바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Earnings Management in Price Cartel Firms and the Case of Distribution Industry

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.4, pp.5-16
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.4.201904.5
You, Philip
Yi, Jaekyung
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This study examines whether price cartel firms perform downward earnings management to avoid or minimize penalty surcharges levied by the Korea Fair Trade Commission and analyzes such earnings management in distribution industry. Research design, data, and methodology - We use 247 firms from 64 price cartel cases in the period of 2011-2016, and collect data from 3 years before to 3 years after the start of price cartel. Earnings management is measured by discretionary accruals. Three discretionary accrual estimation models are employed; modified Jones model, ROA adjusted modified Jones model and CFO-adjusted modified Jones model. For pre- and post-cartel periods, one year, two year, and three year windows are used. Additional empirical analyses are performed for distribution industry sub-sample of 25 cartel firms. Result - The regression results show that cartel firms' discretionary accruals are significantly lower in the period after the start of price cartel than before. And discretionary accruals are lower in cartel firms than in non-cartel firms during the cartel period. Cartel firms in distribution industry also show the earnings management similar to those in other industries. Conclusions - These two findings lead to the conjecture that managers of cartel firms manage their earnings downward. This behavior is indistinguishable between firms in distribution industry and other industries.

keywords
Price Cartel, Distribution Industry, Earnings Management, Discretionary Accruals

Reference

1.

Cahan, S. (1992). The effect of antitrust investigation on discretionary accruals: A refined test of political-cost hypothesis. The Accounting Review, 67(1), 77-95.

2.

Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225.

3.

Gill-de-Albornoz, B., & Illueca, M. (2005). Earnings management under price regulation: Empirical evidence from Spanish electricity industry. Energy Economics, 27(2), 279-304.

4.

Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228.

5.

Key, K. G. (1997). Political cost incentives for earnings management in the cables television industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23(3), 309-337.

6.

Korea Fair Trading Commission. (2011-2016). Committee Resolutions.

7.

Korea Fair Trading Commission. (2017). Enforcement Decree of Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act.

8.

Korea Fair Trading Commission. (2016). Statictical Yearbook_2015.

9.

Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance-matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.

10.

Navissi, F. (1999). Earnings management under price regulation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(2), 281-304

11.

Rees, L., Gill, S., & Gore, R. (1996). An investigation of asset write-downs and concurrent abnormal accruals. Journal of Accounting Research, 34(3), 157-169.

12.

Thomas, J., & Tung, S. (1992). Cost manipulation incentives under cost reimbursement: Pension costs for defense contracts. Accounting Review, 67(4), 691-711.

13.

Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1978). Toward a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-134.

14.

Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

15.

Zang, A. (2012). Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 675-703.

The Journal of Distribution Science