ISSN : 1738-3110
Purpose - Many retail stores tend to use scarcity-laden message in order to influence consumers, where scarcity refers to insufficiency of product supply or time of availability. For example, inside stores, the displayed products are often accompanied by scarcity message such as 'exclusive offer, limited time only.' According to past research, scarcity has a positive effect on product evaluation, since scarcity can acts as a signal of consumer demand, and thus product quality. Prior studies argue that consumers face a scarce product, they logically infer that other consumers buying the product in large numbers cause the scarcity. We propose that scarcity can be interpreted as a sales tactic artificially created by retail stores in order to increase sales of product. Research design, data, and methodology - We use a persuasion knowledge perspective framework to develop our hypotheses. In the present research, we show that product curation type is a key variable that moderates consumer response to scarcity, and thus the scarcity effect on product evaluation. Results - In this research, we showed when scarcity-laden message was used inside the store using consumer-centric curation message, scarcity had a positive effect on product evaluation. In contrast, when scarcity-laden message was used inside the store using marketer-centric curation message, the positive of scarcity message on product evaluation was diluted. Conclusions - Our study makes two important contributions to the literature on consumer response to scarcity. First, we identify a variable - namely, product curation type - that determines when either 'scarcity = good' or 'scarcity = marketing tactic' interpretation is likely to be dominant. Second, we cite persuasion knowledge perspective to explain the moderating function of product curation type in a retail store-related scarcity context. This research is relevant to practitioners, such as brand manager, retail environment manager, and advertising agencies, for the effective use for the scarcity-laden message in retail. The proposed moderator can operate in many real-life situations in retail where consumers are exposed to scarcity. And curation message related to scarcity has been facilitated by the inner-retail activities. These factors of the marketplace indicate that the boundary conditions of scarcity can have a significant effect on real-life consumer judgment.
Amaldoss, W., & Jain, S.(2005). Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 30-42.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A.(1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Brannon, L. A., & Brock, T. C.(2001). Limiting Time for Responding Enhances Behavior Corresponding to the Merits of Compliance Appeals: Reputations of Heuristic‐Cue Theory in Service and Consumer Settings. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 135-146.
Brown, C. L., & Krishna, A.(2004). The skeptical shopper:A metacognitive account for the effects of default options on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 529-539.
Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A.(2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69–83.
Cialdini, R. B.(2001). Influence: Science and Practice. Needham Heights. MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Darke, P. R., & Ritchie, R. J. B.(2007). The defensive consumer: Advertising deception, defensive processing, and distrust. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 114-127.
Friestad, M., & Wright, P.(1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31.
Inman, J. J., Peter, A. C., & Raghubir, P.(1997). Framing the deal: The role of restrictions in accentuating deal value. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 68-79.
Kim, G.(2013). A study on the effects of supersupermarket service quality on satisfaction in store selection. The International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 4(2), 41-49.
Kirmani, A., & Zhu, R.(2007). Vigilant against manipulation:The effect of regulatory focus on the use of persuasion knowledge. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 668-701.
Lee, S. Y., Oh, S., & Jung, S.(2014). The effects of scarcity appeal on product evaluation: Consumers’cognitive resources and company reputation. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(5), 743-756.
Lynn, M.(1989). Scarcity effects on desirability: Mediated by assumed expensiveness?. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(2), 257-274.
Park, J., & Chung, L.(2016). The effect of store selection attributes and consumption emotion on revisit intention to traditional market under retail regulation. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(6), 17-26.
Simonson, I.(1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 105-18.
Swami, S., & Khairnar, P. J.(2003). Diffusion of products with limited supply and known expiration date. Marketing Letters, 14(1), 33–46.
Van Herpen, E., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M.(2009). When demand accelerates demand: Trailing the bandwagon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 302-312.
Verhallen, T. M. M., & Robben, H. S. J.(1994). Scarcity and preference: An experiment on unavailability and product evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15(2), 315-331.
Wei, M., Fischer, E., & Main, K. J.(2008). An examination of the effects of activating persuasion knowledge on consumer response to brands engaging in covert marketing. Journal of Public Policy &Marketing, 27(1), 34-44.
Yang, H., Han, S., & Eom, K.(2013). Analysis of value pursuit discount store customers using means–end chain theory. Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 4(2), 31-40