바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Comparative Assessment of Corporate Philanthropy by the IPA Method: Service and Manufacturing Industries

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.4, pp.89-98
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.4.201504.89
Ko, Jeong-Yong
Park, Hyeon-Suk
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - In today's globalized and modern business environment, corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities are considered to be essential for the sustainable development of enterprises. In addition, the corporate philanthropy that is related to CSR practices, as well as their being capable of reducing the anti-corporate sentiment of people have facilitated a qualitative forward leap into the quantitative growth phase. This study aims to undertake a comparative evaluation of corporate philanthropy through the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method focusing on service and manufacturing industries, and to eventually determine a differentiated approach that is needed for corporate philanthropy. Research design, data, and methodology - The survey responses were collected through online research on specialized companies from consumers nationwide who were aged from 20 to 60 and who are aware of corporate philanthropy. A total of 408 sheets of questionnaire survey were used. Frequency analysis was undertaken in this study. The interviewees had demographic characteristics of gender: 206 males (50.5%) and 202 females (49.5%). They also had demographic characteristics of age: 82 people were over 20 (20.1%), 96 over 30 (23.5%), 105 over 40 (25.7%), and 125 over 50 (30.7%) years of age. The distribution of interviewees' residences is as follows: 154 persons (37.7%) in the Special City, 102 persons (25.0%) in the Metropolitan City, and 152 persons (37.3%) in the Provincial Region. The interviewees have been working for the following companies: 34 persons (8.3%) in LG Display, 80 (19.6%) in KT&G, 49 (12.0%) in Amore Pacific, 42 (10.3%) in KIA Motors, 47 (11.5%) in SBS, 52 (12.8%) in Shinhan Bank, 86 (21.1%) in Asiana Airlines, and 18 (4.4%) in Hyundai Department Store. We applied the paired t-test for the IPA analysis. PASW Statistics 18 was used for statistical analysis. Results - The results of IPA analysis indicated that the importance and performance degrees in both manufacturing and service industries were significantly different. Major empirical results showed that, in consumer, social, economic, philanthropic, and environmental dimensions, in the sub-factors of philanthropy activities in both manufacturing and service industries, the importance degree was found to be higher than performance degree. Further, the average difference between importance degree and performance degree by the sub-factors of philanthropy activities. On the other hand, the average difference of environmental dimension was found to be highest in both service and manufacturing industries. Thus, while consumers consider the philanthropy activities of the environmental dimension as most important, actual companies treat performance of philanthropy activities of the environmental dimension insufficiently or negligibly to some degree. Conclusions - The differentiated approach method that is required for corporate philanthropy may be proposed to uplift corporate accomplishments by analyzing the IPA of the attributes of the sub-factors of corporate philanthropy. This is, to an extent, insufficient in the existing studies related to the use of the IPA technique, and it shows the items that are to be conducted intensively.

keywords
Corporate Philanthropy, IPA, Service Industries, Environment

Reference

1.

Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. (2000). Business & society:Ethics and stakeholder management. Ohio: South-Western College Publishing.

2.

Cho, Hee-Jae, Lee, Kab-Soo, Shin, Hye-Jung, Choi, Myeong-Koo, Jeong, Tae-Jin, & Shin, Mee-Joo (2011). The Essence of Corporate Social Contribution: SPIRIT. Samsung Economic Research Institute 『CEO Information』, 809, 1-20.

3.

Cho, Jung-Keun (2008). A Study on the Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Financial Performance, Doctoral dissertation. Gyeonggi, Korea: The Graduate School of Kyungwon University.

4.

Cho, Yoon-Sung (2009). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) on the Quality of Customer Relationship, Doctoral dissertation. Seoul, Korea: The Graduate School of Hanyang University.

5.

Choi, Sook-Hee (2008). Corporate Social Contribution Activities. Korea Listed Companies Association research, 57, 46-66.

6.

Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined:an Analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.

7.

Kania, J. V., & Oakley, M. W. (2003). Design for giving:Understanding what motivates corporate philanthropy. FSG Perspectives on Corporate Philanthropy(Winter), Foundation Strategy Group, LLC.

8.

Kim, Bong-Chul (2006). A Priority Analysis on Corporate Social Contribution Programs Through Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP). Advertising Research, 71, 131-151.

9.

Kim, Gang-Hyeon (2014). Direction and Tasks of Social Contribution Activities in Cooperative Banks. NongHyup Economic Research Institute, 1-45.

10.

Kim, Hae-Ryong, Kim, Na-Min, Yoo, Kwang-Hee, & Lee, Moon-Kyu (2005). Developing a Scale for Evaluating Corporate Social Responsibility. Korea Marketing Review, 20(2), 67-87.

11.

Kim, Jong-Ho, Hwang, Hee-Joong, & Song, In-Am (2014). Affecting Customer Loyalty by Improving Corporate Image and Customer Value through Corporate Social Responsibility Activities. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(8), 31-42.

12.

Kim, Jong-Jin, Eom, Tae-Kyung, Kim, Sun-Woong, & Youn, Myoung-Kil (2015). Effects of Ethical Management on Job Satisfaction and Turnover in the South Korean Service Industry. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 6(1), 17-26.

13.

Kim, Sung-Ho, & Hong, Jeong-Hwa (2012). A Study on the Effect of Corporate Social Contribution on Corporate BSC Performance. Study on Accounting, Taxation &Auditing, 54(1), 211-253.

14.

Ko, Jeong-Yong, & Park, Hyeon-Suk (2014). Corporate Philanthropy and Its Effects on Corporate Reputation and Customer Loyalty in Korea. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 10(4), 871-895.

15.

Korea Chamber of Commerce & Industry (2013). The second half of 2013, Corporate Favorite Index Research Press Releases. Retrieved Nonember 21, 2014, from http://www.korcham.net.

16.

Kotler, P. (2006). Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.

17.

Lee, Don-Gon, & Lee, Myung-Jin (2014). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Image and Corporate Performance. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(9), 101-112.

18.

Lee, Jeoung-Hak, & Kim, Wook-Ki (2011). An Importance-Satisfaction Analysis on Corporate Social Responsibility of Pro-Baseball Team thorough an IPA Method. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 22(2), 1986-1998.

19.

Lee, Sung-Hee, Kim, Young-Jin, Jung, Goo-Sang, Lee, Hyun-Soo, Kim, Sun-Ah, & Kim, Tae-Sung (2013). The Effects of Brand Loyalty on Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR)Activities. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(2), 79-89.

20.

Lee, Young-Jae, Park, Soo-Hong, & Sun, Il-Suck (2015). A Study on IPA-based Competitiveness Enhancement Measures for Regular Freight Service. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(1), 83-91.

21.

Lim, Tae-Sung, Lee, Ho-Youl, Park, Jae-Woo, Kim, Ju-Yong, & Park, Hyun-Wook (2012). A Plan for the Sustainable Development of Sports ToTo Using IPA Analysis. Journal of Korean Society of Sport Policy, 10(3), 17-32.

22.

MacPhail, F., & Bowles, P. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility as Support for Employee Volunteers:Impacts, Gender Puzzles and Policy Implications in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 405-416.

23.

Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of marketing, 41(1), 77-79.

24.

McAlister, D. T., & Ferrell, L. (2002). The role of strategic philanthropy in marketing strategy. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 689-705.

25.

Moon, Chul-Soo (2004). The Study on Strategic Philanthropies of Corporations PR Campaign. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 15(5), 343-360.

26.

Moon, Kae-Sung (2013). The Relationships between Social Contribution Activities, Enterprise Image, Reputation, and Relationship Quality for Sports Public Enterprise. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 24(1), 72-85.

27.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.

28.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy, Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-68.

29.

Raiborn, C., Green, A., Todorova, L., Trapani, T., & Watson, W. E. (2003). Corporate Philanthropy: When is giving effective?. The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 15(1), 47-54.

30.

Ryoo, Dong-Kyun (2009). The impact on the image of a company by its social contribution, Master's thesis. Seoul, Korea:The Graduate School of Sungkyunkwan University.

31.

Simon, F. L. (1995). Global corporate philanthropy: a strategic framework. International Marketing Review, 12(4), 20-37.

32.

Su, Shua, Jeong, Young-Jun, Choi, Jin-Young, & Kim, Sun-Woong (2015). Effects of Ethical Management of Retail Enterprises in Korea on Corporate Image and Purchase Intention. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(1), 27-35.

33.

The Federation of Korean Industries (2013). Corporate Community Relations White Book 2013. Seoul, Korea:FKI Media Ltd.

34.

Wulfson, M. (2001). The Ethics of Corporate Social Responsibility and Philanthropic Venturesl. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(1/2), 135-145.

The Journal of Distribution Science