바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Government R&D Technology Commercialization Policy Case Study: Focusing on Technical Information Distribution

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.2, pp.53-69
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.2.201902.53
Yun, Jeong-Keun
Kwon, Jae-Chul
Choi, Sun-Hee

Abstract

Purpose - National scientific technology R&D investment is exceeding 60 trillion won per year, and the results of patent applications and technology transfers are visually improving. However, despite the improving research results of national R&D, the practical results of technology startups are mediocre. It is now time to expand the construction of the technology commercialization ecosystem, where the expansion of national R&D leads to the results of technology startups. Therefore, this study discussed the measures to increase the competitiveness of technology startups through the factual survey of the companies that benefitted from R&D support programs. Research design, data, and methodology - This study targeted 996 companies that benefitted from the R&D projects of the Technology Transfer Center for National R&D Programs, and deducted itemized issues through the survey replies. Survey questions were prepared to estimate the national R&D results, and the technology recognition path, the purpose of detailed introduction of the technology, investment of the commercialization fund, economic results, and the factors of success and failure were analyzed. Results - As for the recognition rate of technology during the process of corporate technology commercialization through the technology transfer, recognition through project participation showed a high response rate, and diverse implications of technology commercialization were deducted through the analysis of economic results. As for the resolution alternatives, the proliferation of technology commercialization platform that can create excellent technology for the companies in early stages and the measure of expanding the distribution of technology infrastructure were suggested. In this study, public technology commercialization strategy is established, and the innovative marketing strategy is presented. Conclusions - This study reveal that the result of creating scientific technology jobs should be deducted, in order to produce the revolutionary results of job creation by suggesting the success models of technology commercialization based on domestic scientific technology. In particular, even though the support systems for public research results are being diversely suggested, accurate studies on their actual conditions are currently lacking. Therefore, this study suggest realistic political alternatives to assure results in the process of public technology commercialization, by examining the current state of public research results of R&D support institutions and diagnosing the issues.

keywords
R&amp, D Technology Transfer, Public Technology Startup, Technology Marketing, Marketing Strategy Model, Technical Information Distribution

Reference

1.

Bak, S. H., & Jeong, D. B. (2015). Support for public research institutes to spread R&D performance. Industrial Innovation Research, 31(4), 23-47.

2.

Choi, D. R., & Suh, G. H. (2017). A Study on the Effects of Small Business Management Resultby the Korean Government: Focus on SEMAS. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 7(3), 33-43.

3.

Han, S. S. (2016). Industry Structure, Technology Characteristics, Technology Marketing and Performance of Technology – Based Start-ups: With Focus on Technology Marketing Strategy. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(2), 93-101.

4.

Han, S. S., & Yim, D. S. (2018). Path Dependence in Industry-University Cooperation- In terms of Industry’s Voluntary Participation. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(3), 45-56.

5.

Jung, H. J. (2017). Trends and Future Directions of Corporate e-learning Contents. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(2), 65-72.

6.

Laura, A., & Kusmoldaeva. (2016). Innovative Technologies in Public Administration. East Asian Journal of Business Economics, 4(1), 1-4.

7.

Lee, S. C., Lim, W. H., & Suh, E. K. (2014). Youth Startup Firms: A Case Study on the Survival Strategy for Creating Business Performance. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(6), 80-87.

8.

Lee, S. H. (2018). Policy Effect and Improvement Plan of R&D Support for Small and Medium Companies, KDI.

9.

Lee, S. S. (2016). Universities Technology Commercialization Governance -Focusing on TLOs and Technology Holding Companies. INNOVATION STUDIES, 12(4), 197-207.

10.

Liao, S. C. (2014). Using the MCDM of the Innovative Product Value Chainto Promote New Product Design. East Asian Journal of Business Management. 4(3), 27-37.

11.

Min, J. W. (2014). Analysis of success factors about technology transfer and commercialization of public research institutions and university, Korea University.

12.

Min, K. D., Huh, M. Y., & Han, J. H. (2018). A Success factor for Technology Commercialization for Start-upsby the Weighted-BMO Model. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(11), 39-54.

13.

Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy. (2017). Research Report on the Actual Status of Technology Transfer in Public Research Institutes in 2017.

14.

Ministry of Science and Technology (2017). 2017 National R&D Project Survey Analysis Report.

15.

Razgaitis, R. (2003). Valuation and pricing of technologybased intellectualproperty. New York, NY: Wiley.

16.

Seo, D. S. (2015). E-Strategy between European and Korean Innovative Business Channels in Post-New Normal Era. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(4), 59-66.

17.

Shan, Y., & Shuai, S. (2014). A Study of the Factors that Impact Chinese Consumers’ Purchasing Intent for High-Tech Products. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(1), 37-40.

18.

Vohora, A., & Lockett, A. (2003). Critical Junctures In The Development Of UniversityHigh-Tech Spinout Companies. In Academy Of Management Proceedings. Academy Of Management.

19.

Yoon, K. C., & Lee, J. E. (2017). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Temperament and Social Capitalon Entrepreneurial Intention before Start-up. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8(6), 97-109.

The Journal of Distribution Science