바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Comparative Analysis on Efficiency and Productivity for Korea, Japan and Global Parcel Delivery Companies

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.3, pp.73-83
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.3.201603.73
Ma, Jin-Hee
Ahn, Young-Hyo
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - The parcel delivery service(courier) industry all over the world has been expanding its market so far, but its growth has been declining in recent years. In this situation, most parcel delivery companies are having trouble with managing themselves because of the pressure from the customer to increase service level and decrease the rate. The purpose of this study is to provide ways to improve competitive advantages of the parcel delivery service industry by evaluating the multi-period operating efficiency of Korea, Japan and global service providers. Research design, data, and methodology - The data for the period of 2011 to 2014 were collected from the annual reports published by parcel delivery companies. In this study, we analyze the marketability (revenue), profitability (operating profits), and management conditions (net profits) of parcel service companies by combining information on human resources (number of employees) and material resources (total assets and equity). Therefore, the number of employees, total assets, and equity are selected as input variables, and revenue, operating profits, and net profits as the output variables. In this study, DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) is used to measure the comparative efficiency and MPI (Malmquist Productivity Index) is used to analyze the trend of change of the efficiency for a multi-year period. Results - The operational efficiency scores of medium-sized parcel delivery companies in Korea are higher than other larger competitors such as Korean, Japan and Global larger companies. As of 2014, Logen(1.878) was found to be the most efficient parcel delivery enterprise, followed by KGB (1.224), and Kyoungdong(1.002). Otherwise, Hanjin(0.235), CJ(0.262), Hyundai Logistics(0.657), DHL(0.611), UPS(0.766), FedEx(0.498), TNT(0.350), Yamato(0.762) and Sagawa(0.520), larger sized companies, were done inefficiently. The productivity of parcel delivery companies is influenced by endogenous factors as well as exogenous ones such as changes in business environment and technological advances. Conclusions - Korean medium-sized companies have relatively high efficiency scores in operation. That is why they still survive the competitive market in Korea where market restructuring on the industry has been expected to be conducted for many years. The reason why medium-sized couriers had higher efficient scores than larger couriers is that most of couriers spend more operating expenses versus unit price of delivery which is the amount of money that is needed in order to send a package by parcel service. So the delivery unit price must be taken into account by all the expenses associated with the cost of fuel, labor and maintenance expenses for facilities, etc. therefore, the unit price must be increased to strengthen business competitive power. In order for the industry to have more competitive advantage, the companies need to make profits by increasing demand volume and raising the delivery rate to provide high-quality delivery service to customers. And both endogenous and exogenous change must take precedence in order to strengthen their competitiveness.

keywords
DEA, Malmquist Productivity Index, Management Efficiency, Parcel Delivery Service

Reference

1.

Ahn, Young-Hyo, & Min, Hokey (2013). The Comparative Evaluation of Airport Operating Efficiency and Implications for Incheon International Airport. Korea Logistics Review, 23(1), 171-199.

2.

Ahn, Young-Hyo, Oh, Seung-Chul, Cho, Yong-Hun, & Kim, Yong-Woo (2011). A Study on Construction Planning and Economic Validation of a Logistics Center for Small & Medium Businesses. Korea Logistics Review, 21(5), 129-153.

3.

Andriankaja, Dina (2012). The Location of Parcel Service Terminals: Links With the Locations of Clients. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 677-686.

4.

Bae, Ki-Hyoung(2012). The Analysis of Economic Effects of Door to door transport Industry. Korea Logistics Review, 22(1), 163-181.

5.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in DEA. Management Science, 130(9), 1078-1092.

6.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring efficiency of decision making unit. European Journal of Operations Research, 2, 429-444.

7.

Charnes, A., Copper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M. (1994). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Boston, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

8.

Choi, Jong-Yeol, & Park, Jea-Jeon (2011). Efficiency analysis for Korean trucking companies based on the Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA). Journal of Korea Contents Association, 11(1), 317-328.

9.

Go, Dae-Kyung, Woo, Su-Han, &, Kang, Hyo-Won (2014). A Study on the Business Performance of Shipping and Logistics Companies Using Data Environment Analysis. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 30(2), 93-112.

10.

Goo, Hoon-Young (2010). A Method of Economic Analysis for RFID Applications Focused on Courier Sector. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 15(1), 119-137.

11.

Jang, Myoung-Hee (2010). Relative Efficiency of Korea Trucking Transport Business Using DEA Model. Journal of Korea Contents Association, 10(12), 328-341.

12.

Jung, Ki-Ho, & Jung, Won-Jae (2008). Mathematical Model for Collaborating on the Pick-up and Delivery Services in the Express Courier Service Industry. Korea Logistics Review, 18(2), 131-147.

13.

Kim, Geun-Sub, & Kwak, Kyu-Seok (2004). The Price Elasticity in the Parcel Service Market by Benefit Segmentation. Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, 2(22), 7-18.

14.

Kim, Soon-Hong, Ahn, Young-Hyo, & Oh, Seung-Chul (2014). Efficiency Analysis for TV Home Shopping Companies Using DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis). Journal of Distribution Science, 12(8), 5-15.

15.

Kook, Woo-Kag (2013). An Empirical Study on the Efficiency and Productivity of Logistics Firms Using DEA and Malmquist. Korea Logistics Review, 23(1), 29-49.

16.

Lee, Myung-Bok (2013). A Study on the Improvement and Development Plan for Small Package Door to Door Services. Korea Logistics Review, 23(5), 263-295.

17.

Lee, Young-Min (2014). An Impact that Service Quality Has for Customer’s Repurchase in Internet Shopping Malls. Korea Logistics Review, 24(1), 3-21.

18.

Leem, Byung-Hak (2010). Evaluating Efficiency of Financial Performance for Korean’s Shipping Firms: An Application of DEA and Window Analysis. Korea Logistics Review, 20(4), 145-160.

19.

Ma, Jin-Hee, Ja, Yoon-Ho, & Ahn, Young-Hyo (2015). Evaluating the Multi-Period Management Efficiency of Domestic Online-Shopping Companies. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(4), 45-53.

20.

McWilliams, D. (2014). Performance modelling and analysis of transshipment terminals in the parcel delivery industry. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 4(16), 493-522.

21.

Moon, Sun-Ung, Jun, In-Woo, & Kim, Se-Min (2014). A Study on the Customer Satisfaction of Courier Company Service in Internet Shopping. Korea Logistics Review, 24(1), 65-88.

22.

Oh, Se-Young (2002). The Present Situation of Courier Service Industry and It's Improvement Plan. The Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 4, 97-124.

23.

Oh, Seung-Chul, & Ahn, Young-Hyo (2013). Efficiency Analysis for Certified Integrated Logistics Companies Using DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index. Korean Journal of Logistics, 21(2), 93-112.

24.

Oh, Young-Tek (2007). A Study on the Plan of Courier Logistics Business. Korea Logistics Review, 17(20), 205-225.

25.

Park, Cha-Mi, & Kim, Tae-Seung (2014). A Study on the Efficiency of Logistics Industry in Korea using DEA-SBM. Korean Journal of Logistics, 22(4), 37-47.

26.

Sung, Sin-Je, & Kang, Sang-Mok (2011). The Comparison of Efficiency for Busan Warehousing Firms using DEA and SFA. Korea Logistics Review, 21(3), 155-178.

The Journal of Distribution Science