ISSN : 1738-3110
Purpose - Recently on-the-job training (OJT) has become the most preferred training and development method with the emergence of the concept that workplace is the best place where learning take place. But many researchers argue that OJT is not helpful for the performance of organization because OJT is not systematic and mostly depend on quality of trainer. Since Jacobs & McGriffin introduced S-OJT (structured OJT), there has been plenty of researches. But most of the researches have focused mainly on employee's attitude and organizational performance caused by S-OJT and neglected a holistic approach of S-OJT as a system. S-OJT need to be analyzed comprehensively to understand training performance because S-OJT is operated as a system consist of input, process, and organizational context. Although S-OJT may create unintended consequences, there were few researches to explore them. Thus, the purpose of this study is to identify the critical success factors for S-OJT and to find unintended consequences of it. Research design, data and methodology - We conducted a case study on M business unit of A company which developed and has been implementing S-OJT program for years. We designed and prepared the process, collected and analyzed data for the study. We set the theoretical framework to analyze the case after reviewing theories and previous studies on S-OJT. We collected and analyzed internal reports and interview results of the employees of the M business unit. We tried to collect as many information as possible to secure the validity of the research results. Results - The critical success factors identified in the study are as follow. First, it is important to select and train proper trainers for S-OJT. Second, it is needed to develop structured training module. Third, organization have to use effective communication system like on-line community. Forth, trainer should have proper skills for training such as facilitating skill, coaching skill, and delivering skill etc. Fifth, proper learning place is needed. Sixth, organizational support is important especially, immediate supervisor support and concern is critical. Eleventh, it is needed to consider situational contexts. Among them, overload to the trainer will affect the effectiveness of S-OJT. In this study, we found an additional unintended consequence. "To teach is the best way to learn." Experience as a trainer give employee an opportunity to organize one's knowledge and skill and to attain facilitation skill, coaching skill, and relation skill. Thus, organization may use S-OJT to train the potential talent. Conclusions - Many organizations introduced S-OJT to train the newcomers because S-OJT drew attention as an important tool to develop employees. Following this trend, there has been increasing number of researches to find the results of S-OJT and identify the determinants of S-OJT success. However, most of the researches concentrated on finding effects of some factors neglecting holistic approach. This study tried to identify critical success factors affecting effectiveness of S-OJT by using case study and find additional unintended consequence. The results of the study will be useful for organizations which have a plan to adopt S-OJT.
Bae, Hyun-Kyung, Cho, Dae-Yeon, Yoon, So-Kyum, & Lee, Yun-Soo (2013). A study on path analysis of Kolb's experiential learning process in the structured OJT. Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 45(4), 125-143.
Cho, Sei-Hyoung, & Yoon, Dong-Yeol (2011). The effect of structured on-the-Job training on organizational performance. Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(2), 1-19.
Jacobs, R. L. (2003). Structured on-the-job training: Unleashing employee expertise in the workplace (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Jacobs, R. L. (2010). Structured on-the-job training (Lee, Chan translation). Seoul, Korea: Credu.
Jacobs, R. L., & Hruby-Moore, M. T. (1998). Learning from failure:A cost-benefit analysis study which resulted in unfavorable financial outcomes. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 11(2), 93-100.
Jacobs, R. L., Jones, M. J., & Neil, S. (1992). A case study in forecasting the financial benefits of unstructured and structured on-the-job training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 3(2), 133-139.
Jacobs, R. L., & McGriffin, T. D. (1987). A human performance system using a structured on-the-job training approach. Performance and Instruction, 25(7), 8-11.
Jeon, Eun-Ji, Song, Young-Sun, & Lee, Hee-Su (2011). The influence of the characteristics of S-OJT programs on organizational commitment and turnover intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 33(4), 177-199.
Lee, Chan, Choi, Young-jun, & Paek, Jee-Yon (2013). The relationship between training transfer and the related variables of the S-OJT trainees in small-medium sized enterprises. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 32(5), 47-68.
Noe, R. A. (2008). Employee training development(4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Park, Han-Kyu, & Lee, Chan (2011). The moderating effect of organizational support on the relationship between S-OJT delivery action and organizational commitment, S-OJT delivery action and job involvement. Journal of Employment and Skills Development, 14(2), 107-126.
Park, Rho-Yun (2015). Determinants of social entrepreneur’s absorptive capacity: Focusing on experience and social network. Korean Journal of Human Resource Development, 18(3), 109-145.
Rha, Hyun-Mi, & Shim, Ji-Hyun (2014). Development of S-OJT training program for a software company based on national competency standards(NCS): A case of firm A. Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Educators, 39(2), 81-100.
Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (1990). Structured on-the-job training (SOJT) as perceived by HRD professionals. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 3(3), 12–26.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Zolingen, S. J., Streumer, J. N., DeJong, R., & Klink, M. R. (2000). Implementing on-the-job training: Critical success factors. International Journal of Training and Development, 4(3), 208-216.