바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1738-3110

Article Contents

Next
Early Access e-Submission

Vol.13 No.8
Citation Share

Evaluation of Competitiveness in Auto Distribution Industry between Korea and Russia

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.8, pp.5-14
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.8.201508.5
Lee, Jae-Sung
Lee,, J. (2015). Evaluation of Competitiveness in Auto Distribution Industry between Korea and Russia. The Journal of Distribution Science, 13(8), 5-14, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.8.201508.5
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Purpose - This study undertakes to examine the automotive trade structure between Korea and Russia to accelerate economic cooperation and pinpoint trade discrepancies to increase trade volume through improved policies, eventually finding ways for trade expansion. Research design, data, and methodology - To analyze trade decision factors for both countries, the Index of trade specialization invented by trade specialization theory, is used. Although specific factors should materialize in the trade decision analysis, realistically, concrete explanations are difficult as many unsolved factors are involved as well as their complexities Results - First, to assess comparative market competitiveness, the Index describes A value/B value, representing the Korean versus the Russia market share and the Korean market share versus the world. Second, the index shows that Korea is taking comparative advantage of its export specialization. Third, the RCA indices show considerable improvement compared to 2000. Conclusions - This research used a quantitative approach to examine trade specialization and examined a comparative advantage index of market share to see how inter-trade relations have changed over the past 10 years.

keywords
Trade Specialization, Revealed Comparative Advantage, Market Share

Reference

1.

Asgari, Omid (2015). Examination of the Impact of Blood Groups on Group Participation. The International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 6(2), 25-30.

2.

Baygi, S. J. H., & Javadi, P. (2015). Disclosure Quality and Economic Value Added. The International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 6(2), 5-11.

3.

Chulanova, Zaure K., & Ussenova, Anel S. (2015). Human Capital and Methodic of Determination of Its Cost: A Case of Kazakhstan. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 2(2), 19-25.

4.

Customs Office(2014). 2014 Annual Export & Import Statistics Reports. June 17, 2015, Retrieved from http://www.customs.go.kr/kcsweb/user.tdf?a=user.statsIndex .StatsIndexApp&bid=PA012DM&npp=4&len=18

5.

Fry, James D. (2006). The Evolution of Host Specialization: Are Trade-Offs Overrated? The American Naturalist, 1(48), 84-107.

6.

Hanssens, Dominique M. (2010). Market Response, Competitive Behavior and Time Series Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(Nov), 470-85.

7.

Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. (2011). The network structure of economic output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16, 309-342.

8.

Krugman, Paul R. (2001). Intraindustry Specialization and Gains from Trade. The Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 959-973.

9.

Kumari, Neeraj (2015). The Effectiveness of the Training Program at HCL. The East Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(3), 23-28.

10.

Laursen, Keld (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Business Review, 5, 99-115.

11.

Mehyaoul, Quafaa (2015). Country Analysis: Algeria. The East Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(3), 29-31.

12.

Mizuno, Junko (2010). A study on Korea against Japan trade deficit. Asia Economy Review, 5, 45-59

13.

Rao, Ram C., & Bass, Frank M. (2005). Competition, Strategy, and Price Dynamics: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(Aug), 283-96.

14.

Rotemberg, Julio J., & Saloner, Garth (2010). Competition and human capital accumulation: a theory of interregional specialization and trade. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30, 373-404.

15.

Shadkam, Elham, & Bijari, Mehdi (2015). The Optimization of Bank Branches Efficiency by Means of Response Surface Method and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case of Iran. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 2(2), 13-18.

16.

Sims, Christopher A. (2012). Money, Income, and Causality. American Economic Review, 62, 540-52.

17.

Uncomtrade (2012). 2012 Annual Statistics Reports, NewYork, USA. Retrieved May 21, 2015, from http://comtrade.un.org/db/dqQuickQuery.aspx

18.

Venkatesh, Bharti, & Sharma, Amit Kumar (2015). Interactive Motivational Concept: A Study of Motivation among Corporate of Bhopal Region in India. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 2(2), 35-38.

19.

Vollrath, Thomas L. (2011). A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Review of World Economics, 127(2), 265-280.

20.

WTO (2012). 2012 Annual Statistics Reports, NewYork, USA. May 21, 2015, Retrieved from http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2013_e/its13

21.

Uchida, Yoko (2008). Vertical Specialization in East Asia: Some Evidence from East Asia Using Asian International Input-Output Tables from 1975 to 2000. Journal of Developing Economies, 7, 3-28.

The Journal of Distribution Science

Early Access e-Submission OA Policy