바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibilities and Financial Reporting Quality: Focusing on Distribution & Service Companies

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2018, v.16 no.10, pp.77-82
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.16.10.201810.77
Chae, Soo-Joon
Ryu, Hae-Young

Abstract

Purpose - This paper examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial reporting quality. Corporate social responsibility is a way for firms to take responsibility for the social and environmental impacts of their business operations. Corporate social responsibility is a broad concept that can take various forms depending on the firm and industry. Through corporate social responsibility programs, firms can benefit society. At the same time, firms improve their reputations by increasing engagement in corporate social responsibility activities. However, corporate social responsibility activities are not directly related to profitability, especially for distribution firms. Research design, data, and methodology - 229 distribution & service firm-years between 2011 and 2016 are used for the main analysis. In Korea, Korean Economic Justice Institute evaluates the ethical performance of Korean firms, and the institute annually discloses the scores of top firms. This study uses the KEJI Index scores to measure firm-level corporate social responsibility activities. Discretionary accruals are used as a proxy for financial reporting quality. Discretionary accruals can be used opportunistically, and thus distort the information in earnings. We extract financial data from the KIS Value database. Results - We find that distribution & service firms' engagement in corporate social responsibilities is positively related to their financial reporting quality. First, there is a negative correlation between implementation of corporate social responsibility activities and discretionary accruals. In addition, we find that the coefficient of CSR is significantly negative, supporting our prediction. The result is significant at the 1% level. Conclusions - We examine the relationship between corporate social responsibility activities of distribution firms and their financial reporting quality while most prior studies examine the engagement in corporate social responsibility activities of manufacturing firms. The results of this study show that distribution & service firms engaging in corporate social responsibility activities are likely to maintain high-quality financial reporting.

keywords
Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Reporting Quality

Reference

1.

Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97-116.

2.

Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2004). The role of purchasing on corporate social responsibility: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 145-186.

3.

Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70, 193-225.

4.

Diamond, D., & Verrecchia, R. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 66, 1325-1355.

5.

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 388-2406.

6.

Hahn, Y., & Kim, D. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: A comparison analysis. The East Asian Journal of Business Management, 6(4), 13-17.

7.

Hart, D. (2005). Adding identity to the moral domain. Human Development, 48(4), 257-261.

8.

Heal, G. (2005). The Geneva papers on risk and insurance. Issues and Practice, 30(3), 387-409.

9.

Jeon, H. J., & Kim, Y. M. (2018). CSR activity on firm value and management performance of distribution firms. Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 21(1), 31-40.

10.

Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 193-228.

11.

Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.

12.

Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Customer satisfaction and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18.

13.

Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance:Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817–835.

14.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: Correlation or misspecification. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603-609.

15.

Paricheh, M., Mehrazeen, A., & Shiri, M. M. (2013). The amount of earnings per share’s adjustment and earnings management. The International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 4(1), 15-21.

16.

Pava, M. L., & Krauz, J. (1996). The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance:The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 321-357.

17.

Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust:The case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 3-12.

18.

Renneboog, L., Horst, J. T., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742.

19.

Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243.

20.

Yang, H. C., & Kim, Y. E. (2018). The effects of corporate social responsibility on job performance:Moderating effects of authentic leadership and meaningfulness of work. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(3), 121-132.

The Journal of Distribution Science