- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS
ISSN : 1738-3110
Effect of Omni-Channel Use and Customer-Brand Relationship
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - The ICT(information and communications technologies) development is affecting consumer behaviors on selecting channel or distribution system. This study aims to advance our knowledge about the factors influencing omni-channel behaviors. This study considers the positive brand experience as the moderating variable into the relationship between omini-channel use intention and consumer brand relation. Also, the effect of positive brand experience on consumer-brand relation is researched. Research design, data, and methodology - This study conducted an empirical test with the subject as customers who purchase goods or service through on-off cross channel simultaneously. The research model is developed from prior literatures about influencing variables on channel selection. The structure of this study is designed to identify causal relationships between the variables. 268 survey data from the questionnaire survey which is conducted to target customers who use online and offline channels, is used for empirical analysis. This study validates generality with descriptive statistics and data reliability with Cronbach's alpha value. The exploratory factor analysis is used for value purification. Then, the confirmatory factor analysis is conducted for structural equation modeling. Finally, the execute structural equation modeling is analyzed to confirm the hypotheses Results - First, the two causal influences between perceived performance risk and the propensity of omni-channel and between price consciousness and the propensity of omni-channel are verified through the empirical test. Second, the result identifies that the propensity of omni-channel is influenced on consumer-brand relationship. Third, the AMOS analysis proves that the moderating variable, positive brand experience, has significant positive impact on consumer-brand relationship. This significant relationship is highly supported by the regression analysis between brand experience and propensity of omni-channel because it results that positive brand experience has positive impact on the propensity of omni-channel. All hypotheses are verified to be true. Conclusions - Based on the empirical result, this study confirms that perceived performance risk and price consciousness are the important factors influencing propensity of omni-channel. According to the additional analysis, the moderating variable and positive brand experience plays important role between the propensity of omni-channel and consumer-brand relationship. Furthermore, positive brand experience influences more on consumer-brand relationship than non-positive brand experience.
- keywords
- Omni-channel, Price Consciousness, Perceived Risk, Brand Experience
Reference
Aaker, D. A., & Joachimsthaler, E. (2000). The Brand Relationship Spectrum: The Key to the Brand Architecture Challenge, California Management Review, 42(4), 8-23.
Bell, D. R., Gallino, S., & Moreno, A. (2013). Inventory Showrooms and Customer Migration in Omni-channel Retail: The Effect of Product Information. Available at SSRN 2370535.
Bhalla, R. (2014). The Omni-channel Customer Experience: Driving Engagement Through Digitisation. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing, 1(4), 365-372.
Chatterjee, P. (2010). Multi-channel and Cross-channel Shopping Behavior Role of Consumer Shopping Orientations. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28(1), 9-24.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Fei, L. I. (2013). Connation, Cause and Countermeasures of Omni Channel Retailing: Further Discussion on How to Meet China Multi Channel Retailing Revolution Storm. Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University (Social Science), 2(2), 23-34.
Fournier, S., Dobscha, S., & Mick, D. G. (1998). The Premature Death of Relationship Marketing, Harvard Business Review, 76(1), 42-51.
Forsythe, S. M., & Shi, B. (2003). Consumer Patronage an Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.d
Frazer, M., & Stiehler, B. E. (2014, January), Omnichannel Retailing: The Merging of the Online and Off-line Environment. In Global Conference on Business & Finance Proceedings, 9(1), 655-665.
Hassan, A. M., Kunz, M. B., Pearson, A. W., & Mohamed, F. A. (2006), Conceptualization and Measurement of Perceived Risk in Online Shopping. Marketing Management Journal, 16(1), 138-147.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1997). Is There a Future for Retailing On the Internet, In Electronic Marketing and The Consumer (Ed. Peterson R. A.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kim, E. H., & Kim, M. J. (2011). The Effect of Distributor Private Brand Product Type on Consumer Attitude. The East Asian Journal of Business Management, 1(1), 13-20.
Kim K. B., & Kim B. G. (2016). Relationship among Brand Value Propositions, Brand Attitude and Brand Attachment Considering Consumer Involvement. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(2), 103-111.
Kim, P. J., Kim, M. S., Kim, W., Mehyaoui, O., & Youn, M. K. (2014). Effects on the Consumer Buying Behavior of an Agricultural Brand in South Korea, The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 5(2), 21-28.
Kim, Sang-Hoon, Park, Gye-Young, & Park, Hyun-Jung (2007). Factors Influencing Buyers' Choice of Online vs. Offline Channel at Information Search and Purchase Stages. Journal of Channel and Retailing, 12(3), 69-90.
Lazaris, C., & Vrechopoulos, A. (2014). From Multi-channel to “Omnichannel” Retailing: Review of the Literature and Calls for Research. In 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues, ICCMI.
Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study, Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 234-245.
Lichtenstein, D. R., Bloch, P. H., & Black, W. C. (1988). Correlates of Price Acceptability, Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 243-252.
Mitchell, V. W., Davies, F., Moutinho, L., & Vassos, V. (1999). Using Neural Networks to Understand Service Risk in the Holiday Product. Journal of Business Research, 46(2), 167–180
Nam, Y. J. (2014). Consumer Information Search and Consumer Confusion under Multi-channel Environment. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Catholic University.
Napolitano, M. (2013). Omni-channel Distribution: Moving at the Speed of "Now". Logistics Management, 52(6), 212-222.
Park, Seong Yeon & Lee, Yoo Kyung(2006). Effect of the Congruence between Brand Personality and Self-Image on Customer Satisfaction, Consumer- Brand Relationship and Brand Loyalty in Korean Culture, The Korea Journal of Advertising, 17, 7-24.
Piotrowicz, W., & Cuthbertson, R. (2014). Introduction to the Special Issue Information Technology in Retail: Toward Omnichannel Retailing. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18(4), 5-16.
Schmitt. B. H. (1999). Experiential Marketing. How to Get Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act and Relate to Your Company and Brands. New York: Free Press.
Simpson, L., & Lakner, H. B. (1993). Perceived Risk and Mail Order Shopping for Apparel. Journal of Consumer Studies & Home Economics, 17(4), 377-389.
Stone, Robert N., & Grønhaug, Kjell (1993). Perceived Risk: Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline. European Journal of Marketing, 27(3), 39–50.
Story, J., & Hess, J. (2006). Segmenting Customer-brand Relations: Beyond the Personal Relationship Metaphor. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(7), 406-413.
Verhoef, P. C., Neslin, S. A., & Vroomen, B. (2007). Multichannel Customer Management: Understanding the Research-shopper Phenomenon, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(2).
Yim, Duk Soon, & Han, Sang Seol (2016). Omnichannel's Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness Effect on Omnichannel Use and Customer-Brand Relationship. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(7), 83-90.
Yeom, Min-Sun (2015). Inconsistency between Information Search and Purchase Channel: Focusing on the “Showrooming Phenomenon”. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(9), 81-93.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations