바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on the Financial Strength of Households on House Investment Demand

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.4, pp.31-39
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.4.201404.31
Rho, Sang-Youn
Yoon, Bo-Hyun
Choi, Young-Min
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This study investigates the following two issues. First, we attempt to find the important determinants of housing investment and to identify their significance rank using survey panel data. Recently, the expansion of global uncertainty in the real estate market has directly and indirectly influenced the Korean housing market; households demonstrate a sensitive reaction to changes in that market. Therefore, this study aims to draw conclusions from understanding how the impact of financial strength of the household is related to house investment. Second, we attempt to verify the effectiveness of diverse indices of financial strength such as DTI, LTV, and PIR as measures to monitor the housing market. In the continuous housing market recession after the global crisis, the government places top priority on residence stability. However, the government still imposes forceful restraints on indices of financial strength. We believe this study verifies the utility of these regulations when used in the housing market. Research design, data, and methodology - The data source for this study is the "National Survey of Tax and Benefit" from 2007 (1st) to 2011 (5th) by the Korea Institute of Public Finance. Based on this survey data, we use panel data of 3,838 households that have been surveyed continuously for 5 years. We sort the base variables according to relevance of house investment criteria using the decision tree model (DTM), which is the standard decision-making model for data-mining techniques. The DTM method is known as a powerful methodology to identify contributory variables for predictive power. In addition, we analyze how important explanatory variables and the financial strength index of households affect housing investment with the binary logistic multi-regressive model. Based on the analyses, we conclude that the financial strength index has a significant role in house investment demand. Results - The results of this research are as follows: 1) The determinants of housing investment are age, consumption expenditures, income, total assets, rent deposit, housing price, habits satisfaction, housing scale, number of household members, and debt related to housing. 2) The impact power of these determinants has changed more or less annually due to economic situations and housing market conditions. The level of consumption expenditure and income are the main determinants before 2009; however, the determinants of housing investment changed to indices of the financial strength of households, i.e., DTI, LTV, and PIR, after 2009. 3) Most of all, since 2009, housing loans has been a more important variable than the level of consumption in making housing market decisions. Conclusions - The results of this research show that sound financing of households has a stronger effect on housing investment than reduced consumption expenditures. At the same time, the key indices that must be monitored by the government under economic emergency conditions differ from those requiring monitoring under normal market conditions; therefore, political indices to encourage and promote the housing market must be divided based on market conditions.

keywords
Housing Demand, DTI, LTV, Data Mining, Logit Regression

Reference

1.

Bajari, P., Chan,P., Krueger, D., & Miller.D., (2013). A Dynamic Model of Housing Demand: Estimation and Policy Implications. International Economic Review, 54(2), 409-442.

2.

Benjamin, J., Chinloy, P., & Jud, D. (2004). Real Estate versus Financial Wealth in Consumption. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 29(3), 341-351.

3.

Carroll, S., & Li, W. (2011). The Home Ownership Experience of Households in Bankruptcy. Cityscape, 13(1), 113–134

4.

Case, K., Quigley, J., & Shiller, R. (2005). Comparing Wealth Effects: The Stock Market versus the Housing Market. Advances in Macroeconomics, 5, 1-34.

5.

Chambers, M., Garriga, C., & Schlagenhauf, D. (2009). Accounting for Changes in the Home Ownership Rate. International Economic Review, 50, 677-726.

6.

Chambers, M., Garriga, C., & Schlagenhauf, D. (2009). The Loan Structure and Housing Tenure Decisions in an Equilibrium Model of Mortgage Choice. Review of Economic Dynamics, 12, 444-468.

7.

Chambers, M., Garriga, C., & Schlagenhauf, D. (2009). The Tax Treatment of Home owners and Landlords and the Progressivity of Income Taxation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53, 1425-1450.

8.

Chung, Eui-Chul, & Cho, Sung-Jin (2005). Demographic Changes and Long-term Housing Demand in Korea. The Journal of Korea Planners Association, 40(3), 37-46.

9.

Garriga, C., & Schlagenhauf, D. (2009) Home Equity, Foreclosures, and Bailouts. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

10.

Hurst, E., & Stafford, F. (2004). Home Is Where the Equity Is:Mortgage Refinancing and Household Consumption. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36, 985-1014.

11.

Jeong, Bu-Gyun, & Choi, Min-Seub (2013). Prediction of Housing Demand through Classifying Household Types. Journal of the Korea Real Estate Analysts Association, 19(1), 133-147.

12.

Jeong, Yeon-Jin (2007). A Study on Housing Demand and Supply Policy Considering the Family Life Cycle. Community Development Review, 32(1), 31-48.

13.

Jeske, K., Krueger, D., & Mitman, K. (2011). Housing and the Macroeconomy: The Role of Implicit Guarantees for Government Sponsored Enterprises. Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.

14.

Kim, Jae-Gyeong (2013). An Empirical Analysis on the Relationship between Stock Price, Interest Rate, Price Index and Housing Price using VAR Model. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(10), 63-72.

15.

Kim, Jung-Soo, & Lee, Joo-Hyung (2004). A Study on the Effect of Household Characteristics on Housing Choice. The Journal of Korea Planners Association, 39(1), 191-204.

16.

Lee, Chang-Moo, & Park, Ji-Young (2009). An Estimation Model of Long-Term Housing Demand Considering Household Types. The Journal of Korea Planners Association, 44(5), 149-161.

17.

Li, Wenli, Liu, Haiyong, & Yao, Rui (2009). Housing over time and over the life cycle: a structural estimation. No. 09-7. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

18.

Li, W., & Yao, R. (2007). The Life-Cycle Effects of House Price Changes. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 39(6), 1375-1409.

19.

Luengo-prada, M. (2006). Durables, Nondurables, Down Payments and Consumption Excesses. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(7), 1509-1539.

20.

Mahdi, S., & Fezeh, Z. F. (2013). Data Mining Approach Using Practical Swarm Optimization (PSO) to Predicting Going Concern: Evidence from Iranian Companies. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(3), 5-11.

21.

Mankiw, N. G. (1982). Hall's consumption hypothesis and durable goods. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10(3), 417-425.

22.

Park, Chun-gyu, Lee, Soo-wook, & Sohn, Kyung-hwan (2009). An Analysis of Housing Demand Functions Considering Family Life Cycle. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 60(0), 171-187.

23.

Park, Sang-Su, & Im, Min-Young (2013). Converting lease demand and tax support plan. Korea Institute of Local Finance Research Paper, 2013(4), 1-131.

24.

Park, Yeung-Kurn, Kim, Pan-Jun, & Hwang, Tae-Soo (2007). Effects of Housing Environment on Value, Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention of Housing. Journal of Distribution Science, 5(1), 89-105.

The Journal of Distribution Science