바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Brand Equity and Consumer Attitude

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.8, pp.17-29
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.8.201408.17
Park, Nam-Goo
Choi, Ho-Gyu
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - The use of corporate social activities to implement the concept of corporate social responsibility enhances brand equity and attitude, and strengthens economic competitiveness. In areas such as mobile communications, companies take the responsibility of protecting customers and enhance the quality of the mobile communication service, helping to make an effort to obey the regulations of the public trade order and fair trade agreement, enabling a healthy society through communication with elderly living alone or youths without parents, and enhancing marketing strategies. Research design, data, and methodology - To test the hypothesis, a survey was conducted. The surveyed population includes people who use the big three mobile communication services. The survey was conducted from October 4th to October 14th, 2013. A total of 500 survey questionnaires were circulated and 483 were collected; out of these, 32 were excluded due to missing or incomprehensible information. The data was analyzed with SPSS 18.0 via frequency analysis, trust analysis, search factor analysis, relationship analysis, confirmation factor analysis using AMOS 18.0, and structural equation model analysis. Results - Research on corporate social responsibility has been frequently conducted recently. Companies are perceived as social constituents satisfying the social desires of people in addition to customer needs. Further, companies are returning profits to society to satisfy community needs, because there is greater emphasis on the social responsibilities of companies. Companies' social responsibilities should include marketing strategies and the identification of customer needs. This study shows that social service activities influence brand value, which influences customer attitudes; therefore, social service activities indirectly influence customer attitudes. In order to increase customers' purchasing intention, it is essential to improve brand image via social services and provide a distinctive quality of service. Conclusions - This research has used the purposive selection method in the empirical analysis to identify the effect of social services on brand value and customer attitude. Therefore, this study revealed that businesses, whose ultimate objective is to improve customers' purchasing intention, should promote their brand equity through corporate social responsibility activities and offer a distinct service quality. Limitations in the progress of research were found and future indications to overcome these limitations are suggested as follows. First, survey responders had a limited understanding of social responsibilities; therefore, this concept needs to be explained to people first. Second, the research was done on people who live in Daejeon; thus, it is not representative of the entire country. The research has to be repeated with people in other cities. Third, there is a limitation in the study because the purposive selection method was used on Daejeon customers. In the future, a more precise selection of the population is needed. Fourth, Daejeon has unique geographical and size characteristics. Thus, customers in Seoul and other areas may display different characteristics and research on them may reveal different findings. Therefore, again, this study has to be repeated in other areas.

keywords
CSR, Brand Equity, Consumer Attitude

Reference

1.

Aaker, D. A.(1991). Managing Brand Equity Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: The Free Press.

2.

Aaker, D. A.(1992). The Value of Brand Equity. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(4), 27-32.

3.

Allport G. W.(1935). Attitudes in C Murchison: A Handbook of Social Psychology. Mass: Clart Univ. Press, 804-805.

4.

An, kwang-ho(2002). Principles of Advertising. Seoul, Korea:Bobmunsa.

5.

Ban, Hye-Jung, & Kim, Seog-Soo(2009). Corporate Social Responsibility As a Source of Firm's Competitive Advantage. Korea Journal of Business Administration, 22(4), 2037-2058.

6.

Barnea, A. & Rubin, A.(2006). Corporate Social Responsibility ad a Conflict Between Shareholders, Working Paper. Claremont McKenna College.

7.

Barone, M. J, Miyazaki, A. D, & Taylor, K. A.(2000). The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248-262.

8.

Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sankar, Sen(2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9-24.

9.

Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A.(1997). The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.

10.

Carroll, A. B.(1979). The Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.

11.

Cho, Hee-Jea, Moon, Ji-Won, & Jeong, Ho-Sang(2007). Conditions of Sustained Growth Companies: CSR, Samsung Economic Research Institute, 620.

12.

Cobb-Walgren, C. J, Ruble, C. A, & Donthu, N.(1995). Brand Equity, Brand Preference, and Purchase Intent. Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 25-40.

13.

Dahlsurd. A.(2008). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined. An Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1-13.

14.

Dan, P., & Stanley, P.(2007). An Empirical Examination of Public Attitude Toward Advertising in A Transitional Economy. International Journal of Advertising, 26(2), 247-276

15.

Drumwright, M. E.(1996). Company Advertising With a Social Demension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria. Journal of Marketing, 60, (October), 71-87.

16.

Hair, J. F Jr, Black, W. C, Babin, B. J, Anderson, R. E, & Tatham, R. L.(2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th Edition). New Jersey: Pearson International Edition, Inc.

17.

Han, Eun-Kyung, & Yoo, Eun-Ha(2003). A Study on the Effect of the Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Purchase Intention. Journal of Tourism Research, 60, 155-177.

18.

Han, Hye-Jung(1995). An Analysis Impact Advertising of Label Switching Process, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Chung Ang University.

19.

Heppen, P, Joost, M. E., & Meulenberg, M.(2003). Consumers Evaluations of Socially Responsible Activities in Retailing. Man Sholt Working Papers.

20.

Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L.(2002). Building Brand Equity Through Corporate Societal Marketing. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 21(1), 78-89.

21.

Hou, J., Du, L., & Tian, Z.(2009). The Effect if Nonprofit Brand Equity on Individual Intention: Mediating by The Self-Concept of Individual Donor. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Service Marketing, 14(3), 215-229.

22.

Hwang, Ho-Chan(2009). Value Relevance of Non-financial Information Focusing on the Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Finance and Accounting Information, 27(3), 215-236.

23.

Jang, Sun-Ku, & Seok, Sang-Hun(2007). The Evolution and New Integral Approach on CSR. Journal of the business historians, 22(3), 261-284.

24.

Jeong, Se-Jin(2008). Possible Effects of Significance and Non-significance of Menu Naming on Product Brand Attitudes and Purchase Intention. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Kyung Hee University.

25.

Jill, K., & Nirai, D.(2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers` Attributions and Brand Evaluations in a Product- harm Crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203-217.

26.

Jung, Yoon, & Park, Jong-Won(2011). The Impact of Consumer Attitude toward Apartment Advertising on Apartment Brand Equity, Journal of korea real estate academy, 44, 268-283.

27.

Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A.(2003). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity (2nd ed.), New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

28.

Keller, K. L.(1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Customer Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.

29.

Kim, Chul-Won, & Lee, Tae-Suk(2005). A Study on the Brand Equity of Tourist Hotel, Korea Academic Society of Tourism. Journal of Tourism Research, 20(2), 103-124.

30.

Kim, Seong-Jin, & Kim, Jong-Keun(2010). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate. Asia Marketing Journal, 11(4), 49-67.

31.

Kim, Sung-Yeon(1997). A Study on the Influence of Green Advertising on the Attitude of Consumers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Dongduk Woman's University.

32.

Kitchin, T.(2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: a Brand Explanation. Brand Management, 10(4), 312-326.

33.

Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E.(2005). Cause-brand alliances:does the cause helf the brand or does the brand helf the case. Journal of Business Research, 58, 423-429.

34.

REF033335472Lee, Hyuk-Jin, & Choi, Young-Hwan(2011). A Study on Tourism Event of Korea World Travel Fair in 2010, Journal of the Association of Korean Photo-Geographers, 21(1), 105-116.

35.

Lee, Hyung-Seok, & Kim, Seon-Min(2009). Application of AHP to the Constructs of Brand Equity of Mobile Telecom Service Companies: focused on the Implementation of Service Quality, Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, 20(1), 63-84.

36.

Lee, Kyung-Hee(2009). The Impact of CSR on Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavor in Franchise Industry, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Sejong University.

37.

Lee, Sang-Bin(2007). The Relationships Between Corporate Image Equity : A Comparison of Influence on Brand Attitude and Purchase Intention, Advertising Research, 76, 97-118.

38.

Lee, Seung-Hee, & Kim, Mi-Young(2006). The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Equity, The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 14(4), 684-697.

39.

Lyu, Eun-A(2011). A Study on the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Purchase Intention. Journal of Tourism Research, 12(1), 134-153.

40.

Mackenzie, S. E., Lutz, R., & Belch, G. E.(1986). The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanation. Journal of Marketing Research, l23(May), 130-143.

41.

Martinez, E., Montaner, T., & Pina, J. M.(2009). Brand extension feedback :Therole of advertising. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 305-313.

42.

McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D.(2001). Corporate Social Responsibility; A Theory of Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 117-127.

43.

Melo, T., & Galan, J. I.(2011). Effects of corporate social responsibility on brand value. Journal of Brand Management, 18(6), 423-437.

44.

Middlemiss, N.(2003). Authentic not Cosmetic: CSR as Brand Enhancement. Brand Management, 10(4-5), 353-361.

45.

Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C.(1981). Are Product Attitude Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318-332.

46.

Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J.(2005). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consumer Responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121-147.

47.

Murray, K. B., & Vogel, C. M.(1997). Using a Hierarchy-of-Effects Approach to Gauge the Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility to Generate Goodwill Toward the Firm: Financial Versus Non Financial Impacts. Journal of Business Research, 38(2), 141-159.

48.

Pappu, R., Quester, P. G., & Cooksey, R. W.(2005). Consumer-Based Brand Equity: Improving the Measurement-Empirical Evidence. Journal of Product &Brand Management, 14(3), 142-154.

49.

Park, Jong-Chul, Lee, Sang-Yeob, & Lee, Chul-Han(2011). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Corporate Image. The korean journal of advertising, 22(4), 179-201.

50.

Park, Jung-Ha, & Nam, Ki-Seob(2013). A Study on the Relation Between Corpoate Responsibility Activity of the Hotel, Corporate Image and Behavioral Intention, Journal of tourism management research, 55, 77-97.

51.

Ross, J. K., Patterson, L. T., & Stutts, M. A.(1992). Consumer Perceptions of Organizations That Use Cause-Related Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 93-98.

52.

Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B.(2001). Does Doing good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243.

53.

Surroca, J., Tribo, J. A., & Waddock, A.(2010). Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources, Strategic. Management Journal, 31, 463-490.

54.

Van, Riel, Allard, C. R., Pahud de Mortanges, C., & Streukens, S.(2005). Marketing Antecedents of Industrial Brand Equity: An Empirical Investigation in Specialty Chemicals. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(8), 841-847.

55.

Werther, J. W., & Chandler, D.(2005). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility as Global Brand Insurance. Business Horizons, 48, 317-324.

56.

Windsor, D.(2001). The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(3), 225-256.

57.

Yeo, Woon-Seung, & Oh, Myoung-Yul(2004). A Study on the Relationship Between Brand Equity and Its Components. Korea Marketing Review, 19(4), 155-184.

58.

Yoon, Kak, & Seo, Sang-Hee(2003). The Influence of Corporate Advertising and Social Responsibility Activities on Corporate Image and Brand Attitudes, Advertising Reserch, 61, 47-72.

59.

Yoon, Lyang-Sook(2008). The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Product-harm Crisis and the Brand Attitude, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Seoul National university.

The Journal of Distribution Science