바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Sports Celebrities as a Determinant of Sport Media Distribution Contents: Focusing on Tacit Premise of Agenda Setting Theory

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.10, pp.83-91
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.10.201910.83
YOO, Sang-Keon
KIM, Yong-Eun
SEO, Won-Jae
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Media is a significant distributional channel in sport. In terms of determining the influencer in building sport media contents, recent sport media studies have employed agenda-setting theory, assuming media itself as the agenda provider. In a real-world situation, however, sports stars have been deemed key factor determining distribution contents in sport. The starting point of this study is the "tacit premise" of agenda-setting theory. Given the agenda-setting theory, the current study attempted to explore the function of sport stars as an agenda provider, which is a key determinant of sport distribution. Research design, data, and methodology - This study has reviewed articles of Yuna Kim, Sang-hwa Lee, and Hyun-jin Ryu from daily newspapers including as dong-a ilbo and joongang ilbo (2013 to 2017). The study collected data, portable document format (PDF), from the online archive of dong-a ilbo and joongang ilbo. We coded the length of the article, the frequency, the size of the picture, and the structural form of the article. Inter-coder reliability was compared with data previously investigated by the researcher. Inter-coder reliabilities for study 1 and 2 was .89 and .85. To examine hypotheses, descriptive analysis, correlations, and cross-tap analysis were performed. Results - The results partially supported the hypotheses proposing the significant role of sports stars as the agenda setters in distributing sport media contents. In specific, the study found that the number of articles about sports stars prevailed the number of articles about regular athletes. Besides, studies found that the use of photos was more frequent in articles of sports starts than that of regular athletes. In sports newspaper articles, featured story articles were used more than straight-articles for news relating to sports stars. Also, sports newspaper of sports stars contained more information associated within an event rather than outside of an event. Conclusions - In sports journalism, this study challenges the current theory that the media affects the composition and the content of sports coverages. As the principle of the agenda-setting of sports media, the influence of sports stars must be continuously studied along with a follow-up study.

keywords
Sport Media Distributional Channel, Sport Newspaper, Sport Star, Agenda Setting, Agenda Provider

Reference

1.

Ban, H., & McCombs, M. E. (2007). Revisiting Agenda-Setting Theory: A Five-Phases Evolution Model. Communication Theory, 3(2), 7-53.

2.

Boyle, R. (2006). Sports journalism: Context and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

3.

Burch, L., Frederick, E. L., Zimmerman, H. M., & Clavio, G. E. (2011). Agenda-setting and LA Copa Mundial:marketing through agenda-setting on soccer blogs during the 2010 World Cup. Sport Management and Marketing, 10(3/4), 213-231.

4.

Clavio, G., & Miloch, K. S. (2009). Agenda-setting in minor league hockey: a strategic justification and practical guide. Sport Management and Marketing, 5(1/2), 151-161.

5.

Croteau D. R., & Hoynes, W. (2002). Media/Society:Industries, Images and Audiences. Thousands Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

6.

Duncan, M. C. (1990). Sports photographs and sexual difference: Images of women and men in the 1984 and 1988 Olympic games. Sociology of Sport Journal, 7(1), 22-43.

7.

Eagleman, A. N. (2009). Race, nationality, and Major League Baseball: An examination of agenda-setting in two general-interest sport magazine. North American Society for Sport Management (NASSM) Annual Conference, Columbia, South Carolina.

8.

Fortunato, J. A. (2001). The ultimate assist: The relationship and broadcast strategies of the NBA and television networks. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

9.

Fortunato, J. A. (2008). NFL agenda-setting: The NFL programming schedule: A study of agenda-setting. Journal of Sports Media, 3(1), 27-49.

10.

Fortunato, J. A. (2009). The television framing methods of the national basketball assiciation: An agenda-setting application. New Jersey Journal of Communication, 9(2), 166-181.

11.

Hardin, M., Walsdorf, D., & Hardin, B. (2002). The framing of sexual diffetence in SI for kids editorial photos. Mass Communication & Society, 5(3), 341-359.

12.

Hsieh, H-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis, Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.

13.

Jones, R., Murrell, A., & Jackson, J. (1999). Pretty versus powerful in the sports pages: Print media coverage of U.S. Women’s Olympic gold medal winning teams. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 23(2), 183-192.

14.

Kim, B. C. (2010). Granger Causality and Times Series Analysis of Public Agenda and Media Agenda of Internet Portal Site. Korean Political Communication Association, 16(16), 33-63.

15.

Kim, S. G. (2002). The Understanding of Sports Contents. Seoul, Korea: Hanul Publishing Group.

16.

Kim, S. T., & Lee, Y. W. (2006). New Functions of Internet Mediated Agenda-Setting: Agenda-Rippling and Reversed Agenda-Setting. Korean Society for Journalism & Comunication Studies, 50(3), 175-204.

17.

Kinnick, K. N. (1998). Gender Bias in Newspaper Profiles of 1996 Olympic Athletes: A Content Analysis of Five Major Dailies. Women’s Studies in Communication, 21(2), 212-37.

18.

Knoppers, A., & Elling, A. (2004). We do not engage in promotional journalism: Discursive strategies used by sport journalists to describe the selection process. International Review of Sport Sociology, 39(1), 55–71.

19.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

20.

Lee, J. H., Choi, Y. J., & Lee, C. (2003). Agenda setting effects on online users: The analysis of the World Cup coverage and online discussions. In annual conference of the Communication and Technology Division, ICA, San Diego, California.

21.

Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in Mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587-604.

22.

McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543-557.

23.

McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.

24.

McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas, Journal of Communication, 43(2). 58-67.

25.

McQuail D. (1994). Mass communication theory. New York, NY: Sage.

26.

Miller, K. (2005). Communication theories: Perspectives, processes, and contexts(2nd ed.). New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.

27.

Oh, K, C., & Kim, C. G. (2014). The Influence of Sports Star Images from Sports Advertisements on Teenagers` Sports Participation and Buying Intention. Koran Society for Sport Management, 19(4), 107-119.

28.

Park, S. Y., Kim, T. H., & Jang, K. R. (2014). A Study on components of sports star reputation. Koran Society for Sport Management. 19(3), 33-45.

29.

Pedersen, P. M., Laucella, P. C., Kian, E. M., & Geurin, A. N. (2017). Strategic Sport Communication(2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

30.

Riffe, D, Lacy, S., & Fico, F.G. (2005). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative analysis in research. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

31.

Rowe, D. (2004). Sport, culture and the media: The unruly trinity(2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

32.

Shaw, D., & McCombs, M. (1977). The emergence of the message: Theories of influence on mass media content. New York, NY: Longman.

33.

Son, Y. J. (2005). Theoretical and practical review of agenda setting. Kwanhun Club, 97, 11-19.

34.

Son, Y. J., & Weaver, D. (2005). Another look at what moves public opinion: Media agenda setting and polls in the 2000 U. S. election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 174-197.

35.

Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2017). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Soceity, 20(5), 2028-2049.

36.

Wanta, W., & Legget, D. (1989). Gender stereotypes in wire service sports photos. Newspaper Research Journal, 10(3), 105-114.

37.

Wenner, L. A. (1989). The research agenda. In L. A. Wenner, (Ed.), Media, sports, and society (pp.13-48). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

38.

Whannel, G. (2001). Punishment, redemption and celebration in the popular press: the case of David Beckham. In D. L. Andrews & S. J. Jackson (Eds.), Sport Stars: The cultural politics of sporting celebrity (pp.138-150). Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.

39.

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2003). Mass media research: An introduction. Boston, MA; Wadsworth.

40.

Won, Y. S., & Ham, E. J. (2010). Media Sport plus. Seoul, Korea: Daekyung Books.

41.

Yoo, S.K., Reichart Smith, L., & Kim, D. (2013). Communication theories and sport studies. In P. M. Pedersen (Ed.), Handbook of sport communication (pp.8-19). New York, NY: Routledge.

42.

Zimmerman, M. H., Clavio, G. E., & Lim, C. (2011). Set the agenda like Beckham: a professional sports league’s use of YouTube to disseminate messages to its users. Sport Management and Marketing, 10(3/4), 180-195.

The Journal of Distribution Science