바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

The Relationship of Individual Trait Factors and Goal Mechanisms with Goal Attainability

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.11, pp.45-53
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.11.201411.45
Park, Jong-Chul
Choi, Ji-Eun

Abstract

Purpose - Goal setting is effective in any domain in which an individual or group has some control over the outcomes. It applies not only to work tasks but also to sports and health, and in various other settings. Its success depends on considering the mediators and moderators determining its efficacy and applicability. This study investigates the individual factors influencing academic goal attainability. Unlike previous studies, we focused on the effect of the relationships between individual traits (passion, tenacity, self-control) and specific motivation (vision, self-efficacy, implementation intentions) with academic goal attainability, rather than the effects of the relationship between commitment and the goal shielding mechanism with goal attainability. Research design, data, and methodology - Data collected through questionnaires were analyzed by the SPSS program. A total of 293 school students, who participated in the TOEIC program, participated in the survey. Slightly more than half were female (male: n=145 vs. female: n=148). We verified nine hypotheses through various statistical methods (reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation model for the hypothesis test, bootstrapping test for the mediation test). Results - Data was analyzed in three phases. The first phase involved measurement analysis (i.e., item purification and factor structure confirmation), involving the scales of the three variables of individual traits, three mechanism variables, and goal attainability. The second phase involved estimating the proposed structural relationships among the key constructs (see Figure 1), using the results to test H1 to H9. The final phase involved examining the mediating effects of the three variables (vision, implementation intention, and self-efficacy). The research model shows that the independent variable passion has a significant result with both the mediators-vision and self-efficacy. Further, vision and self-efficacy significantly affect goal attainability. The second variable, self-control, shows a significant effect when mediated by implementation intentions, but the direct relationship between implementation intension and goal attainability shows an insignificant result. However, when further mediated by self-efficacy, it showed a significant effect between self-efficacy and goal attainability. Similarly, the third variable, tenacity, shows an insignificant result when mediated by vision. In contrast, the mediator self-efficacy shows a positive effect between tenacity and goal attainability. Conclusions - This study shows how these individual traits, when mediated with the appropriate motivational factors, resulted significantly in the attainability of academic goals. We may identify several theoretical and practical contributions. Theoretically, we developed a step further in the research into consumer goals and related studies. Future research could examine the effects of different learning goal types and their combinations with performance goals (e.g., learning goals first, then performance goals), different types of goal framing (approach success vs. avoid failure), the relation between goals and cognition (which, by implication, entails all of cognitive psychology), goal hierarchies, and macro goal studies with organizations of different sizes. More studies on the relationship between conscious and subconscious goals would also be valuable.

keywords
Goal setting, Passion, Tenacity, Self-control, Implementation intentions, Vision, Self-efficacy, Goal Attainability

Reference

1.

Achtziger, A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran P. (2008), Implementation Intentions and Shielding Goal Striving From Unwanted Thoughts and Feelings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(3), 381-393.

2.

Aldrich, H. E., & Wiedenmayer, G. (1993). From Traits to Rates:An Ecological Perspective on Organizational Foundings. In Kaz J. A. & Brockhaus Sr R. H. (Eds), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth(pp. 145-195). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

3.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavior Change. Psychological Review, 84(March), 191-215.

4.

Baum, J. R., Lock, E. A., & Kirkapatrik, S. (1998). A Longitudinal Study of the Relation of Vision and Vision Communication to Venture Growth in Entrepreneurial Firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 43-54.

5.

Baum, J. R., & Lock, E. A. (2004). The Relationship of Entrepreneurial Traits, Skill, and Motivation to Subsequent Venture Growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587-598.

6.

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M (2007). The Strength Model of Self-Control. Psychological Science, 16(6), 351-355.

7.

Carlson, K. A., Meloy, M. G., & Miller, E. G. (2013). Goal Reversion in Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(February), 918-930.

8.

Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. (1991). Organizational Vision and Visionary Organizations. California Management Review, 34, 30-52.

9.

Feather, N. T. (1990). Bridging the Gap Between Values and Actions. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (pp.151-192), New York: Guilford Press.

10.

Filion, L. J. (1991). Vision and Relations: Elements for an Entrepreneurial Meta Model. International Small Business Journal, 9, 112-131.

11.

Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R. (2005). Goals as Excuses or Guides:The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(December), 370-377.

12.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. E. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

13.

Gollwitzer, P. M.(1999). Implementation Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plants. American Psychology, 54, 493-503.

14.

House, R. J., and Shamir, B. (1993), Toward the Integration of Transformational, Charismatic and Visionary Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions. San Diego, CA:Academic Press.

15.

Jung, M. E., & Brawley, L. R. (2013). Concurrent Self-Regulatory Efficacy as a Mediator of the Goal:Exercise Behaviour Relationship. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(5), 601-611.

16.

Locke, E. A. (2000). The Prime Movers. New York: Amacom.

17.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.

18.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265-268.

19.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.

20.

Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (1996). Assessing Goodness of Fit:Is Parsimony Always Desirable?. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 364-390.

21.

Mento, A. J., Lock, E. A.,& Klein, H. J. (1992). The Relationship of Goal Level to Valence and Instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 395-405.

22.

Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-Regulation and Depletion of Limited Resources: Does Self-Control Resemble a Muscle?. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247–259.

23.

Myrseth, S. E., & Fishbach, A. (2009) Self-Control: A Function of Knowing When and How to Exercise Restraint. Psychological Science, 18(4), 247-253.

24.

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypothesis: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227.

25.

Shah, J. Y., Friedman, R., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Forgetting All Else: On the Antecedents and Consequences of Goal Shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1261-1280.

26.

Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, Need-satisfaction, and Longitudinal Well-being: The Self-concordance Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482-497.

27.

Smilor, R. W. (1997). Entrepreneurship: Reflections on a Subversive Activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 341-346.

28.

Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. (2004). High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324.

29.

Timmons, J. A. (2000), New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship 2000(5th ed.), Homewood, IL: Irwin.

30.

Wilcox, K., Vallen, B. Block, L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2009). Vicarious Goal Fulfillment: When the Mere Presence of a Health Option Leads to an Ironically Indulgent Decision. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(October), 380-393.

31.

Zhang, Y., & Huang, S. (2010). How Endowed versus Earned Progress Affects Consumer Goal Commitment and Motivation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(December), 641-654.

The Journal of Distribution Science