal of Distribution Science