바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Exploratory Factor Analysis of SME Internationalization: Factor Differences between AEO and Non-AEO Authorized Companies

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.7, pp.5-12
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.7.201407.5
Son, Sung-Kyun
Kim, Tae-Joong
Kim, So-Hyung
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This study identified internationalization factors forKorean SMEs and explored factor differences between AEO and non-AEO authorized companies. Research design, data, and methodology - The study was designed to assess internationalization factors for AEO authorization in Korea through a questionnaire survey and an empirical analysis. The questionnaires were conducted for AEO and Non-AEO authorized companies that were undergoing AEO authorization. The study was conducted through e-mail and AEO manager education classes. Ninety-five questionnaires were collected. We employed the exploratory factor analysis methodology to derive internationalization factors for KoreanSMEs, and explored the factor differences between AEO and Non-AEO authorized companies. Results - AEO authorized companies outperformed Non-AEO authorized companies in R&D and technology. This indicated that AEO authorized companies were recognized as reliable and safe companies by the Korea Customs Service and other Customs services in trade facilitation and customs clearance processes. Conclusions - This study has some implications for AEO authorization and internationalization processes, and involved the empirical analysis of SMEs and the exploratory factor analysis in the internationalization process.

keywords
AEO, SME, Internationalization Factors, International Authorization

Reference

1.

Cavusgil, S. T. (1980).On the Internationalization Process of Firms. European Research, 8(6), 273~281.

2.

Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163~190. Harris,

3.

R.I.D., & Q. Li. (2007). Firm Level Empirical Study of the Contribution of Exporting to UK Productivity Growth. Report to UK Trade and Investment.

4.

Hymer, S. H. (1976). The International operations of National Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment. Cambridge, MS : MIT Press.

5.

Johanson, J., &Valne, J. E. (1977). The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23~32.

6.

Kim, C. B., & Chun, H. Y. (2012). An Empirical Study on Factors Affecting Activation of Authorized Economic Operator of Korean Export-Import Company. Korea Trade Research Association, 37(1), 203~228.

7.

Kim, C. B., & Chun, H. Y. (2010). Study on the achievements and changes of AEO introduction in Supply Chain Management. Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management, 13(1), 133~159,

8.

Kim, S. H., Kim, P. J., & Na, S.H. (2009). The International Strategies for Venture Business. Journal of Distribution Science, 7(3), 101-122.

9.

Kim S. H.(2014). Governance Mechanisms and Opportunism in Inter-firm Relational Exchanges. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(1), 5~12.

10.

Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (1996). The Born Global firm: A Challenge to Traditional Internationalization Theory. Advances in International Marketing, 8(1), 11~26.

11.

Knickerbocker, F. T. (1973). Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise. The International Executive, 15(2), 7~19.

12.

Lee, E.S., & Lee, K.K. (2013). A Study of cross border Trade in Second-hand Goods. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(11), 89~99.

13.

Lee, H.J., Yoon, J. H., & Yeo, T. D. (2011). The Impact of Internationalization Determinants of Export SMEs in Daegu and Gyongbuk on Internationalization Performance. International Commerce and Information Review, 13(4), 435~462.

14.

Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), 565~586.

15.

McKinsey & Co. (1993). Emerging Exporters: Australia's High Value-Added Manufacturing Exporters. Melbourne:McKinsey and Co., Australian Manufacturing Council.

16.

McDougall, P.P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B.M. (1994). Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), 469-487.

17.

Oviatt, B.M., & McDougall, P.P. (1994). Toward a Theory on International New Ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 45~64.

18.

Oviatt, B.M., & McDougall, P.P. (1999). A framework for understanding accelerated international entrepreneurship. Global Strategic Management, 7, 23~40.

19.

Preece, S.B., Miles, G., & Baetz, M.C. (1999). Explaining the International Intensity and Global Diversity of Early-stage Technology-based Firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3), 259~281.

20.

Reynolds, P.D. (1997). New and small firms in expanding markets. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 79~84.

21.

Sullivan, D. (1994). Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 325~342.

22.

Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Life Cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 190~207.

23.

Vernon, R. (1979). The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a new International Environment. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41(4), 255~267.

The Journal of Distribution Science