바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Study on Effect of SCM Performance and ERP Diffusion through Supplier Development Maturity Model

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.5, pp.71-80
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.5.201605.71
Song, Jang-Gwen
Park, Kyung-Hye

Abstract

Purpose - In case of automobile parts, there has been a lot of progress in the study on supplier development plans and SCM in industrial progress study as well as on the relationship between ERP and SCM. But supplier development program providers have researched on SCM performance in accordance with the interests of the supplier development program most, thus, buyers were knowledgeable about the earlier program performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to prove correlation factor, supplier factor, purchaser factor affecting SCM performance and ERP activating diffusion through the process of supplier development. Supplier development maturity formation model is considered important variables as mediators related to the procedure. Finally, the performance formation model of the supplier development maturity through supplier development factor would be presented as the outcome of this study. Research design, data, and methodology - Data gathering was as follows: questionnaires were delivered to 87 companies that have business connection with H Company. The empirical research to test our hypothesis was grounded on statistical analysis (adapting SPSS 19.0 & AMOS 19.0). The hypothesis is that the supplier development factor variables consist of correlation factor, supplier factor, purchaser factor, and have non-negative effects on the next variables: mediators such as supplier development maturity; and the supplier development maturity variables have a positive effect on the next variables: ERP activating diffusion, ERP activating diffusion has a non-negative effect on supply chain performance. We experimented the hypothesized model using path analysis with latent variables. Results - First, it was known that cooperation <H1>, reliability <H2>, comprehension on the purpose of SDP <H3>, adaptation of change <H4>, knowledge transfer program <H5>, have significant positive effects on supplier development maturity. Second, supplier development maturity has positive effects significantly on ERP activating diffusion <H6>. Finally, the causal relationships from ERP activating diffusion to SCM performance <H7> were significantly accepted. Its significance, as through the hypotheses, presented a structural model for the elaboration, suppliers develop maturity, and ultimately SCM performance that affect ERP leveraging spread beyond the concept of maturity of information system. Therefore, it was a mainstay of research on the existing ERP has they believed. Conclusion - First, with the fast changes in business circumstances, company should get the right information to implement SCM appropriately. For successful SCM, firms should understand the supplier development maturity formation and ERP activating diffusion. Second, supplier development factor has significant effects on supplier development maturity. Third, mediator such as supplier development maturity significantly affects ERP activating diffusion. Finally, ERP activating diffusion has significant impacts on SCM performance. This study makes a meaningful contribution to further appreciation on how supplier development maturity formation affects SCM performance. This study shows implications. First, there would not have been dealt with introducing the concept of supplier development maturity. Second, through empirical analysis and provider factors, the providers will develop the maturity that affect interactive factors between purchaser and supplier.

keywords
Supplier Development, ERP, Knowledge Transfer, Supply Chain, Distribution Science

Reference

1.

Ann, Young-Jin (2007). Change & innovation. Seoul, Korea:Pakyoungsa.

2.

Beecham, S., Hall, T., & Rainer, A. (2003). Software Process Improvement Problems in Twelve Software Companies:an Empirical Analysis. Empirical Software Engineering, 8, 7-42.

3.

Bennett, D., & O’Kane, J. (2006). Achieving business excellence through synchronous supply in the automotive sector. Benchmarking, 13, 12-22.

4.

Bensaou, M. (1999). Portfolios of Buyer-Supplier Relationships. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 35-44.

5.

Choi, Jong-Yeol, Chen, Xuexue, & Song, Yun-Hee (2014). A Study On the Meditating role of ERP Utilization Level in the Automotive Parts Suppliers. Journal of Industrial Economic and Business, 27(6), 2837-2862.

6.

Choi, Soon-Gwon, & Lee, Joong-Woo (2004). A Study of Knowledge Transfer within International Joint Venture Knowledge Translation Perspective Approach. International Business Journal, 15(4), 1-30.

7.

Choi, Su-Jeong, & Ko, Il-sang (2006). The Influence of Relationship-specificity of Invested Assets on Electronic Collaboration and Firm’s Performance in Small and Medium Enterprises. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 121-149.

8.

Chu, S. Y., & Fang, W. C. (2006). Exploring the relationships of trust and commitment in supply chain management. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 9, 224-228.

9.

Collins, J., & Porras, J. I. (1994). Bulid to Last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: Harper Collins Business.

10.

Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

11.

Delios, A., & Eeamish, P. (2001). Survival profitability: The Roles of Experience and Intangible Assets in Foreign Subsidiary Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1028-1038.

12.

Dyer, J. H., (1997). Effective Inter-firm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction cost and Maximize Transaction Value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 535-556.

13.

Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and Managing High Performance Knowledge Sharing Networks: The Toyota Case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-368.

14.

Gimenez, C., & Ventura, E. (2005). Logistics production, logistics-marketing and external integration, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(1), 20-38.

15.

Hong, Hyun-Gi (2012). The Effect of ERP System’s Maturity on the Implementation of SCM System. Journal of Digital Policy, 10(5), 131-141.

16.

Hong, Kwan-Soo, & Zhang, Ping (2009). Antecedents, Knowledge Change Speed, and Performance in Knowledge Transfer Activities for Supplier Development. Management Science, 26(2), 113-134.

17.

Huggett, J. F. (1999). When culture resists change: Getting your employees aligned with your strategy. Quality Progress, 32(3), 35-39.

18.

Huy, Q. N. (2001). Time, temporal capability and planned change. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 605-623.

19.

Jang, Kyung-Seo, Suh, Kil-Soo, & Lee, Moon-Bong (2000). Exploratory Study on Key Success Factors for ERP Systems Implementation. Information Systems Review, 2(2), 255-282.

20.

Jiang, J. J., Muhanna, W. A., & Klein, G. (2000). User Resistance and Strategies for Promoting Acceptance across System Types. Information and Management, 37(1), 25-36.

21.

Johnston, D. A., McCutcheon, D. M., Stuart, F. I., & Kerwood, H. (2004). Effects of Supplier Trust on Performance of Cooperative Supplier Relationships. Journal of operations Management, 22(1), 23-38.

22.

Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance Capability, Stock Market Response, and Long-Term Alliance Success: The Role of the Alliance Function. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 747-767.

23.

Kang, In-Won, Choi, Ji-Ho, & Lee, Sang-Jai (2005). ERP Implementation by Small to Medium Sized Firms:Antecedents and Consequences. The Korean Association of Small Business Studies, 27(1), 3-29.

24.

Kim, Byung-Gon, & Oh, Jay-In (2002). Factors Influencing the Successful Implementation of the ERP System. The journal of MIS research, 12(2), 137-162.

25.

Kim, Chul-Soo, & Seo, Chang-Soo (2006). The Mediation Effect of Collaboration on Supply Chain Performance: Mobile Networks Industry in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Information System, 16(3), 1-27

26.

Kim, Jin-Han, & Park, Jin-Han (2012). The Performance of Supplier Development Program and Role of Communication: A Supplier Perspective, Journal of the Korean Production & Operations Management Society, 23(2), 127-153.

27.

Kim, Min, & Lee, Myung-Jin (2004). ASP Vendor Attributes that Affect ASP Client Satisfaction. Journal of Information Technology Application & Management, 11(2), 65-81.

28.

Krause, D. R. (1999). The Antecedents of Buying Firm’s Efforts to Improve Suppliers. Journal of Operation Management, 24(2), 205-224.

29.

Lee, Jang-Rho, Jeong, In-Sik, Park, Ji-Hoon, & Na, Woo-He (2006). An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Korean Firms Marketing Knowledge Transfer to Subsidiaries in China. Korean Academy of International Business, 17(3), 23-56.

30.

Lee, Sang-Myeong (2014). The Impact of Introduction Factors of ERP System on Introduction Decision and Management Performance. Korea International Accounting Association, 53, 38-62.

31.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.

32.

Mentzer, J. T., Foggin, J. H., & Golicic, S. L. (2000). Collaboration: The Enablers, Impediments, and Benefits. Supply Chain Management Review, 4(4), 52-58.

33.

Moberg, C., Culter, B., Gross, A., & Speh, T. (2002). Identifying antecedents of information exchange within supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 32(9), 755-770.

34.

Modi, S. B., & Mabert, V. A. (2007). Supplier Management:Improving Supplier Performance Through Knowledge Management. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 42-64.

35.

Moon, Tae-Soo, & Kang, Jae-Jung (2007). Influence Factors on Successful Implementation of ERP systems and the Moderating Effect of IS Maturity. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 7(4), 263-284.

36.

Nachira, F. (2002). Towards a Network of Digital Business Ecosystems Fostering the Local Development. European Commission Discussion Paper, Bruxelles, Belgium: FN. Retrieved September 30, 2002, from http://www.digital -ecosystems.org/doc/discussionpaper.pdf

37.

Nam, K., Rajagopalan, S., Rao, & Chaudhury, H. (1996). A Two-Level Investigation of nformation Systems Outsourcing. Communication of ACM, 39(7), 36-44.

38.

Nolan, R. L. (1973). Managing Computer Resources: A Stage Hypothesis. Communications of the ACM, 16(7), 399-405.

39.

Park, Kwang-Ho (2007). Determinants of ERP Usage in Suppliers of a Collaborative Informatization Project: A Samsung Electronics Case. Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 30(3), 71-81.

40.

Rainer, A., & Hall, T. (2002). Key Success Factors for Implementing Software Process Improvement: a Maturity based Analysis. The Journal of Systems and Software, 62, 71-84.

41.

Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. (1992). Structuring Cooperative Relationships Between Organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 83-98.

42.

Sako, M. (2004). Supplier development at Honda, Nissan and Toyota: Comparison Case Studies of Organizational Capability Enhancement. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(2), 281-308.

43.

Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2002). The Collaborative Supply Chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), 15–30.

44.

Sheu, Chwen, Yen, Hsiuju Rebecca, & Chae, Bongsug (2006). Determinants of supplier-retailer collaboration: evidence from an international study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(1), 24-49.

45.

Song, Jang-Gwen, & Kim, Gwang-Suk (2010). The Effect of Information Sharing on ERP Implementation: On the Basis of a Automobile Firm Case. The Journal of Industrial Innovation, 26(4), 147-173.

46.

Song, Jang-Gwen, Kim, Gwang-Suk, Son, Lim-Soo, & Lee, Chul-Sik (2009). Information Sharing as a Competitive Strategy of Logistics and Supply Chain: Performance Formation Model of Supplier Development Project. Journal of the Korean Society of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 89-98.

47.

Song, Jang-Gwen, & Oh, Se-Gu (2014). Study on the Integrated SCM Performance Formation Model through Supplier Development Project and Asset Specificity. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(10), 85-97.

48.

Song, Sin-Geun, Son, Mi-Sun, & Lee, Eun-Ah (2009). The Effects of the Diffusion of ERP System on Management Control Systems Changes. Journal of Industrial Economic and Business, 22(1), 83-104.

49.

Song, Sun-Geun, & Chang, Hyun-Nam (2008). An Empirical Study on the Successful Diffusion of BSC. Korean Journal of Management Accounting Research, 8(1), 39-66.

50.

Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., & Daugherty, P. J. (2001). Supply Chain Collaboration and Logistical Service Performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(1), 29-48.

51.

Suh, In-Won, Kwahk, Kee-Young, & Kim, Young-Gul (1998). A Contingency Approach for Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Systems. Korean Management Science Review, 15(2), 19-32.

52.

Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361-386.

53.

Youn, Myoung-Kil, & Kim, Yoo-Oh (2007). A Study on the Methodology of Distribution Study in Korea. Journal of Distribution Science, 5(1), 75-88.

54.

Yun, Young-Sun, & Lee, Kook-Yong (2004). A Study about the Successful Diffusion of Supply Chain Management. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 17(1), 55-77.

55.

Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159.

56.

Zsidisin, G. A., Ellram, L. M., & Ogden, J. A. (2003). The Relationship Between Purchasing and Supply Management’s Perceived Value and Participation in Strategic Supplier Cost management activities. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(2), 129-154.

The Journal of Distribution Science