바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Consumer Perceived Risk in the Korean Mobile Phone Market

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.9, pp.73-82
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.9.201409.73
Chung, Lak-Chae
Cho, Young-Sang
Kim, Hak-Ryul
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to illustrate the relationship between demographic factors and perceived risk types, supposing that Korean customers tend to postpone buying or hesitate to purchase the new version of hand sets, because of an early buying risk. Research design, data, and methodology - In addition to existing perceived risk types, the authors introduced an early buying risk. In order to measure each variable, also, the study has employed a five-point Liker-scale. To increase research reliability and validity, the research adopted an exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis, and one-way ANOVA. Results - First, there were statistically significant differences between financial risk and the group. Second, there weren't any statistically significant differences between the group means among the four perceived risk types (Performance Risk, Social Risk, Psychological Risk, and Physical Risk) and 4 factors (Gender, Age, Job, and Education). Lastly, job is apparently differentiated from others (Gender, Age, and Education). Conclusions - The authors found that customers regarded an early buying risk as one of the important perceived risk types, when purchasing a hand set.

keywords
Customer Behavior, Perceived Risk, Early Buying Risk, Mobile Phone, Smart Phone

Reference

1.

Arslan, Y., Gecti, F., and Zengin, H. (2013). Examining Perceived Risk and Its Influence on Attitudes: A Study on Private Label Consumers in Turkey. Asian Social Science, 9 (4), pp.158-166.

2.

Asembri, C. A. (1986). The effect of consumers’ planned products holding time on risk perception and acceptability. unpublished PhD thesis, City University of New York, New York, NY.

3.

Asia Economy Daily (2013). What the matter with Galaxy S4? Decreasing sales during the third quarter. Why? Asia Economy Daily, 27 September, Available from:http://www.asiae.co.kr

4.

Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking. inDynamic Marketing for a Changing World, ed. Robert S. Hancock, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 389-398.

5.

Beneke, J., Greene, A., Lok, I., and Mallett, K. (2012). The influence of perceived risk on purchase intent: the case of premium grocery private label brands in South Africa. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 21 (1), 4-14.

6.

Bergadaa, M., Coraux, G., and Gueroui, F. (2005). The purchasing risk: how is it managed by the consumers? The 32nd International Research Seminar in Marketing La Londe Seminar June, 7-10.

7.

Bettman, J. R. (1973). Perceived Risk and Its Components: A Model and Empirical Test. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(2), 184-190.

8.

Bettman, J. R. (1974). ."Relationship of information-processing attitude structures to private brand purchasing behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (1), 79-83.

9.

Bettman, J. R. (1975).Information Integration in Consumer Risk Perception: A Comparison of Two Modes of Component Conceptualisation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (3), 381-385.

10.

Brooker, G. (1984). An assessment of an expanded measure of perceived risk. in Advances in Consumer Research, 11, eds. Thomas C. Kinnear, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, 439-441.

11.

Bruwer, J., Fong, M., and Saliba, A. (2013). Perceived risk, risk-reduction strategies (RRS) and consumption occasions;Roles in the wine consumer’s purchase decision. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25 (3), 369-390.

12.

Cox, D. F., and Rich, S. V. (1964). Perceived risk and consumer decision-making: The case of telephone shopping. Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (4), 32-39.

13.

Chung L. C., and Cho Y. S. (2013). Do Quality-Focused Retailer Brand Types contribute to Building Store Loyalty. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(9), 5-15.

14.

Cunningham, S. (1967). The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk. In Cox, D. (ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior. Boston: Harvard Business School, 82-108.

15.

Derbaix, C. (1983). Perceived risk and risk believers: an empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3, 19-38.

16.

Dick, A., Jain, A., and Richardson, P. (1995).Correlates of store brand proneness: some empirical observations. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 4 (4), 15-22.

17.

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., and Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluation. Journalof Marketing Research, 28 (3), 307-319.

18.

Dowling, G. R. (1999). Perceived Risk. in Earl, P.E. and Kemp, S. (Eds), The Elgar Companion to Consumer Rand Economic Psychology, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.419-424.

19.

Grewal, D., Gotlieb, J., and Marmorstein, H. (1994). The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-Perceived Risk Relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), 145-153.

20.

Hammitt, J. K. (1990). Risk perceptions and food choice: An exploratory analysis of organic- versus conventional-produce buyers. Risk Analysis, 10 (3), 367-374.

21.

Hankookilbo (2012). As you buy a smart-phone, you will see a new model. The principle that a new smart-phone model would be launched per year will be broken soon. Hankookilbo, 14 December, Available from:http://news.hankooki.com

22.

Ho, S. S. M., and Victor, T. F. (1994). Customers’ risk perceptions of electronic payment systems. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 12 (8), 26-38.

23.

Jacoby, J., and Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk, In M. Venkatesan (Ed.), Proceedings, Third Annual Conference, The Association for Consumer Research, 2, 382-393.

24.

Jasper, C. R., and Quellette, S. J. (1994). Customers’ perception of risk and the purchase of apparel from catalogs. Journal of Direct Marketing, 8 (2), 23-36.

25.

Johnson, D. L., and Andrews, I. R. (1971). Risky-shift phenomenon as tested with consumer products as stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20 (3), 328-385.

26.

Kaplan, L. B., Jacoby, J., and Szybillo, G. J. (1974). Components of Perceived Risk in Product Purchase: A Cross-Validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (3), 287-291.

27.

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.

28.

Laurent, G., and Kapferer, J. -N. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(1), 41-53.

29.

Locander, W. B. and Hermann, P. W. (1979). The effect of self-confidence and anxiety on information seeking consumer risk-reduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(2), 268-274.

30.

Mieres, C. G., Martin, A. M. D., and Gutierrez, J. A. T. (2006). Influence of perceived risk on store brand proneness. International Journal of Retail and distribution Management, 34 (10), 761-772.

31.

Mitchell, V. W., and Greatorex, M. (1988). Consumer Risk Perception in the UK Wine Market. European Journal of Marketing, 22 (9), 5 - 15

32.

Mitchell, V. W., and Greatorex, M. (1993). Risk perception and reduction in the purchase of consumer services. The Service Industries Journal, 13 (4), 179-200.

33.

Murray, K. B., and Schlacter, J. L. (1990).The Impact of Services Versus Goods on Consumer’s Assessment of Perceived Risk and Variability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18 (1), 51-65.

34.

Oglethorpe, J. E. (1988). An examination of the Determinants of Perceived Risk and Acceptability of Hazardous Products and Activities. unpublished dissertation, College of Business Administration, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.

35.

Olsen, J. E., Thompson, K. J., and Clarke, T. K. (2003). Consumer self-confidence in wine purchase. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 15 (3), 40-51.

36.

Richardson, P. S., Jain, A. K., and Dick, A. (1996). Household store brand proneness: A framework. Journal of Retailing, 72 (2), 159-185.

37.

Roselius, E. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35 (1), 56-61.

38.

Schiffman, L. G., O’Cass, A., Paladino, A., D’alessandro, S., and Bednall, D. (2011). Consumer Behaviour (5th ed.). Sydney, Australia: Frenchs Forest.

39.

Shapiro, B. P. (1968). The Psychology of Pricing. Harvard Business Review, 46 (July-August), 14-25.

40.

Shimp, T. A., and Bearden, W.O. (1982).Warranty and Other Extrinsic Cue Effects on Consumers’ Risk Perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (1), 38-46.

41.

Spence, H. E., Engel, J.F., and Blackwell, R.D. (1970). Perceived Risk in Mail-Order and Retail Store Buying. Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (3), 364-369.

42.

Stone, R. N., and Gronhaug, K. (1993). Perceived Risk: Further considerations for the Marketing Discipline. European Journal of Marketing, 27 (3), 39-50.

43.

Taylor, J. W. (1974).The Role of Risk in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 38 (2), 54-60.

44.

Tull, D. S., Boring, R. A., and Gonsior, M. H. (1964). A Note on the Relationship of price and Imputed quality. Journal of Business, 37 (2), 186-191.

45.

White, J. D., and Truly, E. L. (1989). Price-quality Integration in Warranty Premium. Journal of Business Research, 19, 109-125.

46.

Williams, P. R. D., and Hammitt, J. K. (2001). Perceived risks of Conventional and Organic Produce: Pesticides, Pathogens, and Natural Toxins. Risk analysis, 21 (2), 319-330.

The Journal of Distribution Science