- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS
ISSN : 1738-3110
Comparative Study of the Effects of the Intermodal Freight Transport Policies
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - The Korean government has devised intermodal transportation policies and granted subsidies to shippers and logistics companies that made a conversion of transportation means through the policies. This provides support by expanding the complex uniform railroad transportation and overhauling the deteriorated railroad facilities. As for 2013, however, the freight transportation percentage of railroad was 4.5% in tons and 8.5% in ton kilometers. Meanwhile, since the 1990s, developed countries such as the U.S. and Europe have been trying to expand intermodal freight transport with a legal and institutional support to build a logistics system corresponding with social and economic environmental changes. In this study, I set out to examine the effects of the intermodal freight transport policies in the EU and the U.S., and to explore the direction of setting up a rail intermodal transport system in South Korea. Research design, data, and methodology - The paper used a qualitative research methodology through the literature review. First, was an overview of Intermodal transportation in the EU, U.S. and UN. Second, it describes the development of transport in Europe and the U.S. with particular emphasis on intermodal freight transport. Third, it explores the direction of setting up a intermodal freight transport in South Korea. The last section contains concluding remarks. Results - As for the EU, it has been promoting integration between transport and intermodal logistics network designs while utilizing ITS or ICT and supports for rail freight intermodal by giving reduction to a facilities fee or subsidizing for rail freight in order to minimize the cost of external due to freight transport. On the other hand, as for the U.S., it has been made up of an industrial-led operating project and has been promoting it to improve accessibility between intermodal hubs and cargo terminals through intermodal corridor program, and an intermodal cargo hub access corridor projects, etc. Moreover, it has tried to construct intermodal transport system using ITS or ICT and to remove Barrier. As a result, in these countries, the proportion of intermodal freight transport is going to be the second significant transport compared with rail and maritime transport. An Effective rail intermodal transport system is needed in South Korea, as seen in the case of these countries. In order to achieve this object, the following points are required to establish radical infrastructure policy; diversify investment financing measures taken under public-private partnerships, legal responsibilities, improvement of utilization of existing facilities to connect the railway terminal and truck terminal, and enhancement service competitiveness through providing cargo tracking and security information that combines the ITS and ICT. Conclusions - This study will be used as a basis for policy and support for intermodal freight transport in South Korea. In the future, it is also necessary to examine from the perspective of the shipper companies using the rail intermodal transport, ie, recognition of shipper, needed institutional supports, and transportation demand forecasting and cost-effective analysis of the railway infrastructure systems improvement.
- keywords
- Intermodal Freight Transport, <tex> $CO_2$</tex> Emissions, Global Supply Chain Management, Sustainable Transport System, Information Communications Technology
Reference
Aiman, Y., & Amina, U. (2015). Energy Efficiency and Co2Emissions of the Transportation System of Kazakhstan:A Case of Almaty. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 2(3), 41-46.
Association of American Railroads (2012). Railroad Facts 2011. Washington, D.C., USA: Publications of the Association of American Railroads.
Bakhyt, K. Y. (2015). Problem of Decarbonization of the Economy of Kazakhstan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 2(3), 37-39.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2015). National Transportation Statistics. Washington. D.C., USA: Publications of the U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration.
Burkhard, E. H. (2005). Development potential of intermodal logistics of Japan through on the international comparison. Institute for Transport Policy Studies, 7(4), 58-60.
Burkhard, E. H., & N. T. (2005). Intermodal Logistics Policies in the EU, the U.S. and Japan. Institute for Transport Policy Studies, 7(4), 2-14.
Choi, B. N., Lee, H. H., & Yang, H. C. (2014). Impacts of Value Inclination and Self-Expressive Consuming Propensity upon Eco-Friendly Product Purchasing Intention. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(4), 39-49.
Choi, I. S., & Lee, A. Y. (2012). A Study on the Regulatory Environment of the French Distribution Industry and the Intermarche’s Management strategies. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 3(1), 7-16.
ECMT (2004). Efficient Integration of Rail Freight Transport. Paris, France: Publications of the European Conference of Ministers of Transport.
ECMT (1997). Glossary for Transport Statistics: Intermodal Transport. Sec. Ed, Paris, France: Publications of the European Conference of Ministers of Transport.
ECMT (1998). Terminology on Combined Transport. Paris. France: Publications of the European Conference of Ministers of Transport.
European Commission (2014), EU Transport in figures: Statistical pocketbook 2014. Brussels, Belgium: Publications of the European Union.
European Commission (2005b). Analysis of the EU Combined Transport, final report. Frankfurt Am Main, Germany:Publications of the European Union.
European Commission (2015c). EU Transport in figures: Statistical pocketbook 2015. Brussels, Belgium: Publications of the European Union.
European Commission (2015a). TEN-T priority axes and projects. Brussels, Belgium: Publications of the European Union.
European Court of Auditors (2013), Have the Marco Polo programmes been effective in shifting traffic off the road?. Luxemburg: Publications of the European Union.
Jones, W. B., Cassady, C. R., & Bowden, R. O. Jr. (2000). Developing a standard definition of international transportation. Transportation Law Journal, 27(3), 345-352.
Junko, S., & Kuse, H. (2009). Effects by Deregulation and Intermodal Transport Policy on the U.S. Intermodal Traffic Volume after 1980. Journal of Japan Logistics Society, 17, 204-207.
Lee, J. W., (2014). The Impact of Product Distribution and Information Technology on Carbon Emission and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence in Korea. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 1(3), 17-28.
Muhammad, I. I., Nazia, H., Waseem, K., & Muhammad, W. (2012), A Review on Triple-A Supply Chain Performance. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 2(2), 35-39.
Nakamura, T. (2013). Development of the Discussion on the Intermodal Freight Transport Policy in European Union. Osaka Sangyo University journal of business administration, 14(2), 141-156.
Reggiani, A., Cattaneo, S., Janic, M., & Nijkamp, P. (2000). Freight Transport in Europe: Policy Issue and Future Scenarios on Trans-Border Alpine Connections. IATSS Research, 24(1), 48-59.
Stephen, M., Gabriel, M., & Jephisa, M. (2013). The Impact of globalization on business and economic development in Zimbabwe. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(2), 31-37.
Surface Transportation Board (2010). Description of the U.S. Freight Railroad Industry (November 2009). Washington, D.C., USA: Publications of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
UNECE (2001). Terminology on Combined Transport. New York and Geneva, U.S.A: Publications of the United Nations & Economic Commission for Europe.
Woo, J. W., Han, N. H., & Park, M. S. (2013). A Review of the Establishment of a Rail Intermodal Logistics System to Reinforce the Foundation for Green Trade - with a focus on an American case -. Korea International Commerce Review, 28(2), 99-112.
Xiaopeng, L., (2012). Study on Logistics Industry Cooperation between Shandong and South Korea. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 3(2), 23-27.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations