바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Effects of Child Welfare Service Quality Delivery and Customer Satisfaction from the Service Distribution Perspective

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.8, pp.91-96
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.8.201508.91
Um, Keung-Ho
Kim, Jin-Woo
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This study reviews the delivery of child welfare service quality and examines how the dimensions of the variables of customer satisfaction impact the results from a service distribution perspective. This study differs from existing research since it proposes that a recognized level of child welfare service quality is necessary to achieve customer satisfaction from the perspective of service distribution. Research design, data, and methodology - This study explores child welfare service quality factors that affect customer satisfaction. The study examines and analyzes demographic variables, service quality dimensions, and the causal relationships between child welfare service quality and customer satisfaction. Data from 300 child welfare cases were collected from organizations in Korea in the areas of Busan and Gyeongsangnamdo. The methods of analysis are as follow. First, using descriptive analysis frequency, the percentages were evaluated to assess the demographic variables. Second, Cronbach's &#x03B1; was used to test reliability and to evaluate the internal consistency of the measuring of items. Third, multiple regression analysis was conducted to find out how much the independent variable can affect customer satisfaction. Results - Five factors of child welfare service quality were identified in three categories: process quality (assurance, empathy), results quality (reliability, caring), and physical environment quality (tangibles). There were significant differences among the effects of the child welfare service quality factors on customer satisfaction. A multiple regression analysis was done with process quality (assurance, empathy), results quality (reliability, caring) and physical environment quality (tangibles) to test the hypothesis: assurance (t=2.434, p<0.05), empathy (t=3.677, p<0.001), reliability (t=3.271, p<0.05), caring (t=4.380, p<0.000), and tangibles (t=3.654, p<0.01) had a positive influence on child welfare service quality from a service distribution perspective. Therefore, hypotheses 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were supported. In addition, multiple regression analysis on the effects of the variables showed that caring (&#x03B2;=0.273), empathy (&#x03B2;=0.246), tangibles (&#x03B2;=0.265), reliability (&#x03B2;=0.152), and assurance (&#x03B2;=0.131) all had a positive and strong influence on child welfare service quality from a service distribution perspective. Therefore, all child welfare service quality categories (process, results and physical environment quality) were positively statistically significant. Conclusion - In this study, the main findings can be summarized as follows. First, the quality of service of child welfare consists of three dimensions of quality: process quality, results quality, and physical environment quality. The results of the multiple regression analysis also showed that caring and reliability were confirmed as more meaningful variables by the increasing loading factors. Second, the family members involved in child welfare proposed caring as the most important variable among the dimensions of service quality. Third, the results of the hypothesis testing using regression showed that all child welfare service quality factors had a positive impact on customer satisfaction. The results of the study could provide useful information to help increase the effectiveness of delivery strategies for child welfare service quality from a service distribution perspective.

keywords
Child Welfare, Service Quality, Recognition, Customer Satisfaction

Reference

1.

An, Seong-Beom, Song, In-Am, & Hwang, Hee-Joong (2013). The Influence of the Car Master’ Recognized Core Capability level in Achieving Customer Satisfaction:Emphasis on Mediating Effect of Moment of Truth Quality. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(4), 37-49.

2.

Boulding, William, Kalra, Ajay, Staelin, Richard, & Zeithaml, Valarie A. (1993). A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(February), 7-27.

3.

Carman, J. M. (1990). Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality:An Assessment of the SERVQUAL Dimensions. Journal of Retailing, 66(1), 33-55.

4.

Churchill, Gilbert A. J., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(Nov), 491-504.

5.

Cronin, J. J. Jr., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring Service Quality : A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(July), 55-68.

6.

Cronin, J. J. Jr., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL : Reconciling Performance Based and Perception-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(Jan), 125-131.

7.

Fornell, Claes (1992). A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer:The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing, 56(January), 6-21.

8.

Friedlander, W. A., & Apte, R. Z. (1980). Introduction to Social Welfare. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

9.

Gates, B. (1980). Social Program Administration: The Implementation of Social Policy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

10.

Gilbert, Neil, & Terrell, P. (2002). Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy. Boston: Allynand Baco.

11.

Gronroos, C. (1984). A service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 35-44.

12.

Gronroos, C. (1988). Service Quality: The Six Criteria of Good Service Quality. Review of Business, 9(Winter), 10-3.

13.

Hart, C. W. L., Heskett, J. L., & Sasser, W. E. (1990). The Profitable Art of Service Recovery. Harvard Business Review, (July-August), 14-28.

14.

Holbrook, M. B., & Corfman, K. P. (1985). Quality and Value in the Consumption Experience. In Phaedrus Rides Again. I. J. Jacobyog J. C. Olson (Eds). Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, (pp.31-57), Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

15.

Hyun, Young-Yeul (2009). A Study on the Human Rights Recognition and the Job Satisfaction of Social Workers in Child and Adolescent Welfare Institutions. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in University of Seoul.

16.

Jang, In-Hyup (1992). Social Welfare. Seoul: Seoul University Press.

17.

Johnson, Michael D., & Fornell, Claes (1991). A Framework for Comparing Customer Satisfaction Across Individuals and Product Categories. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12(2), 267-286.

18.

Kelly, Janet M., & Swindell, David (2002). A Multiple-Indicator Approach to Municipal Service Evaluation: Correlating Performance Measurement and Citizen Satisfaction across Jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 610-621.

19.

Kim, In, & Shin, Hakgene (2009). Effects of Service Quality to Service Satisfaction and Decision Making in Elderly Care Facility. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 29(2), 579-591.

20.

Kim, Moon-Dong (2007). A Study on the Determinants of Service Quality in Welfare Institutions for the Handicapped -Focused on the Socialization of Institution. Seoul, Korea:Thesis for Doctorate in Hanyang University.

21.

Kim, P. S. (1998). Revolution in Public Service Delivery. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 1(2), 129-161.

22.

Kim, Soon-Hong (2012). A Study on the Impact of Customer Equity on Customer Loyalty in the Korean Retail Industry:Mediation of Customer Satisfaction and Switching Costs. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(11), 79-88.

23.

Kim, Suk-Woo (2010). SPSS AMOS. Seoul : Hak Ji Sa.

24.

Kim, Yong-Han, & Bae, Mu-Eun (2005). The Effect of Perceived Justice on Customer Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention in the Discount Stores Service. Journal of Distribution Science, 3(1), 23-42.

25.

Lapierre, J. P., & Chebat, J. C. (1999). Value Strategy Rather Than Quality Strategy: A case of Business-to-Business Professional Services. Journal of Business Research, 45, 235-246.

26.

Lee, Jung-Wan, & Kwag, Michael (2013). Green Growth and Sustainability: The Role of Tourism, Travel and Hospitality Service Industry in Korea. Journal of Distribution Science, 11-7, 15-22.

27.

Llosa, Sylvie, Chandon, Jean Louis, & Orsingher, Chiara (1998). An Empirical Study of SERVQUAL's Dimensionality. The Service Industries Journal, 18(2), 16-44.

28.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Introduction to Psychological Measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill.

29.

Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Process in Retail Setting. Journal of Retailing, 57(3), 25-48.

30.

Oliver, R. L. (1993). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Service Satisfaction. In Teresa A. Swartz, David E. Bowen, and Stephen W. Brown (eds). Advances in Services Marketing and Management (pp.65-86).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

31.

Oliver. R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach. Journal of Marketing, 53(Apr), 21-35.

32.

Oliver. R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(Nov), 460-469.

33.

Oliver. R. L. (1997). Satisfaction : A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. McGraw-Hill.

34.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(Fall), 41-50.

35.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.

36.

Parasuraman. A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1991). Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420-450.

37.

Parasuraman. A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Reassessment of Expectation as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Further Research. Journal of Marketing, 58(Jan), 111-124.

38.

Park, J. W., Robertson, R., & Wu, C. L. (2006). Modeling the Impact of Airline Service Quality and Marketing Variables on Passengers' Future Behavior Intentions. Transportation Planning and Technology, 29(1), 359-381.

39.

Perason. A., Hocking, S., Mott, S., & Riggs, A. (1993). Quality of Care in Nursing Homes: from the Resident's Perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 20-24.

40.

Powoaka, Samart (1996). The Role of Outcome Quality as a Determinant of Overall Service Quality in Different Categories of Services Industries: An Empirical Investigation. The Journal of Service Marketing, 10(2), 5-25.

41.

Rust, R. T., & Oliver, R. L. (1994). Service Quality: Insights and Managerial Implications from the Frontier. In Roland T. Rust and Richard L. Oliver (Eds.). Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice (pp.1-19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

42.

Sanjeev, Prashar, Adeshwar, Raja B., Parasaran, V. S., and Kumar, Vijay V. (2015). Factors Prompting Impulse Buying Behavior: Shoppers in Dubai. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(3), 5-15.

43.

Van Ryzin, C. G., & Gregg, G. (2004). The Measurement of Overall Citizen Satisfaction. Public Performance and Management Review, 27(3), 9-28.

44.

Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Repurchase Processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(4), 5-17.

45.

Williams, M. R. (1993). The Influence of Salespersons’ Customer Orientation on Buyer-seller Relationship Development. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 13(3), 271-287.

46.

Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (2012). Services Marketings (6ed). Boston ; London : Irwin/ McGraw-Hill.

The Journal of Distribution Science