- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS
ISSN : 1738-3110
Customer's Time Orientation: Moderating Effects on the Service Convenience-Shopping Performance Linkages in Retail Contexts
Park, Chul-Ju
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - Understanding how service convenience drives shopping performance is imperative for retailers such as department and large discount stores. Retailers have to enhance shopping productivity by reducing the costs of shopping, as convenience triggers customers' perceived shopping value, leading to customer satisfaction, and ultimately patronage behavior. Consumers, generally considering time as a scarce resource, are more sensitive to the time costs of tasks in regard to shopping trip, differently from forming perceptions of convenience in time orientation. Therefore, this study attempts to examine the moderating effects of consumers' time orientation on the relationships among service convenience of retailers and shopping performances such as shopping value and service performances. Research design, data, and methodology - The department and discount store chains were chosen as the point of analysis in this study. Data were collected from a survey of real-life consumers and all respondents were screened to ensure only those who had visited in the department and discount store chains within past six month prior to the day of data collection. Out of 600 self-reported surveys that were distributed, a total of 530 responses were returned and after excluding 20 incomplete responses, the final sample size was 510. The three hypotheses were proposed and tested in this study. The one hypothesis was on the moderating effects of time orientation for the effects of service convenience on shopping value (hedonic and utilitarian shopping value). The other two hypotheses were on the comparisons between high and low time-oriented customers with the effects in shopping value from service performance. Hierarchical moderated regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses. Results - The results suggest that the effect of service convenience on utilitarian shopping value and the positive effect of utilitarian shopping value on customer satisfaction are greater in low time orientation than high time orientation customers. Conversely, when customers are highly oriented toward time, the effects of hedonic shopping value on customer satisfaction and revisit intention are greater than for customers who are lowly oriented toward time. Conclusions - This study has two-fold significance. First, this study contributes to the consumer behavior and services marketing literature by incorporating customers' time orientation into the service convenience-shopping performance. Although the effect of service convenience on shopping performance might differ from customers' perceptions concerning shopping, there has been little investigation or comparison between customers' perception on time. This study is a first attempt to consider how the effects of service convenience on shopping value and service performance vary with differing levels of customers' time orientation. This study advances prior studies by showing that the service convenience-shopping value and service convenience-service performance relationships vary across different combinations of the customer's time orientation. The findings of this study suggest that the retailers need to enhance the experiential aspects of the stores for their high time-oriented customers. Conversely, for the low time-oriented customers, the retailers should boost the visual distinctiveness and ease of store navigation.
- keywords
- Service Convenience, Time Orientation, Shopping Value
Reference
Aiken, Leona S., & Stephen, G. West (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic Shopping Motivations. Journal of Retailing, 79(2), 77-95.
Babin, B. J., & Attaway, J. S. (2000). Atmospheric Affect as a Tool for Creating Value and Gaining Share of Customer. Journal of Business Research, 49(2), 91-99.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170.
Becker, G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493-517.
Bellenger, D. N., Robertson, D. H., & Greenberg, B. A. (1977). Shopping Center Patronage Motives. Journal of Retailing, 53(2), 29-38.
Berry, L. L., Seiders, K., & Grewal, D. (2002). Understanding Service Convenience. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 1-17.
Bloch, P. H., Ridgway, N. M., & Dawson, S. A. (1994). The Shopping Mall as Consumer Habitat. Journal of Retailing, 70(1), 23-42.
Brown, L. G. (1990). Convenience in Services Marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, 4(1), 53-59.
Byun, Jeoung-Woo, & Seo, Hyoun-Suk (2010). The Effect of Multi-dimensional Service Convenience on Perceived Value, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intention. Korean Journal of Hospitality Administration, 19(1), 55-72.
Collier, J. E., & Sherrell, D. L. (2010). Examining the Influence of Control and Convenience in a Self-Service Setting. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(4), 490-509.
Colwell, S. R., Aung, M., Kanetkar, V., & Holden, A. L. (2008). Toward a Measure of Service Convenience: Multiple-item Scale Development and Empirical Test. Journal of Services Marketing, 22(2), 160-169.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815-822.
Farquhar, J. D., & Rowley, J. (2009). Convenience: A Services Perspective. Marketing Theory, 9(4), 425-438.
Gagliano, K. B., & Hathcote, J. (1994). Customer Expectations and Perceptions of Service Quality in Retail Apparel Specialty Stores. Journal of Services Marketing, 8(1), 60-69.
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Han, Sang-Lin, & Lee, Seong-Ho (2011). Effect of Service Convenience on the Relationship Performance in B2B Markets: Mediating Effect of Relationship Factors. Journal of Distribution Research, 16(4), 65-93.
Haytko, D. L., & Baker, J. (2004). It’s All at the Mall: Exploring Adolescent Girls’ experiences. Journal of Retailing, 80(1), 67-83.
Heinonen, K. (2006). Temporal and Spatial E-Service Value. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(4), 380-400.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
Jackson, V., Stoel, L., & Brantley, A. (2011). Mall Attributes and Shopping Value: Differences by Gender and Generational Cohort. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(1), 1-9.
Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G. J., & Berning, C. K. (1976). Time and Consumer Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Overview. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(4), 320-339.
Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., & Arnold, M. J. (2006). Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value: Investigating Differential Effects on Retail Outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 974-981.
Kim, Mi-Jeong, & Park, Chul-Ju (2014). Measuring Service Convenience for Korean Retail Stores: Scale Development and Empirical Testing. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(9), 95-99.
Kim, Mi-Jeong, & Park, Chul-Ju (2015). Effects of Consumers'Perceived Service Convenience: Differences between Department Stores and General Super Markets. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(2), 85-94.
Kim, Young., Kim, Jang-Hyun., Bae, Il-Hyun, & Kim, Sung-Bae (2012). The Effects of Diversification Strategy in Convenience Store on Service Convenience and Customer Satisfaction. Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management Review, 15(4), 5-16.
Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in Value Orientations. Evanston, IL: Row-Paterson.
Ko, G., & Gentry, J. W. (1991). The Development of Time Orientation Measures for Use in Cross-Cultural Research. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 135-142.
Lloyd, A. E., Chan, R. Y. K., Yip, L. S. C., & Chan, A. (2014). Time Buying and Time Saving: Effects on Service Convenience and the Shopping Experience at the Mall. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(1), 36-49.
Lotz, S. L., Eastlick, M. A., Mishra, A., & Shim, S. (2010). Understanding Patrons’ Participation in Activities at Entertainment Malls. International Journal of Retail &Distribution Management, 38(6), 402-422.
Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience:Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 451-466.
Parsons, A. G. (2002). Non-functional Motives for Online Shoppers: Why We Click. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(5), 380-392.
Robinson, J. P. (1977). How Americans Use Time: A Social-Psychological Analysis of Everyday Behavior. New York: Praeger Press.
Rokkan, A. I., Heide, J. B., & Wathne, K. H. (2003). Specific Investments in Marketing Relationships: Expropriation and Bonding Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), 210-224.
Seiders, K., Voss, G. B., Godfrey, A. L., & Grewal, D. (2007). SERVCON: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Service Convenience Scale. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 35(1), 144-156.
Stoel, L., Wickliffe, V., & Lee, K. H. (2004). Attribute Beliefs and Spending as Antecedents to Shopping Value. Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1067-1073.
Westbrook, R. A., & Oliver, R. L. (1991). The Dimensionality of Consumption Emotion Patterns and Consumer Satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 84-91.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations