바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Gap: A Study on the Influence of New Measurement Method on Consumers’ Decision Making

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2017, v.15 no.1, pp.51-56
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.1.201701.51
Yang, Hoe-Chang
Cho, Hee-Young
Kim, Young-Ei
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - The study verified the effects of consumers' knowledge perception upon word-of-mouth intention and purchase intention of consumers who were exposed to a lot of information, and examined consumer's behavior from multi-dimensional points of view. Research design, data, and methodology - The study conducted the test of difference between consumer's cognition on importance and satisfaction of HMR product by gap of HMR (Home Meal Replacement) product for IPA analysis. The consumer's reliability and words-of-mouth were measured by the questionnaire method with 4 questions according to Likert 7-point scale. Conversion into z-score removed the difference of variables. Results - The causal relation model for importance, satisfaction and gap, not relying upon multi-dimensional scaling and others, could construct causal relation model to give implications. Difference (d) of the products could lessen consumer's reliability to increase consumer's knowledge perception, word-of-mouth intention, knowledge perception, and purchase intention. Therefore, enterprises should make an effort to lessen consumers' complaint for the products and to elevate consumers' reliability. Enterprises also try to give consumers exact information and to promote purchase intention. Conclusions - Difference (d) of consumers' complaint and/or disappointment decreased consumers' reliability to increase knowledge perception. Enterprises should supply consumers with products according to their requirements to minimize the gap and to give them proper information.

keywords
Measuring Gap, Trust, Knowledge Perception, Word-of-mouth Intention, Purchase Intention

Reference

1.

Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42-58.

2.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual Strategic and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

3.

Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H (1987). Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350-362.

4.

Burton, S., Biswas, A., & Netemeyer, R. (1994). Effects of Alternative Nutrition Label Formats and Nutrition Reference Information on Consumer Perception, Comprehension and Product Evaluation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13(1), 36-47.

5.

Castaldo, S., Premazzi, K., & Zerbini, F. (2010). The Meaning(s) of Trust. A Content Analysis on the Diverse Conceptualizations of Trust in Scholarly Research on Business Relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 657-668.

6.

Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty. Journal of marketing, 65(2), 81-93.

7.

Chen, S. C., & Dhillon, G. S. (2003). Interpreting Dimensions of Consumer Trust in E-Commerce. Information Technology and Management, 4(2-3), 303-318.

8.

Chipman, H., Kendall, P., Auld, G., Slater, M., & Keefe, T. (1995). Consumer Reaction to Risk/Benefit/Option Massage About Agricultural Chemicals in Food Supply. The Journal of Comsumer Affairs, 29(1), 144-163.

9.

Dulany, D. E. (1968), Awareness, Rules and Propositional Control: A Confrontation with S-R Behavior Theory, In T. Dixon & D. Horton (eds.). Verbal Behavior and General Behavior Theory (pp. 340-387). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

10.

Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer Behavior (8th ed.). Forth Worth, TX:Dryden.

11.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

12.

Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: the Role of Familiarity and Trust. Omega, 28(6), 725-737.

13.

Gremler, D. D., Kevin, P. G., & Brown, S. W. (2001). Generating Positive Word-of-mouth Communication through Customer-employee Relationships. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(1), 44-59.

14.

Grönroos, C. (1984). A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implication. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36-44.

15.

Ha, Hwan-Ho, & Lee, Yeoung-Il (2011). The Effects on Purchase Deferral of Choice Difficulty and Anticipated Regret on Assortment Size of Product. Journal of Product Research, 29(6), 1-10.

16.

Howard, D., & Madrigal, R. (1990). Who Makes the Decision: The Parent or Child. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(3), 244-258.

17.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

18.

Lee, Hak-Sik., An, Kwang-Ho., & Ha, Young-Won (1999). Consumer Behavior. Seoul: Parkyoungsa.

19.

McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.

20.

Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81-101.

21.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.

22.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.

23.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1988), SERVQUAL: A Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.

24.

Park, Kyung-Sook, Choi, Beet-Na, & Lee, Choon-Ho (2016). Effects of the Recognition for the Importance Properties of Food on Satisfaction and Purchasing Intention: Path Analysis of Consumers Shopping Tendency for HMR. Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 19(5), 15-24.

25.

Park, Kyung-Sook, Kim, Jong-Baek, & Yang, Hoe-Chang (2015). Food and Nutrition Students' Evaluation for Home Meal Replacement Quality Using Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Distribution Management, 13(7), 19-24.

26.

Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative Word of Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumer: A Pilot Study. Journal of Marketing, 47(Winter), 68-78.

27.

Russo, J., Staeling, R., Nolan, C. A., Russel, G A., & Metcalf, B. L. (1986). Nutrition Information in the Supermarket. Journal of Comsumer Research, 13(June), 48-70.

28.

Salo, J., & Karjaluoto, H. (2007). A Conceptual Model of Trust in the Online Environment. Online Information Review, 31(5), 604-621.

29.

Sam, M. F. M., & Tahir, M. N. H. (2010). Website Quality and Consumer Online Purchase Intention of Air Ticket. International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 9(10), 20-25.

30.

Schwartz, B. (2005). The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

31.

Suh, Ji-Yeon, & Lee, Hyung-Ju (2011). A study on the Coffee Shop’s Service Quality Impacts on the Customer’s Satisfaction, Trust and Recommend Convention: Comparison of Homemade and Foreign Coffee Shop Brands. Academy of Customer Satisfaction Management, 13(3), 151-172.

32.

Wells, W., Burnett, J., & Moriarty, S. (1995). Advertising:Principles and practice (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

33.

Yang, Hoe-Chang (2014). Revisiting Self-enhancement Bias and Transformational Leadership Using the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(9), 83-93.

34.

Yang, Hoe-Chang, Kim, Jong-Baek, & Kim, An-Sik (2016). Different Perception on Product Attributes of HMR:Focusing on College Students and Consumers. Journal of Distribution Management, 24(2), 44-55.

35.

Yang, Hoe-Chang., Yang, Woo-Reong., & Lee, Choon-Ho (2016). Influence of Organizational Exchange Relationship on Motivation: Mediating Effect of Positive Psychological Capital and Self-enhancement Bias. Information, 19(4), 1175-1180.

The Journal of Distribution Science