The Effects of The Parent Brand-Congruity on the Attitude to Expanded Brand

Kang,, M. , & Hwang,, H. (2019). The Effects of The Parent Brand-Congruity on the Attitude to Expanded Brand. The Journal of Distribution Science, 17(2), 77-89, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.2.201902.77

copy

Downloaded
Viewed

PDF Download

Abstract

Purpose - This study presents the relationships between parent brand-self image congruence, parent brand -functional congruity, perceived fit between parent brand and extension product, and consumer's attitude toward extension product using the structural equation model. As for preceding concepts having a direct effect on consumer's attitude toward brand extension, the study focuses on parent brand-self image congruence and parent brand-functional congruity. It also looks at the effect of parent brand-self image congruence and parent brand-functional congruity on the consumer's attitude toward extension product and identifies if the perceived fit between parent brand and extension product is a concept playing a mediating role between parent brand-self image congruence or parent brand-functional congruity and consumer's attitude toward brand extension product. Research design, data, and Methodology - SPSS for Windows 18.0 and AMOS 18.0 were used for data analysis. Then, the Cronbach's α coefficient was obtained using SPSS for Windows 18.0 to measure reliability. In addition, the convergence and discriminative measures of the measured items were statistically verified using AMOS 18.0. Finally, we have validated a path model and a parameter model in which brand personality-self-matched attitude toward brand extension. Results - Studies have shown that the impact of parent brand-self image consistency and parent brand-functional consistency on the attitude of extended products was positive. Perceived fit between parent brand and extension products has been shown to play a role of intermediary between parent brand-self image congruence and consumer attitudes to extended products. However, perceived fit between parent brand and extension products did not play a role as intermediary between the parent brand-functional congruity and the attitude toward the extended product. Finally, in relation to the causal relationship between parent brand-congruity (self image/functionality) and attitudes to extended products. The effect of parent brand-functional coherency on attitudes toward extended products was found to be greater in groups with higher involvement than in those with lower involvement. Conclusions - Although few studies have been done on what variables mediated when parent brand-self image consistency and parent brand-functional coherency affect consumer attitude, this paper is significant in finding whether perceived fitness between the parent brand-congruity and the extension product is mediated.

keywords: The Parent Band-Self Image Congruity, The Parent Brand-Functionality Congruity, Perceived fit between Parent Brand and Extended Product, Consumer Involvement, Consumer Attitude toward Extended Product

Reference

Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring Brand & Equity across Products & Markets. California Management Rev, 38(Spring), 102-120.

Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.

Ahn, K. H., & Im, M. W. (2008). the moderating effect of product type & self-monitoring - The Effect of Product Benefit on Brand Attachment & Brand Commitment. Journal of Consumer Studies, 19(1), 169-189.

Ahn, K. H., & Li, J. (2006). A Study of the Effect of Congruity Between Parent Brand Image & Self-Image on Consumer`s Brand Attitude toward Extended Brand Product. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 11(3), 85-103.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practices: A Review &Recommended Two Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.

Aron, A., Steele, J. L., Kashdan, T. B., & Pérez, M. (2006). When Similars Do Not Attract. Tests of a Prediction from the Self-Expansion Model. Personal Relationships, 13, 387-396.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(Spring), 74-94.

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions & the Extended Self, Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), 139-68.

Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (2001). The Impact of Parental Brand Attribute Associations & Affect on Brand Extension Evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 53(3), 111-122.

10.

Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K.(1998), Symbolic & Functional Positioning of Brand. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15, 32-43.

11.

Dich, A., Dipankar, C., & Gabriel, B. (1990). Memory Based Inference during Consumer Choise. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 82-93.

12.

Farquhar, P. H., Herr, P. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1990). A Relational Model for Category Extensions of Brands, Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 856-860.

13.

Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers & Their Brands:Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 343-373.

14.

Foxall G. R., Goldsmith R. E., & Brown, S. (1998). Consumer Psychology for Marketing (2nd ed., pp. 256). London & New York: International Thompson Business Press.

15.

Goldsmith, R. E., & Emmert, J. (1991). Measuring Product Category Involvement: A Multi Method Study. Journal of Business Research, 23(4), 363–371.

16.

Goodstein, R. C. (1993), Category Based Applications & Extensions in Advertising: Motivating More Extensive Ad Processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 87-99.

17.

Gordon, M. E., McKeage, K., & Fox, M. A. (1998), Relationship Marketing Effectiveness: The Role of Involvement. Psychology & Marketing, 15(5), 443-459.

18.

Gouville, J. T. (2007). Eager Sellers & Stony Buyers. Harvard Business Review, 84(6), 98-106.

19.

Graeff, T. R. (1996). Using Promotional Messages to Manage the Effects of Brand & Self-image on Brand Evaluations. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(3), 4-18.

20.

Grime, I., Diamantopoulos, A., & Smith, G.(2002). Consumer Evaluations of Extensions & Their Effects on the Core Brand. European Journal of Marketing, 36(11/12), 1415–1438.

21.

Grubb, E. L., & Stern, B. L.(1971). Self-Concept &Significant Others. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 382-385.

22.

Hansen, H., & Hem, L. E. (2004). Brand Extension Evaluations: Effects of Affective Commitment, Involvement, Price Consciousness & Preference for Bundling in the Extension Category. Advances in Consumer Research. 31, 375-381.

23.

Hanzaee, K. H., Khoshpanjeh, M., & Rahnama, A. (2011). Evaluation of the Effects of Product Involvement Facets on Brand Loyalty. African journal of Business Management, 5(16), 6964-6971.

24.

Homer, P., & Kahle, L.(1988). A Structural Equation Test of Value-Attitude-Behavior Hierarchy. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54(4), 638-646.

25.

Hung, K., & Petrick, J. F.(2010). Develop a Measurement Scale for Constraints to Cruising. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(1), 206-228.

26.

Iyer, S. G., Banerjee, B., & Gabriel, L. L. (2011). Determinants of Consumer Attitudes towards Brand Extensions: An Experimental Study. International Journal of Management, 28(3), 809-823.

27.

Jamal, A., & Goode, M. (2001). Consumers & Brands: A Study of the Impact of Self-Image Congruence on Brand Preference & Satisfaction. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(7), 482-492.

28.

Kang, J. H. (2002). A Structural Model of Image-Based &Utilitarian Decision-Making Processes for Participant Sport Consumption. Journal of Sport Management, 16(3), 173-189.

29.

Kim, E. Y., & Brandon, L. (2010). Modeling Brand Equity for Lifestyle Brand Extensions: A Strategic Approach into Generation Y vs. Baby Boomer. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 35-48.

30.

Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Insights from A to Z. Canada: Jhon Wiley & Sons, INC.

31.

Kressmann, F., Sirgy, M. J., Herrmann, A., Huber, F., Huber, S., & Lee, D. J. (2006). Direct & Indirect Effects of Self-image Congruence on Brand Loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59, 955-964.

32.

Krugman, H. E.(1967). The Measurement of Advertising Involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly. 30, 583-596.

33.

Lastovicka, J. L., & Gardner, D. M. (1979). Components of Involvement in Attitude Research Plays for High Stakes (Eds.). In J. C. Maloney & B. Silverman, AMA (pp.53-73).

34.

Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for Sale. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117–124.

35.

Lin, L. Y., & Chen, C. S. (2006). The Influence of the Country-of-origin Image, Product Knowledge & Product Involvement on Consumer Purchase Decisions: An Empirical Study of Insurance & Catering Services in Taiwan. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23, 248–265.

36.

Ma, Q., Wang, K., Wang, X., Wang, C., & Wang, L. (2010). The Influence of Negative Emotion on Brand Extension as Reflected by the Change of N2: A Preliminary Study. Neuroscience letters, 485(3), 237-240.

37.

Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Livi, S. (2004). Recycling:Planned & Self - Expressive behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 227-236.

38.

Mao, H., & Krishnan, H. S. (2006). Effects of Prototype &Exemplar Fit on Brand Extension Evaluations: A Two Process Contingency Model. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 41-49.

39.

Martin, I. M., Stewart, D. W., & Matta, S. (2005). Branding Strategies, Marketing Communication, &Perceived Brand Meaning: The Transfer of Purposive, Goal–Oriented Brand Meaning to Brand Extensions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 275-294.

40.

Martinez, E., & De Chernatony, L. (2004). The Effect of Brand Extension Strategies upon Brand Image. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(1), 39-50.

41.

Milewicz, J., & Herbig, P. (1994). Evaluating the Brand Extension Decision Using a Model or Reputation Building. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 3(1), 39-47.

42.

Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 318-332.

43.

Mittal, B., Ratchford, B., & Prabhakar, P.(1990). Functional & Expressive Attributes as Determinants of Brand Attitude. Research in Marketing, 10, 135-155.

44.

Park, C. W., & Kim, K. H. (2001). Role of Consumer Relationships with a Brand in Brand Extensions: Some Exploratory Findings. Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 179-185.

45.

Park, C. W., Jaworski, B., & MacInnis, D. (1986). Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management. Journal of Marketing, 50(October), 135-145.

46.

Park, C. W., Milberg, S. J., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity & Brand Concept Consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 185–193.

47.

Park, S. Y., & Lee, E. M. (2005). Congruence between Brand Personality & Self-Image, & the Mediating Roles of Satisfaction & Consumer-Brand Relationship on Brand Loyalty. Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 39-45.

48.

Phau, I., & Lao, K. C. (2001). Brand Personality &Consumer Self-Expression: Single or Dual Carriageway?. Brand Management, 8(6), 428-444.

49.

Río, A. B., Vázquez, R., & Iglesias, V. (2001). The Role of the Brand Name in Obtaining Differential Advantages. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(6/7), 452-465.

50.

Romeo, J. B. (1991). The Effect of Negative Information on the Evaluations of Brand Extensions & the Family Brand. In Holman, R.H., & Solomon, M.R. (eds), Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 399-406

51.

Ruyter, J. C., & Wetzels, M. G. M. (2000). With a Little Help from My Fans-Extending Models of Prosocial Behaviour to Explain Supporters' Intentions to Buy Soccer Club Shares. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 387-409.

52.

Salinas, M., & Pérez, J. M. P. (2009). Modeling the Brand Extentions' Influence on Brand Image. Journal of Business Research, 62, 50–60.

53.

Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (1994). Consumer Behavior (7thed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.

54.

Shim, S. W. (2003). Advertising Effects in Brand Extension: The Artificial Link between the Parent &Extension Product. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 15(5), 131-151.

55.

Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-Concept in Consumer Behaviour:A Critical Review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287-300.

56.

Sirgy, M. J. (1986). Self-Congruity: Toward a Theory of Personality & Cybernetics. New York, NY: Praeger.

57.

Sirgy, M. J., & Johar, J. S. (1985). Self-Congruity Models versus Multiattribute Attitude Models: When to Use Which Positioning Model. In R. F. Lusch, G. T. Ford, G. L. Frazier, R. D. Howell, C. A. Ingene, M. Reilly, &R. W. Stampfl, AMA Educators Proceedings. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 11-15.

58.

Sirgy, M. J., & Samli, A. C. (1985). A Path Analytic Model of Store Loyalty Involving Self-Concept, Store Image, Geographic Loyalty, & Socioeconomics Status. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13, 265–271.

59.

Sirgy, M. J., & Su, C. (2000). Destination Image, Self-Congruity, & Travel Behavior: Toward an Integrative Model. Journal of Travel Research, 38(4), 340–352.

60.

Sirgy, M. J., Johar, J. S., Samli, A. C., & Claiborne, C. B. (1991). Self-Congruity versus Functional Congruity:Predictors of Consumer Behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(4), 363-375.

61.

Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (1992). The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share & Advertising Efficiency. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(August), 296-313.

62.

Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1992). The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 434-48.

63.

Sullivan, M. W. (1990). Measuring Image Spill-Overs in Umbrella-Branded Products. Journal of Business, 63, 309-329.

64.

Sung, Y. S., Park, E., & Han, M. K. (2005). The Influences of the Brand Personality on Brand Attachment & Brand Loyalty: Centered on the Differences between the Brand Community Members &Nonmembers. Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 156.

65.

Tauber, E. M. (1988). Brand Leverage: Strategy for Growth in a Cost-Control World. Journal of Advertising Research, 28, 26-30.

66.

Tsai, S. P. (2005). Utility, cultural symbolism and emotion:A comprehensive model of brand purchase value. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(3), 277-291.

67.

Uggla, H., & Åsberg, P. E. (2010). A Psycho Semiotic Research Agenda for Strategic Brand Alliances. The IUP Journal of Brand Management, 8(1/2), 92–104.

68.

Vernette, E. (2003). Personnalité de la Marque et Image de soi. Les tendances du Marketing. ESCP-EAP, 1-21.

69.

Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. (2006). Drivers of Brand extension success. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 18-34.

70.

Yeung, C. W. M., & Robert, S. W. Jr. (2004). Affect, Appraisal, & Consumer Judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 412–424.

71.

Yi, Y. J., & La, S. A. (2002). Brand Personality - Brand Identification - Brand Equity Model: An Exploratory Study on the Difference Between Users vs. Non -Users. Korea Marketing Review, 17(3), 1-33.

72.

Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.17 No.2

The Effects of The Parent Brand-Congruity on the Attitude to Expanded Brand

Abstract

Reference

The Journal of Distribution Science