바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Impact of Sales Revenue on Value Relevance in the Distribution Corporate

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2018, v.16 no.2, pp.83-88
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.16.2.201802.83
Kim, Jin-Hoe
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - For distribution corporate, the method of recognizing sales revenue may be different depending on the type of distribution transaction. Until the change in accounting standards for revenue recognition was made in 2002, the distribution corporate recognized the full amount of sales of goods regardless of the type of transaction. However, in accordance with accounting standards for revenue recognition, which began to be applied in 2003, distribution corporate differ in sales revenue recognition by transaction type. The Purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of sales revenue on the corporate value after the change of the revenue recognition accounting standards. Research design, data, and methodology - We selected a comprehensive wholesale and retail corporate listed on Korea Exchange. The research model extends the Ohlson(1995) model and regresses whether sales revenue affecting the corporate value is discriminatory value relevance between the corporate affected by changes in accounting standards for revenue recognition and those not. Results - The results of the analysis are as follows. First, The average value of stock price, net asset per share, and earnings per share are all higher than those before the change of accounting standards for revenue recognition. However, the average value of sales per share is lower than that before the change of accounting standards for revenue recognition. Second, the relationship between corporate value and net asset per share, earnings per share and sales per share, the coefficient of net asset per share, earnings per share and sales per share are all statistically significant positive value. Therefore, in explaining corporate value, besides net asset per share and earnings per share, sales per share provides additional information. And the coefficient of interaction variable between accounting standard change and sales per share is a statistically significant positive value. This result indicating that after the change of the revenue recognition accounting standards the usefulness of sales revenue has increased. Conclusions - The change in accounting standards for revenue recognition led to a decrease in distribution corporate sales revenue but the higher the relevance of the corporate value of the sales revenue information. These results shows that the change of accounting standards that reflects the transaction type of retailers was a revision to increase the value relevance of sales revenue in valuation of corporate value.

keywords
Sales Revenue, Direct Purchases, Specific Purchases

Reference

1.

Brown, S., Lo, K., & Lys, T. (1999). Use of R2 in Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(2), 83-115.

2.

Caylor, M. L., Lopez, T. J., & Rees, L. (2007). Is the Value Relevance of Earnings Conditional on the Timing of Earnings Information?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(1), 62-95.

3.

Chandra, U., & Ro, B. T. (2008). The Role of Revenue in Firm Valuation. Accounting Horizons, 22(2), 199-222.

4.

Collins, D. W., Maydew, E. L., & Weiss, I. S. (1997). Changes in the Value-Relevance of Earnings and Book Values over the Past Forty Years. Journal of accounting and economics, 24(1), 39-67.

5.

Collins, D. W., Pincus, M., & Xie, H. (1999). Equity valuation and negative earnings: The role of book value of equity. The Accounting Review, 74(1), 29-61.

6.

Ertimur, Y., Livnat, J., & Martikainen, M. (2003). Differential Market Reactions to Revenue and Expense Surprises. Review of Accounting Studies, 8(2/3), 185-211.

7.

Francis, J., & Schipper, K. (1999). Have Financial Statements Lost Their Relevance?. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 319-352.

8.

Hayn, C. (1995). The Information Content of Losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(2), 125-153.

9.

Jegadeesh, N., & Livnat, J. (2006). Revenue Surprises and Stock Returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(1-2), 147-171.

10.

Keung, E. (2010). Do Supplementary Sales Forecasts Increase the Credibility of Financial Analysts’Earnings Forecasts?. Accounting Review, 85(6), 2047-2074.

11.

Kwon, D. H., & Park. J, H. (2015). The role of revenue in firm valuation. Korean Corporation Management Review, 22(6),151-165.

12.

Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687.

13.

Rees, L., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2007). The Effect of Meeting or Beating Revenue Forecasts on the Association between Quarterly Returns and Earnings Forecast Errors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(1), 259-290.

14.

Youn, M. K., & Namkung, S. (2005). A study on tukjeongmeip system of Department store in Korea. Journal of Distribution Science, 3(2), 1-14.

The Journal of Distribution Science