바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

The Effects of TSI(Transaction Specific Investment) on Dependence, Trust, Commitment and Re-Contract Intention

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.12, pp.19-26
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.12.201412.19
Yang, Jeong-Seok
Lee, Sang-Youn

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to test the effects of Korean food service franchisors' and franchisees' TSI (Transaction Specific Investment) on dependence and trust toward the franchisor and re-contract intention. The study examines the effects of both franchisors' and franchisees' TSI on dependence and trust, as compared with Ganesan (1994). Research design, data, and methodology - Data were collected from 495 Korean food service franchisees and analyzed with structural equation modeling using path analysis through SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0. Results - 1) The franchisor's TSI has positive effects on the franchisee's dependence and trust toward the franchisor. 2) The franchisee's TSI has a positive effect on the franchisee's dependence toward the franchisor. 3) The franchisee's dependence and trust have positive effects on commitment. 4) The franchisee's dependence, trust, and commitment have a positive effect on re-contract intention. Conclusions - The franchisor's and franchisee's TSI affect the franchisee's dependence and trust toward the franchisor. The franchisee's dependence and trust influence commitment and re-contract intention. This has managerial implications for franchisors striving to raise franchisees' re-contract intention.

keywords
Dependence, Trust, TSI, Re-Contract Intention, Franchise

Reference

1.

Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1992). Assumption and comparative strengths of the two-step approach. Sociological Methods and Research, 30(3), 321-333.

2.

Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42-58.

3.

Bendapudi, N., & Berry, L. L. (1997). Customers’ motivations for maintaining relationships with service providers. Journal of Retailing, 73(l), 15-37.

4.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2000). Acceptance of e-commerce services:The case of electronic brokerages. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(4), 411-420.

5.

Chiou, Jyh-Shen, & Droge, C. (2006). Service Quality, Trust, Specific Asset Investment, and Expertise: Direct and Indirect Effects in a Satisfaction-Loyalty Framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, October 34, 613-627.

6.

Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–52.

7.

Eyuboglu, N., & Buja, A. (2007). Quasi-darwinian selection in marketing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 48-61.

8.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

9.

Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19.

10.

Goodman, J. (1980). Franchisor-frachisee conflicts of interest as perceived by selected non-food franchisees. Dissertation Abstract International, University, Micro Films, No.41/02a.

11.

Gundlach, G. T., and E. R. Cadotte. (1994). Exchange interdependence and interfirm interaction: Research in a simulated channel setting. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 516–532.

12.

Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1988). The role of dependence balancing in safeguarding Transaction-Specific Assets in conventional channels. Journal of Marketing, 52(January), 20-35.

13.

Jones, T. O., & Sasser Jr. W. E. (1995). Why satisfied customers defect. Havard Business Review, November-December, 88-99.

14.

Klein, S., Fraizier, G. L., and Roth, V. J. (1990). A transaction cost analysis medel of channel integration in international markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 196-208.

15.

Lewis, C., and Lambert, D. (1991). A model of channel member performance, dependence, and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 67(1), 205-224.

16.

Lyu, Myoung-Keun, & Yang, Hoe-Chang (2013). The Effect of Trust and Justice on Relation Satisfaction and Long-term Commitment in Franchise Business. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(1), 25-34.

17.

Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research:The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314-328.

18.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.

19.

Oh, Sejo, & Kang, Bohyeon (2009). The Mediating Role of Dependence and Conflict in the Relationship of Relationship, Termination Cost, Alternative Attractiveness, Goal Incongruity, Unfairness, and Dissolution Intention. Marketing Research, March, 181-201.

20.

Rosenberg, L., & Czepiel, J. A. (1984). A marketing approach in customer retention. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1(2), 45-51.

21.

Sheng, S., Brown J. R., & Nicholson C. Y. (2006). Do exchange hazards always foster relational governance?: An empirical test of the role of communication. International Journal of Research in marketing, 23, 63-77.

22.

Smith J. B. & Barclay D. W. (1997). The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationship. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 3–21.

23.

Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595–-608.

24.

Van Lange C. R,, Rusbult C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939-954.

25.

Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organizations: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548-577.

The Journal of Distribution Science