바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

A Study on the Distribution Environment and Consumer Behavior of Smartphone

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2018, v.16 no.4, pp.67-74
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.16.4.201804.67
Kim, Min-Soo

Abstract

Purpose - Most of the amendments to the law on the improvement of the distribution structure of mobile communication terminal equipment, the fully self-sufficient system of terminals, and the separated disclosure system on the terminals are aimed at securing transparency of the distribution structure by eliminating or reducing handset subsidies. This study investigates what items are important for the purchase of mobile phones in various and rapidly changing mobile phone markets from the consumer's point of view and tries to make a strategic suggestion for future mobile distribution strategies. Research design, data, and methodology - The procedure of this study takes place in four steps. In step 1, only the SF type respondents selected for this study were extracted through MBTI analysis. In step 2, they were divided into three hierarchies for the AHP analysis and each element was arranged. In step 3, the AHP analysis was converted to a Fuzzy-AHP number using the trigonometric centroid method. This was to eliminate the ambiguity of the response by converting into a fuzzy number even if data consistency was maintained with CI value below 0.1. In step 4, the number of converted 2-layer and 3-layer was combined to derive the priority when the final handset is selected. Results - First, the highest importance among the four items in the second tier was the terminal function item, followed by brand, price, and design item. Second, in the third tier, the highest importance was level of after-sales service, followed by device price, processing speed, ease of use, usefulness, and rate system. Third, the arithmetic average of the determinant of the fuzzy function showed that processing speed, ease of use and usefulness in the function item, level of after-sales service in the brand item, and device price in the price item were the five most important factors among 16 choice factors. Conclusions - First, there will be a change in the consumption patterns of consumers who have compared distributors and dealers to purchase handsets with more subsidies. Second, it is highly likely that people will purchase new handsets only when they need to change their devices because they can not receive subsidies by switching phone brands any more.

keywords
Customer Attitudes, Fuzzy-AHP Analysis, SmartPhone Distribution

Reference

1.

Bojei, J. H., & Hoo, W. C. (2012). Brand Equity and Current Use as the New Horizon for Repurchase Intention of Smartphone. International Journal of Business and Society, 13(1), 33-48.

2.

Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.

3.

Cho, K. T., Cho, Y. G., & Kang, H. S. (2005). The Analytic Hierarchy Process (2nd ed.). Seoul, Korea:Donghyeon Publishing.

4.

Choi, B. N., & Yang, H. C. (2018). A Study on Revitalization of Revenue through Difference of Consumer Perception of Characteristics of Mobile Social Commerce. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 8(1), 31-38.

5.

Choi, N. H., Park, S. M., & Lim. A. Y. (2018). Roles of Consumer’s Social Relationship and Perceived Justice Type on Service Recovery Satisfaction. The International Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 9(1), 77-88.

6.

Cinar, G., Isin, F., & Hushmat, A. (2016). How Managers React to Crisis?: A Planned Behavior Theory Approach. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 6(4), 5-12.

7.

Ganesan, P., & Sridhar, M. (2014). Smart Phone Attribute Choice and Brand Importance for Millennial Customers. Journal of Contemporary Management Research, 8(2), 71-89.

8.

Hwang, S., & Suh, E. K. (2018). An Empirical Study on Nonlinear Relationship between Product Modularity and Customer Satisfaction. The International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(2), 47-55.

9.

Kang, J. E., & Kim, D. G. (2011). A Study on the Determinant Factors for Continuous Use of Smartphone. e-Business Studies, 12(3), 27-47.

10.

Kim, J. J., Ku, H. J., & Youn, M. K. (2015). An Analysis on the Purchasing Behavior of the User through the Characteristics of Social Commerce. East Asian Journal of Business Economics, 3(4), 5-8.

11.

Kwak, K. T., Hwang, J. S., & Choi, S. K. (2011). Impact of Smartphone Quality on User Loyalty and the Moderating Effect of User Motivation. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 25(6), 7-51.

12.

Lee, J. S., & Ryu, J. Y. (2002). A study on the relationship between psychological type and factors of job satisfaction. Journal of the Korea Academy of Psychological Type, 9(1), 31-48.

13.

Mokalles, M. M. (2015). Buying Behavioral Pattern Regarding Smartphone Users. International Journal on Customer Relations, 3(2), 32-37.

14.

Pandey, M., & Nakra, N. (2014). Consumer Preference Towards Smartphone Brands, with Special Reference to Android Operating System. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(4), 7-22.

15.

Thour, M. T. Y., Doraisarmy, B., & Appanan, S. (2014). An Investigation of the Factors Affecting Consumer Decision Making of Smartphone in Kedah, Malaysia. Global Management Journal for Academic &Corporate Studies, 4(2), 147-155.

16.

Tsai, J. P., & Ho, C. F. (2013). Does design matter? Affordance perspective on smartphone usage. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(9), 1248-1269.

17.

Yang, H. C., & Cho, H. Y. (2015). Effects of Individuals, Leader Relationships, and Groups on Innovative Work Behaviors. Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 6(3), 19-25.

The Journal of Distribution Science