바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Role Clarity and Organizational Commitment in Food Manufacturing and Distribution Firms: The Mediating Role of Creativity

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2017, v.15 no.1, pp.115-121
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.1.201701.115
Lee, Woo-Joo
Lee, Jong-Keon
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Although ensuring that all the organizational members know their roles exactly is an important part of managerial work, few studies address the role clarity in food manufacturing and distribution firms. Role clarity refers to the extent to which individuals clearly understand the tasks, duties, responsibilities, and expectations of their work roles (Hinkin & Schriesheim, 2008). The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of the role clarity on organizational commitment and the mediating role of creativity in the role clarity-organizational commitment relationship. Research design, data, and methodology - Data were collected from 297 employees in food manufacturing and distribution firms of Korea by self-evaluations questionnaires. The unit of the analysis for testing is an individual. We proposed four hypotheses: (1) <Hypothesis 1> is about the relationship between role clarity and organizational commitment, (2) <Hypothesis 2> is about the relationship between role clarity and creativity, (3) <Hypothesis 3> is about the relationship between creativity and organizational commitment, and (4) <Hypothesis 4> is about the mediating role of creativity. We conducted the hierarchical regression analysis for testing the main and mediating effects. Results - The results of the study indicated that the role clarity was positively associated with organizational commitment and creativity. Results also indicated that the creativity was positively associated with organizational commitment. Especially, the impact of the role clarity on organizational commitment was mediated by creativity. Conclusions - An important contribution of this study is extending prior theory on the relationship between role clarity and organizational commitment by shedding new light on assumptions regarding the mediating effect of creativity. The results demonstrate that the role clarity has an indirect effect as well as a direct effects on organizational commitment. Our research suggests important implications for organizations that pursue to stimulate their employees' creativity, emphasizing the importance of the role clarity. This study has several potential limitations. Maybe the most serious limitation is its cross-sectional study design. Another limitation is the use of employees' self-reports to measure the variables. In the future, researchers should employ a longitudinal study design and use diverse sources of data.

keywords
Role Clarity, Creativity, Organizational Commitment

Reference

1.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity:A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 45(2), 357-377.

2.

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.

3.

Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Wilson, D. C. (2007). Engaging the aging workforce: The relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with coworkers, and employee engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1542–1556.

4.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

5.

Bateman, T. S., & Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 95-112.

6.

Cable, D., & Judge, T. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317–348.

7.

Choi, S. B., Tran, T. B. H., & Park, B. L. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: Mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior & Personality, 43(6), 931-944.

8.

Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 19-33.

9.

Eatough, E. M., Chang, C.-H., Miloslavic, S. A., & Johnson, R. E. (2011). Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 619–32.

10.

George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524.

11.

Hall, M. (2008). The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2-3), 141-163.

12.

Hausknecht, J. P., Hiller, N. J., & Vance, R. J. (2008). Work-unit absenteeism: Effects of satisfaction, commitment, labor market conditions, and time. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1223-1245.

13.

Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2008). An examination of “nonleadership”: From laissez-faire leadership to leader reward omission and punishment omission. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1234-1248.

14.

Hunter, L. W., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2007). Feeling the heat: Effects of stress, commitment, and job experience on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 953-968.

15.

John, R. R., & Robert, J. (1965). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. The Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150-163.

16.

Karim, S. A., & Sarfraz, S. U. (2016). Creativity is everyone’s business: How to enhance employee creativity in telecommunication sector. Economic Science Series, 15(1), 515-524.

17.

Lambert, E. G., & Hogan, N. L. (2009). The importance of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in shaping turnover intent: A test of a causal model. Criminal Justice Review, 27(1), 35-52.

18.

Lambert, E. G., Kelley, T., & Hogan, N. L. (2013). The association of occupational stressors with different forms of organizational commitment among correctional staff. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 480-501.

19.

Lejonberg, E., & Christophersen, K.-A. (2015). Schoolbased mentors’ affective commitment to the mentor role: Role clarity, self-efficacy, mentor education and mentor experience as antecedents. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 13(2), 45-63.

20.

Lynn, G. S., Kalay, F. (2016). The effect of vision and role clarity on team performance. International Journal of Economic & Administrative Studies. 17, 175-196.

21.

Mayer, K., Somaya, D., & Williamson, I. (2012). Firm-specific, industry-specific and occupational human capital, and the sourcing of knowledge work. Organization Science, 23, 1311–1329.

22.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.

23.

Morrow, P., & McElroy, J. (1986). On assessing measures of work commitment. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 7, 139–145.

24.

Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247.

25.

Mukherjee, A., & Malhotra, N. (2006). Does role clarity explain employee-perceived service quality?: A study of antecedents and consequences in call centres. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(5), 444-473.

26.

Ortqvist, D., & Wincent, J. (2006). Prominent consequences of role stress: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 399–422.

27.

Porter, L. W., Crampon, W. J., & Smith, F. J. (1976). Organizational commitment and managerial turnover:A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 15(1), 87-98.

28.

Robinson, A. G., & Stern, S. (1997). Corporate creativity. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler publisher.

29.

Sakires, J., Doherty, A., & Misener, K. (2009). Role ambiguity in voluntary sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 23, 615-643.

30.

Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 703-714.

31.

Slattery, J. P., Selvarajan, T. T., & Anderson, J. E. (2008). The influences of new employee development practices upon role stressors and work-related attitudes of temporary employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 2268–2293.

32.

Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 555-577.

33.

Tao, M., Takagi, H., Ishida, M., & Masuda, K. (1998). A study of antecedents of organizational commitment. Japanese Psychological Research, 40(4), 198-205.

34.

Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity:The relevance of traits and relationship. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591-620.

35.

Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590–607.

36.

van Knippenberg, D., & van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137–147.

37.

Vincent, L. C., & Kouchaki, M. (2016), Creative, rare, entitled, and dishonest: How commonality of creativity in one’s group decrease an individual’s entitlement and dishonesty. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1451-1473.

38.

Wong, S.-S., DeSanctis, G., & Staudenmayer, N. (2007). The relationship between task interdependency and role stress: A revisit of the job demands–control model. Journal of Management Studies, 44(2), 284–303.

The Journal of Distribution Science