바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1738-3110

Article Contents

Prev Next
Early Access e-Submission

Vol.14 No.4

Citation Share

Impact of Selling, General and Administrative Expenses on Financial Sustainability of IT Companies Listed in S&P 500

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.4, pp.13-20
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.4.201604.13
Seetharaman, Seetharaman
Pitta, Santhikumar
Moorthy, Krishna
Saravanan, Saravanan
Seetharaman,, S. , Pitta,, S. , Moorthy,, K. , & Saravanan,, S. (2016). Impact of Selling, General and Administrative Expenses on Financial Sustainability of IT Companies Listed in S&P 500. The Journal of Distribution Science, 14(4), 13-20, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.4.201604.13

Abstract

Purpose - This paper attempts to determine the importance of financial sustainability and the impact of Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A) on the financial sustainability of the IT industry. Research design, data, and methodology - Primarily the impact of SG&A expenditure on the sales revenue, assets, gross margins and profit is ascertained. After that the impact of SG&A expenditure, sales revenue, assets, gross margins and profit on the financial sustainability i.e., return on assets is worked out. Finally the impacts of financial sustainability i.e., return on assets on total enterprise value and market valuation multiples are found out. Results - The empirical result shows that SG&A expenditure most strongly impacted sales revenue, assets, gross margins and profit positively. Financial sustainability impacted in mixed manner with SG&A expenditure, sales revenue, assets, gross margins and profit. Assets and gross margins have weak positive impact on financial sustainability. Sales revenue has no impact on financial sustainability. Finally financial sustainability had moderate positive impact on total enterprise value and had no impact on market valuation multiples. Conclusions - SG&A expense has moderate positive impact on the financial sustainability and magnitude is very low.

keywords
Information Technology, SG&amp, A Expenses, Financial Sustainability, Return on Asset, Gross Margin, Revenue, Profit, Total Enterprise Value, Market Multiples

Reference

1.

Anderson, Mark C., Banker, Rajiv D., Huang, Rong, &Janakiraman, Surya N. (2007). Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 22(1), 1-28.

2.

Andras,T. L., & Srinivasan, S. S. (2003). Advertising intensity and R&D intensity: Difference across industries and their impact on firms’performance. International Journal of Business and Economics, 2(2), 81-90.

3.

Banker, Rajiv D., Huang, Rong, & Natarajan, Ramachandran (2011). Equity incentives and long-term value created by SG&A expenditure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(3), 794-830.

4.

Banker, Rajiv, Huang, Rong, & Natarajan, Ram (2006). Does SG&A expenditure create a long-lived asset?. Unpublished paper, Temple university, Baruch College-City University of New York and University of Dallas at Texas.

5.

Baumgarten, Daniel, Bonenkamp, Ute, & Homburg, Carsten (2010). The information content of the SG&A ratio. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 22, 1-22.

6.

Biddle, G., Bowen, R., & Wallace, J. (1997). Does EVA beat earnings? Evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 301–336.

7.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (2000). Beyond computation:Information technology, organizational transformation and business practices. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 23-48.

8.

Chen, Rachel (2014). An integrated sustainable business and development system: thoughts and opinions. Sustainability, 6(10), 6862-6871.

9.

Choi, Yongrok, & Yu, Yanni(2014). The influence of perceived corporate sustainability practices on employees and organizational performance. Sustainability, 6(1), 348-364.

10.

Cleland, A., & Bruno, A. (1996). The market value process:Bridging customer & shareholder value. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

11.

Converse, Paul D. (1955). Drug store expenses and margins. Journal of Marketing, 20(1), 49-50.

12.

Dobre, Elena, Stanila, Georgiana Oana, & Brad, Laura (2015). The Influence of environmental and social performance on financial performance: Evidence from Romania’s listed entities. Sustainability, 7(3), 2513-2553.

13.

Eli, Amir, Eti, Einhorn, & Itay, Kama (2013). Extracting sustainable earnings from profit margins. European Accounting Review, 22(4), 685-718.

14.

Enekwe, ChineduInnocent, Okwo, Ifeoma Mary, & Ordu, Monday Matthew (2013). Financial ratio analysis as a determinant of profitability in Nigerian pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Business & Management, 8(8), 107-117.

15.

Friedman, Milton (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

16.

Friedman, Milton (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970.

17.

Gallego-Alvarez, Isabel, Vicente-Galindo, M. Purificación, Galindo-Villardón, M. Purificación, & Rodríguez-Rosa, Miguel (2014). Environmental performance in countries worldwide:Determinant factors and multivariate analysis. Sustainability, 6(11), 7807-7832.

18.

He,Yongxiu, Liu, Yangyang Xia, Tian, Du, Min, & Guo, Hong zhen (2014). The optimal price ratio of typical energy sources in Beijing based on the computable general equilibrium model. Energies, 7(5), 2961-2984.

19.

Kotler, Philip (1972). Marketing Management (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

20.

Kurapatskie, Brent, & Darnall, Nicole (2013). Which corporate sustainability activities are associated with greater financial payoffs?. Business Strategy & the Environment, 22(1), 49-61.

21.

Kwon, Gee-Jung (2011). Are internal cash flows the source of advertising expenses? Evidence from Korea. International Journal of Business & Management,6(10), 37-49.

22.

LePoire, David J. (2014). Review of potential characterization techniques in approaching energy and sustainability. Sustainability, 6(3), 1489-1503.

23.

Leveseque, Moren, Joglekar, Nitin, & Davies, Jane (2012). A comparison of revenue growth at recent-IPO and established firms: The influence of SG&A, R&D and COGS. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 47-61.

24.

Lopez-Valeiras, Ernesto, Gomez-Conde, Jacobo, & Gil, David Naranjo (2015).Sustainable innovation, management accounting and control systems, and international performance. Sustainability, 7(3), 3479-3492;

25.

Mithas, Sunil, Tafti, Ali, Indranil, Bardhan, & Goh, Jie Mein (2012). Information technology and firm profitabilty. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 205-224.

26.

Ong, Chorng-Shyong, & Chen, Poyen (2013). Information technology capability-enabled performance, future performance, and value. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(6), 669-682.

27.

Ou, Jane A. (1990). The information content of non-earnings accounting numbers as earnings predictors. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1), 144-163.

28.

Rogers, Shannon H., Gardner, Kevin H., & Carlson, Cynthia H. (2013). Social capital and walkability as social aspects of sustainability. Sustainability, 5(8), 3473-3483.

29.

Sánchez-Medina, Patricia S., Corbett, Jack,& Toledo-López, Arcelia (2011). Environmental innovation and sustainability in small handicraft businesses in Mexico. Sustainability, 3(7), 984-1002.

30.

Shen, Lixin, Govindan, Kannan, & Shankar, Madan (2015). Evaluation of barriers of corporate social responsibility using an analytical hierarchy process under a fuzzy environment—A textile case. Sustainability, 7(3), 3493-3514.

31.

Shokravi, Samaneh. & Kurnia, Sherah (2014).A Step towards developing a sustainability performance measure within industrial networks. Sustainability, 6(4), 2201-2222.

32.

Sidhanta, Somroop, & Chakrabarty, Anindya (2010). Promotional mix and corporate performance - An empirical study. Paradigm (Institute of Management Technology), 14(1), 97-110.

33.

Smith, Adam (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations 1 (1st ed.). London: W. Strahan. Retrieved December 7, 2012, from http://www.worldcat. org/title/inquiry-into-the-nature-and-causes-of- the-wealthof-nations/oclc/17382395

34.

Smith, Adam (1759). The invisible hand. New York: Penguin Group. October 27, 2009.

35.

Stasz, John (2003). Integration strategy key to margin management. Financial Executive, 19(5), 44-48.

36.

Tian, Xuefeng, Song, Jia, & Li, Ning (2012). An analysis of value-creating ability of listed companies in Shandong island blue economic zone Using EVA. Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 11(3), 17-30.

37.

Vitezic, Neda, Vuko, Tina, & Morec, Barbara (2012). Does financial performance have an impact on corporate sustainability and CSR disclosure – A case of Croatian companies. Journal of Business Management, 5, 40-47.

38.

Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. M. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.

39.

Wagner, Marcus, & Blom, Joris (2011). The reciprocal and non-linear relationship of sustainability and financial performance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(4), 418-432.

40.

Woo, Chungwon, Chung, Yanghon, Chun, Dongphil, & Seo, Hangyeol (2014). Exploring the impact of complementary assets on the environmental performance in manufacturing SMEs. Sustainability, 6(10), 7412-7432.

41.

Wright, Malcolm (2009). A new theorem for optimizing the advertising budget. Journal of Advertising Research, 49(2), 164-169.

42.

Yang, Yang, Yang, Xiaohua, & Doyle, Barry W. (2013). The location strategy and firm value creation of Chinese multinationals. Multinational Business Review, 21(3), 232-256.

The Journal of Distribution Science

Early Access e-Submission OA Policy