바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Effects of Executive Compassion and Forgiving Behavior on Organizational Activities and Performance

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.6, pp.105-118
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.6.201506.105
Park, Soo-Yong
Hawang, Moon-Young
Chol, Eun-Soo
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Currently, strengthening small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) in terms of competitiveness is a key economic issue. However, the problem is that many SMEs lack the internal competence required to cope with a rapidly changing market structure. Such problems can act as an obstacle to economic development, yet most SMEs in Korea are dealing with this problem today. A company's source of competitive advantage is changing from quantity to quality, facility to knowledge, and hardwork to creativity. Under such circumstances, a company should place learning and sharing of knowledge and continuously creating new knowledge as its priority. This study aims to identify the effect of a chief executive officer's (CEO) compassion and forgiveness - positive factors in organizational emotion - on learning organization activities and organizational performance, through a theoretical comparison. Research design, data, and methodology - For this study, SMEs based in Daejeon and Chungcheong area were selected. To secure credibility of the data, the subjects were selected among those who have been working at the business for six months or longer. The survey was conducted for 30 days from March 5, 2015 to April 5, 2015. Both offline and online surveys were conducted. Fifty companies were chosen and 700 questionnaires were distributed, with 506 used for analysis. Fifty subject companies (25 from Daejeon, 10 from Chungnam, 10 from Chungbuk, and five from Sejong) were selected and the objective, target, and survey content were explained to a manager at each company either face-to-face or on the phone. Of the total of 700 questionnaires distributed via mail or e-mail, 78.6% or 550 copies were returned. Excluding 44 insufficient questionnaires, the remainder, 506 questionnaires, were used for analysis. Results - This study analyzed how the CEO's compassion and forgiveness affects learning organization activities and organizational performance. First, compassion of the CEO at the SMEs directly affected the learning organization activities and indirectly affected the organizational performance. Second, forgiveness of the CEO at the SMEs did not affect the learning organization activities and organizational performance directly or indirectly. Conclusions - The study conclusions are as follows. First, CEO compassionate behavior at the SMEs was a significant variable that directly and indirectly affected learning organization activities and organizational performance. Therefore, the CEO of an SME can create a positive organizational atmosphere through compassionate behaviors in the organization. Second, the forgiving behavior of the CEO did not have direct or indirect effects on learning organization activities and organizational performance. However, the reason for a CEO to continue his or her forgiving behavior is because it strengthens employee resilience, commitment, and self-efficacy to protect the organization from negative influences such as layoffs, risks, and wrongdoings. The action of forgiveness does not have direct or indirect effects. However, the CEO shall continue such behavior to strengthen members' physiological resilience, commitment, and self - effectiveness, and to protect the organization from risks including layoff and external negative factors.

keywords
Learning Organization Activity, Organizational Performance, Compassion, forgiveness, Positive Organization

Reference

1.

Al‐Mabuk, R. H., Enright, R. D., & Cardis, P. A. (1995). Forgiveness education with parentally love‐deprived late adolescents. Journal of Moral Education, 24(4), 427-444.

2.

Bagozzi, R. (2003). Positive and negative emotions in organizations. Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, 12, 176-193.

3.

Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644-675.

4.

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop:Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of public administration research and theory, 10(4), 685-712.

5.

Cameron, K. (2012). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

6.

Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

7.

Cho, Tae-Joon & Sin, Min-Cheol (2011). The Effects of Empowerment on Perception-Based Organizational Performance: A Focus on the Mediating Effects of Individual and Organizational Characteristics. Administration of Collection of Writings, 49(1), 31-61.

8.

Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of management journal, 49(3), 544-560.

9.

Coyle, C. T., &Enright, R. D. (1997). Forgiveness intervention with postabortion men. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 65(6), 1042.

10.

Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., Worline, M. C., Lilius, J. M., & Kanov, J. M. (2002). Leading in times of trauma. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 54-61.

11.

Dutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. Positive organizational scholarship:Foundations of a new discipline, 3, 263-278.

12.

Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of general psychology, 2(3), 300-319.

13.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.

14.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2002). Positive emotions: Handbook of positive psychology. London: Oxford University Press.

15.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). The value of positive emotions: The emerging science of positive psychology is coming to understand why it’s good to feel good. American scientist, 91(4), 330-335.

16.

Freedman, S. R., & Enright, R. D. (1996). Forgiveness as an intervention goal with incest survivors. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 64(5), 983–992.

17.

Garratt, B. (1987). The Learning Organization: and the need for directors who think. London: Fontana Paperbacks.

18.

Garvin, D. (1993). Building a learning enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78-91.

19.

Jeon, Sun-Yeong, & Lee, Ho-Sun (2010). on the Relationship between Organizational Performance on the Relationship between Organizational Performance. Korea Personnel Management Association Conference Proceedings, 2010(2), 1-26.

20.

Jin, Gyu-Dong, & Choi, Eun-Soo (2008). Relationship of Activities of Learning Organization on Organizational Performance in the manufacturing and non-manufacturing industries. Journal Of Corporate Education, 10(1), 1-26.

21.

Kang, In-Ho, Kwon, Gyeong-Deuk, & Lee, Gye-Man (2005). A Study on Local Government’s Women Friendly Policy and Organization Performance. Korean Policy Sciences Review, 9(4), 343-360.

22.

Kanov, J. M., Maitlis, S., Worline, M. C., Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. M. (2004). Compassion in organizational life. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 808-827.

23.

Kaplan, B. H. (1992). Social health and the forgiving heart: The Type B story. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(1), 3-14.

24.

Kim, Dong-Heon, Kim Yeong-Jae, & Lee, Yeong-Chan (2010). The Effect of CoP Activity on Social Capital and Organizational Performance: Focusing on the example of Yuhan-Kimberly, POSCO, HIRA. Knowledge Management Research, 11(3), 77-90.

25.

Kim, Han-Jun, & Lee, Gi-Seong (2010). A Study on the SME's Organizational Performance by Learning Organization's Activities - in terms of the development of relationship model between learning organization and organizational performance. The Journal Of Lifelong Education And HRD, 6(3), 161-189.

26.

Kim, Ji-Woong, & Lim, Joon-Hyeong (2013). General thesis:Effect of CoP Activities of a Public Enterprise on Recognized Job Performance: Focusing on the Mediator Effect of Social Capital. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review, 12(3), 161-187.

27.

Kim, Jong-Il (2006). Structural Change of Korean Economy and Small and Medium Enterprises. New Bridge Study, 06-01, 172.

28.

Kim, Gye-Soo (2010). (Amos 18.0) Structural Equation Model Analysis. Seoul, Korea: Hannarae Academy.

29.

Kim, Soo-dong (2011). The Study for Leadership of Caring in Oriental Classics - centering on The Analects of Confucius(論語). The Journal of Korean Educational Forum, 10(2), 47-67.

30.

Kim, Soo-dong, Ahn, Jae-jin, & Lee, Jung-yun (2014). A Study on the Development of Caring Scale Items. Journal Of Social Science, 25(1), 81-104.

31.

Koo, Bon-Hyeong (2005). Coreanity Management: Humanist. Seoul, Korea: Sangkak.

32.

Koo, Jeong-Mo & Song, Hae-Deok (2011). Relationship between CoP Participation and Immersion with Knowledge Sharing Intention as the Parameter. [A Study on the Relationship between CoP Participation Willingness and Commitment: Mediating Effects of Knowledge Sharing Intention]. Korea HRD Research, 6(1), 75-95.

33.

Lee, Dong-soo (2006). Coexistence and Care: the Comparison of the Relationship with Others in East and West. The Korean Review of Political Thought, 12(1), 57-80.

34.

Lim, Cheol-Heon, & Choi, Eun Soo (2010). The Effect of CEO's Leadership and Learning Organization in Enterprises on the Outcome Management of Human Resource Development System. Life-long·HRD Research, 6(2), 99-119.

35.

Marquardt, M. J. (1996). Building the learning organization. NY:McGraw-Hill Companies.

36.

Masten, A., Reed, M., Snyder, C., & Lopez, S. (2002). Handbook of positive psychology. Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.

37.

Moon, Soo-Baek (2009). Understanding and Application of Structural Equation Modeling. Seoul, Korea: Hakjisa.

38.

Newcomer, K. E. (2001). Tracking and probing program performance:fruitful path or blind alley for evaluation professionals. The American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 337-341.

39.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company:How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford university press.

40.

Oh, Eul-Im, Kim, Gu, & Bae, Yong-Tae (2002). The Effects of Organizational Learning on Organizational Change and Performance in Local Public Agency. Korean Society And Public Administration, 13(3), 207-237.

41.

Park, Hyeon-Gil (2010). Leading by Example. Warmth and Consideration, and Leadership of Reformation, 44, 61-68.

42.

Pedlar, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. (1991). The learning company. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

43.

Seligman, M. E. (2004). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Simon and Schuster.

44.

Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and science of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.

45.

Sin, Eun-Kyoung (2011). Study on the impacts of Accommodations and supports in Workplace - Focused on the Employees with Disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 20(3), 55-80.

46.

Sin, Hwang-Yong, & Lee, Hee-Seon (2015). Structural Relations among Transformational Leadership, Leader Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior : Focused on the Fisheries Cooperatives. Korean Public Management Review, 29(1), 1-28.

47.

Stuart, R., & Abetti, P. A. (1987). Start-up ventures: Towards the prediction of initial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 215-230.

48.

Sung, Yun-Ok (2014). The Effect of Employees' Social Regard on Service Loyalty: Comparative Approach of Beauty Services and Fast-food Services in Service Settings. Journal Of The Korea Contents Association, 14(1), 409-422.

49.

Sutcliffe, K., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In Cameron, K., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94-110). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

50.

Thoresen, C. E., Harris, A. H., & Luskin, F. (2000). Forgiveness and health: An unanswered question. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 163-190), Radnor, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.

51.

Tobin, D. R. (1998). Networking your knowledge. Management Review, 87(4), 46.

52.

Wang, Kyung Su, & Kim, Hyeon Young (2010). Structural Relationships among Individualized Consideration, Intrinsic Motivation, Challenging Work, Resources, Creativity and Job Performance. The Journal of Thinking Development, 6(2), 51-71.

53.

Williams, P. L. (1989). Everything You Always Wanted to Know about the Catholic Church but Were Afraid to Ask for Fear of Excommunication. New York: Doubleday.

54.

Yoon, Jong-Rok, Lim, A. Ruem, & Son, Sung-Gon (2011). An Exploratory study on the Effects of Small and Medium business Learning organization on Performance. Korean review of management consulting, 2(2), 1-26.

The Journal of Distribution Science