바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Contemporary Global Environment and Future Directions for KODISA

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.1, pp.7-9
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.1.201901.7
Kim, Dongho
Youn, Myoung-Kil

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to briefly review the contemporary global environment to suggest and develop appropriate strategies for KODISA and its journals. Research design, data, and methodology - This is an analytical case study that examines KODISA and its journals and the contemporary environment to demonstrate the importance of developing the future goals. Results - The analysis indicates that KODISA and its journals must decide whether to follow same footsteps of many reputable and big academic associations and journals or to start focusing more on the welfare of the public as an academic institution. Researches and scholarly works should be shared with everyone, and practicality and relevancy of researches should be valued and applied for the general welfare. Conclusions - Based on the progress and current success of KODISA and its journals, their goals should not be limited to just becoming a world renown academic association or journals. Promoting the welfare of the public through researches and scholarly activities should be their ultimate goal as an academic institution and journals. Attracting more practitioners and producing more researches that are practical and applicable to the public would be the first step while maintaining the quality and rigor of their academic and scholarly activities, which include publication practices.

keywords
KODISA, Publication Ethics, Global Environment, Academic Association

Reference

1.

Blinder, A. (2016, December 28). The American Public Against Trump. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-economic-positions-unpopular-by-alan-s--blinder-2016-12.

2.

Bourguignon, F. (2015). The Globalization of Inequality. (Scott-Railton, T. Trans.) Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

3.

Daniels, J. D., Radebaugh, L. H., & Sullivan, D. P. (2018). International Business: Environments and Operations (16thed.). NewYork, NY: Pearson.

4.

Hwang, H., Lee, J., Kim, D., Shin, D., Kim, B., Kim, T., Lee, Y., Kim W., & Youn, M. (2017). Cases of ethical violation in research publications: Through editorial decision-making process. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(5), 49-52.

5.

Hwang, H., Kim, B., Youn, M., Kim, W., Lee, J., Kim, T., Lee, Y., Kim, D., Shin, D., & Lee, J. (2017). Future development strategies for KODISA journals: Overview of 2016 and strategic plans for the future. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(5), 75-83.

6.

Hwang, H., Lee, J., Lee, J., Kim, Y., Yang, H., Youn, M., & Kim, D. (2015). Strengthening publication ethics for KODISA journals: Learning from the cases of plagiarism. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(4), 5-8.

7.

Posta, D, P., & Rehman, S. S. (2017). Brexit: Origins and Future Perspectives. In: Da Costa Cabral N., Renato Gonçalves J., Cunha Rodrigues N. (eds), After Brexit. New York, NY: Springer.

8.

Youn, M., Kim, D., Lee, J., Lee, J. H., & Hwang, H. (2014). Strategic approaches to solid ranking international journals: KODISA journals. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(6), 5-13.

9.

Youn, M., Lee, J., Kim, Y., Yang, H., Hwang, H., Kim, D., & Lee, J. (2015). KODISA journals and strategies. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(3), 5-10.

The Journal of Distribution Science