바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Does SNS as an Information Channel Improve SNS Users’ Happiness?

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2017, v.15 no.11, pp.31-39
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.11.201711.31
Choi, Ji-Eun
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This research aims to examine the influence of social capital formed on SNS on SNS users' life satisfaction. This research divides social capital into bridging and bonding social capital based on Social Capital Theory and suggests that each type of social capital will have a positive impact on SNS users' life satisfaction. In addition, this research suggests the self-construal of SNS users as a moderating variable based on Self-Construal Theory. Research design, data, and methodology - To test the hypotheses presented, an online survey was conducted with adult participants. An online research company was hired to conduct an online survey; survey participants were volunteer adult participants residing in Korea. And data was analyzed using SPSS. Results - Analysis results showed that the impact of bonding social capital on life satisfaction was not statistically different between SNS users of differing self-construals(independent vs. interdependent self-construal). However, this study also determined that the impact of bridging social capital on life satisfaction was greater for SNS users with an interdependent self-construal as opposed to those with an independent self-construal. Conclusions - The results of this study expand the scope of available research on social capital formed on SNS and provide practical implications for SNS providers.

keywords
SNS as an Information Channel, Social Capital, Self-Construal, Life Satisfaction

Reference

1.

Agrawal, N., & Maheswaran, D. (2005). The effects of selfconstrual and commitment on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 841-849.

2.

Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.

3.

Appel, L., Dadlani, P., Dwyer, M., Hampton, K., Kitzie, V., Matni, Z. A., & Teodoro, R. (2014). Testing the validity of social capital measures in the study of information and communication technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 398-416.

4.

Basak, E., & Calisir, F. (2015). An empirical study on factors affecting continuance intention of using Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 181-189.

5.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.

6.

Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp.241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood.

7.

Chen, J. S. (2012). Advances in hospitality and leisure. Vol. 8. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

8.

Choi, G., & Chung, H. (2013). Applying the technology acceptance model to social networking sites (SNS):Impact of subjective norm and social capital on the acceptance of SNS. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 29, 619-628.

9.

Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M. (1999). Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1242-1253.

10.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.

11.

Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.

12.

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403-425.

13.

Duclos, R., & Barasch, A. (2014). Prosocial behavior in intergroup relations: how donor self-construal and recipient group-membership shape generosity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 93-108.

14.

Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Steinfield, C., & Vitak, J. (2010). How social network sites affect social capital processes. In Z. A. Papacharissi (Eds.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. New York, NY: Routledge.

15.

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.

16.

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebookenabled communication practices. New Media &Society, 27, 1-20.

17.

Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites:Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855-870.

18.

Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 153-160.

19.

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

20.

Glass, R., Li, S., & Pan, R. (2014). Personality, problematic social network use and academic performance in China. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54, 88-96.

21.

Hamburger, Y. A., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289-1295.

22.

Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 276-297.

23.

Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. L. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices on social network sites. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 515-536.

24.

Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions:A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13(1-2), 46-74.

25.

Im, D. (2011). Facebook friendship and online mobilization. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 25, 171-201.

26.

Ji, Y. G., Hwangbo, H., Yi, J. S., Rau, P. P., Fang, X., & Ling, C. (2010). The influence of cultural differences on the use of social network services and the formation of social capital. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26(11-12), 1100-1121.

27.

Kramer, T., Spolter-Weisfeld, S., & Thakkar, M. (2007). The effect of cultural orientation on consumer responses to personalization. Marketing Science, 26(2), 246-258.

28.

Lalwani, A. K., & Shavitt, S. (2009). The “me” I claim to be: Cultural self-construal elicits self-presentational goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 88-102.

29.

Lampe, C., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Ellison, N. (2012). Perceptions of Facebook’s value as an information source. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, Texas, May, 5-10. Lin 2001.

30.

Lee, G. R., & Ishii-Kuntz, M. (1987). Social interaction, loneliness, and emotional well-being among the elderly. Research on Aging, 9(4), 459-482.

31.

Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Liu, H. (2007). Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 252-275.

33.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.

34.

Orchard, L. J., & Fullwood, C. (2010). Current perspectives on personality and Internet use. Social Science Computer Review, 28(2), 155-169.

35.

Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1-24.

36.

Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.

37.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141-166.

38.

Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 971-980.

39.

Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580-591.

40.

Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531-549.

41.

Trepte, S., & Scharkow, M. (2016). How Social Capital and Social Support Received in Media Environments Contribute to Well-Being. The Routledge Handbook of Media Use and Well-Being: International Perspectives on Theory and Research on Positive Media Effects, 304-316.

42.

Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28, 20-36.

43.

Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.

44.

Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do Social Network Sites Enhance or Undermine Subjective Well-Being? A Critical Review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274-302.

45.

Williams, D. (2006). On and off the Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593-628.

The Journal of Distribution Science