바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Consumer Creativity, Emergent Nature and Engagement of Co-Creation: The Moderating Roles of Consumer Motivations

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.12, pp.107-118
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.12.201612.107
Kang, Seong-Ho
Kang, Woo-Seong

Abstract

Purpose - In today's markets, new technologies such as social network systems and user generated contents have provided consumers with access to unlimited amounts of information and an ability to communicate with other consumers in the world. Specially, the massive of the internet and the development of online communities and interactive platforms offer the potential to cocreate with a large number of consumers. Significant changes in marketplace suggest that simply being consumer oriented is not enough, so firms must learn from and collaborate with consumers to create values that meet their individual and dynamic needs. In these sense, emergent perspectives in marketing highlight new opportunities for co-opting consumers as a means to define and cocreate value through their engagement. Although the importance of consumer co-creation with firms, the current literature lacks the respond to two questions: (1) who are the most competent consumers for creating the values with firm? and (2) what are the stimulaters to help the consumers engage for co-creation? To this answer the question, this research investigate how to structure consumer motivations to encourage consumers to be more engaged for co-creation and what drives a consumer to get involved to respond to a call for co-creation. Research design, data, and methodology - To empirically test the hypotheses, a survey was conducted among consumers who had experienced the co-creation including upstream, downstream, autonomous, and sponsored co-creation with the firms. We collected a total of 343 responses. After we excluded 37 questionnaire because of incomplete responses, a total of 306 questionnaire remained. Working with a sample of 306 responses in Seoul and Kwangju, hierarchical moderated regression is employed to test research hypotheses. Results - The results indicated that consumer creativity and emergent nature are positively related to engagement in co-creation including upstream, downstream, autonomous, and sponsored co-creation. Also, the relationships between consumer creativity/emergent nature and engagement in co-creation were moderated by intrinsic motivation in case of upstream and downstream co-creation. Finally, interaction effects between consumer creativity/emergent nature and extrinsic motivation were not significant. Conclusions - These results suggest that marketing managers have to consider the consumer personality such as creativity and emergent nature and stimulate the intrinsic motivation of consumer to achieve the co-creation project successfully.

keywords
Consumer Creativity, Emergent Nature, Upstream Co-creation, Downstream Co-creation, Autonomous Co-creation, Engagement in Co-creation, Consumer Motivation

Reference

1.

Amabile, T. M., & Cheek, J. M. (1988). Microscopic and macroscopic creativity. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 11(1), 57-60.

2.

Boyd, E. D., Chandy, R. K., & Marcus, C. (2010). When do chief marketing officers affect firm value? A customer power explanation. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1162-1176.

3.

Burroughs, J. R., Mick, D. G., & Moreau, C. P. (2008). Toward a psychology of consumer creativity. In C. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. K. Kardes (eds.). Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 1011-1038), New York: Taylor & Francis.

4.

Business Wire (2001). New study identifies customer involvement as primary success factor in new product development. Business/Technology Editors, Business Wire, New York, March, 14.

5.

Chan, K. W., Yim, C. K., & Lam, S. S. (2010). Is customer participation in value creation a double-edged sword? Evidence from professional financial services across cultures. Journal of Marketing, 74(3), 48-64.

6.

Chang, W., & Taylor, S. A. (2016). The Effectiveness of customer participation in new product development: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing , 80(1), 47-64.

7.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.

8.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

9.

Etgar, M. (2008). A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 97-108.

10.

Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 43(4), 5322-527.

11.

Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., & Schreier, M. (2010). The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers' product demand. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 65-79.

12.

Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M., & Martinage, M. (1989). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(3), 212-227.

13.

Hoffman, D. L., Kopalle, P. K., & Novak, T. P. (2010). The "right" consumers for better concepts: Identifying consumers high in emergent nature to develop new product concepts. Journal of Marketing Research , 47(5), 854-864.

14.

Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(5), 450-464.

15.

Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283-296.

16.

Im, S. (1998). Invitation to creativity. Seoul: Kyobobook.

17.

Im, S., Montoya, M. M., & Workmanan, J. P. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of creativity in product innovation teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 170-185.

18.

Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software . New York, NY:SCRIBNER.

19.

Koo, H. G., & Rha, J.-Y. (2009). The concept of consumer-business collaboration: Its potential and its limitations shown by critical review of consumer participation marketing cases in Korea. Journal of Consumer Studies, 20(3), 99-133.

20.

Lee, S. M., Olson, D. L., & Trimi, S. (2012). Co-innovation:Convergenomics, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values. Management Decision , 50(5), 817-831.

21.

Liebeskind, J. P. (1997). Keeping organizational secrets:Protective institutional mechanisms and their costs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(3), 623-663.

22.

Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross sectional research design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114-121.

23.

Lorenzo-Romero, C., Constantinides, E., & Brunink, L. A. (2014). Co-creation: Customer integration in social media based product and service development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences , 148, 383-396.

24.

Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.). Handbook of perception and cognition: Thinking and problem solving (pp. 289-332), New York: Academic Press.

25.

MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness:Identifying and developing creativity . Buffalo, NY:Creative Education Foundation.

26.

Magnusson, P. R., Matthing, J., & Kristensson, P. (2003). Managing user involvement in service innovation:Experiments with innovating end users. Journal of Service Research, 6(2), 111-124.

27.

McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258-1265.

28.

Melton, H., & Hartline, M. D. (2015). Customer and employee co-creation of radical service innovations. Journal of Service Marketing , 29(2), 112-123.

29.

Miao, C. F., Evans, K. R., & Shaoming, Z. (2007). The role of salesperson motivation in sales control systems -Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation revisited. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 417-425.

30.

Moneta, G. B., & Siu, C. M. (2002). Trait intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, academic performance, and creativity in Hong Kong college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 664-683.

31.

Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2009). Virtual customer environments: Testing a model of voluntary participation in value co-creation activities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(4), 388-406.

32.

Ogawa, S., & Piller, F. T. (2006). Reducing the risks of new product development. Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 65-71.

33.

O' Hern, M. S., & Rindfleisch, A. (2009). Customer co-Creation: A typology and research agenda, In Naresh K. Malholtra (ed.). Review of Marketing Research (pp.84-106), NY: Sharpe.

34.

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78(January-February), 79-87.

35.

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(2), 5-14.

36.

Renzuli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring concept of giftedness: A development model or creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg, & J .E. Davidson (eds.). Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92), Cambridege: Cambridege University Press.

37.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

38.

Singh, R. P. (1979). Divergent thinking abilities and creative personality dimensions of bright adolescent boys and girls. Indian Educational Review, 13(2), 82-91.

39.

Son, J.-M., Kang, W., & Kang, S. (2015). Effects of co-creation on consumer attitude: Moderating roles of consumer motivation. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(12), 105-111.

40.

Spiro, R. L., & Weitz, B. A. (1990). Adaptive selling:Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. Journal of Marketing Research , 27(1), 61-69.

41.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 342-357.

42.

Venette, E., & Hamdi-Kidar, L. (2013). Co-creation with consumers: Who has the competence and wants to cooperate?. International Journal of Market Research , 55(4), 539-561.

43.

von Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Naβ, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. (2010). Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253-266.

44.

Williams P., & De Meyer, A. (2012). Ecosystem advantage:How to successfully harness the power of partners. California Management Review, 55(1), 24-46.

45.

Zwass, V. (2010). Co-creation: Toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(1), 11-48.

The Journal of Distribution Science