바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Effects of National Pride and National Attachment on Consumer Ethnocentrism

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.12, pp.89-97
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.12.201612.89
Choy, Jung-Hyuck
Choi, Soon-Hwa

Abstract

Purpose - In the major global markets, such as US and China, consumer ethnocentrism has been strengtened and there is a growing need for related study. This research aims to investigate the effects of national pride and national attachment on consumer ethnocentrism, using a nationally representative dataset from 2013 Korean General Social Survey. Based on the reviews of literature in social and political sciences, two dimensions of national pride were considered: national society pride which is based on positive evaluations on the nation's democracy condition or social security system, and national achievement pride which is based on positive evaluations regarding the country's achievements in the areas of technology, art, sports, and so on. Research design, data, and methodology - The authors developed a structural model in which two types of national pride, national society and achievement pride, are proposed to affect national attachment, thus influencing consumer ethnocentrism. 1,294 surveys were used for empirical analysis. The hypotheses were tested by utilizing SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 21.0. The unidimensionality of each construct and the nomological validity were supported from the results of factor analyses and correlation analysis. Results - It was found that both national society pride and national achievement pride have significant and positive effects on national attachment. Consumers who show stronger pride on the social systems or the global achievements of Korea are more likely to remain being a citizen of the country and support the country even in wrong. Also, there was a significant and positive relationship between national attachment and consumer ethnocentrism. Korean consumers who have stronger attachment to Korea tend to express higher ethnocentrism to protect Korean labor market and to promote economic development of the country. Conclusions - The findings of this study showed that companies and government need to emphasize the country's advanced social environments or global competitiveness in technology, sports, art, and so on, to boost national attachment. With a deeper understanding on the relationships among national pride, national attachment, and consumer ethnocentrism, the authors expect that both local and foreign companies in Korea will be able to develop more effective marketing strategies and to achieve sustainable competitive advantage.

keywords
National Pride, National Attachment, Consumer Ethnocentrism, Retail Strategy

Reference

1.

Aaker, D. A. (1992). The value of brand equity. Journal of Business Strategy, (July/Aug.), 27-32.

2.

Ahn, J. (2012). The effect of consumer ethnocentrism in China: Differences by consumer lifestyles and moderating eject of country images. International Business Journal, 23(3), 91-121.

3.

Aaker, J., Fournier, Susan, & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(June), 1-16.

4.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988), On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

5.

Bannister, J. P., & Saunders, J. A. (1978). UK consumers'attitudes towards imports: The measurement of national stereotype image. European Journal of Marketing, 12(8), 562-570.

6.

Belk, Russel W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(December), 265-280.

7.

Blank, T., & Schmidt, P. (2003). National identity in a United Germany: Nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Political Psychology, 24(2), 289-312.

8.

Boston Consulting Group(2016). Ten Things to Know About African Consumers. Retrieved May 22, 2016, from https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/globalization_consumer_insight_ten_things_to_know_ab out_african_consumers/

9.

Breuilly, J. (1993). Nationalism and the state. Manchester:Manchester University Press.

10.

Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745–778.

11.

Clarke, I., Shankarmahesh, M. N., & Ford, J. B. (2000). Consumer ethnocentrism, materialism, and values: A four country study. AMA Winter Educators’Conference Proceedings, San Antonio, TX.: AMA.

12.

Coenders, M., Gijsberts, M., & Scheepers, P. (2004). Chauvinism and patriotism in 22 countries,” in M. Gijsberts, L. Hagendoorn, & P. Scheepers (ed.). Nationalism and Exclusion of Migrants:Cross-national Comparisons(pp. 29–69), Aldershot:Ashgate.

13.

Cohen, J. (1996). For love of country: Debating the limits of patriotism (ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.

14.

Collins, Nancy L., & Read, Stephen J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644-663.

15.

Cutura, M. Cicic, M., & Agic, E. (2014). Exploring the influence of national pride on consumers’ orientation towards domestic products. 5th EMAC Regional Conference Proceeding, 49-57.

16.

Fournier, S. (1998). Consumer and their brands:Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(March), 343-373.

17.

Ha, S. E., & Jang, S. (2014). National identity, national pride, and happiness: The case of South Korea. Social Indicators Research, 121(2), 471–482. DOI:10.1007/s11205-014-0641-7

18.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis with readings (6th ed.). New York: Macmillam Publishing Company.

19.

Han, C. (1988). The role of consumer patriotism in the choice of domestic versus foreign products. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(3), 25-32.

20.

Han, C., & Won, S. (2016). An empirical investigation on cross-country differences in consumer ethnocentrism. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 31(Feb.), 85-107.

21.

Hjerm, M. (1998). National identities, national pride and xenophobia: A comparison of four western countries. Acta Sociologica, 41(4), 335-347.

22.

Kim, Y., Kim, Y., Park, S., & Lee, H. (2012). A study on dimension of national identity universal perception. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(2), 127-163.

23.

Klein, J. G., & Ettensoe, R. (1999). Consumer animosity and consumer ethnocentrism: An analysis of unique antecedents. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 11(4), 5-24.

24.

Marketing China (2015). Gentlemen Marketing Agency. Retrieved May 22, 2015, from http://www.marketingchina.com

25.

Meuleman, R., Bekhuis, H., Lubbers, M., & Scheepers, P. (2012). Own culture first? Nationalism and the preference for national cultural goods. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4), 436-458.

26.

Pimentel, R. W., & Reynolds, K. E. (2004). A model for consumer devotion: Affective committment with proactive sustaining behaviors. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2004(05), 1-45.

27.

Shankarmahesh, M. N. (2006). Consumer ethnocentrism:An integrative review of its antecedents and consequences. International Marketing Review, 23(2), 146-172.

28.

Sharma, S., Shimp, T. A., & Shin, J. (1995). Consumer ethnocentrism: A test of antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 26-37.

29.

Shimp, T. A., & Sharma, S. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 280-289.

30.

Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways: The sociological importance of usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Moral. New York: Ginn & Co.

31.

Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). The psychological structure of pride: A tale of two facets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 92, 506–525.

32.

Wallendorf, Melanie, & Arnould, Eric J. (1988). My favorite things: A cross-cultural inquiry into object attachment, possessiveness, and social linkage. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(March), 531-547.

The Journal of Distribution Science