ISSN : 1738-3110
Purpose - The relationship between multinationality and performance has become a hot topic in academic circles and is very important for multinational firms, especially for Chinese multinational firms, who need more experience to enter the international market. Given this background, this paper attempts to figure out the importance of multinationality to China's firm performance and to explore whether the Four-stage Theory can also be applied to China's firms. Research design, data, and methodology - We employ the panel data of 435 multinational firms from 2008 to 2017 chosen from China's A-shares to conduct an empirical analysis by using a fixed-effects model. In the paper, the performance is represented by ROA (return on assets), treated as a dependent variable, and multinationality is represented by FSTS (foreign sales/total sales), treated as an independent variable. Results - We find that the performance first decreases then rises, then falls down, and rises again in the end. Hence there is a W-shaped relationship between the multinationality of the Chinese manufacturing industries and firm performance, proving that the four-stage theory is also applicable to Chinese multinational firms. Conclusions - These empirical results can provide some advice for policymakers to improve the firm performance such as reducing the logistics cost of multinationality.
Almodóvar, P. (2012). The international performance of standardizing and customizing Spanish firms: The M curve relationships. Multinational Business Review, 20(4), 306-330.
Berry, H., & Kaul, A. (2016). Replicating the multinationality‐performance relationship: Is there an Scurve? Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2275-2290.
Chen, S., & Tan, H. (2012). Region effects in the internationalization–performance relationship in Chinese firms. Journal of world business, 47(1), 73-80.
Ferraris, A. (2014). Rethinking the literature on “multiple embeddedness” and subsidiary-specific advantages. Multinational Business Review, 22(1), 15-33.
Ferraris, A., Bresciani, S., & Del Giudice, M. (2016). International diversification and firm performance: a four-stage model. EuroMed Journal of Business, 11(3), 362-375.
Grant, K., Matousek, R., Meyer, M., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2017). A research note on multinationality and firm performance: Nonparametric frontier analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(10), 1408-1424.
Graves, C., & Shan, Y. G. (2014). An empirical analysis of the effect of internationalization on the performance of unlisted family and nonfamily firms in Australia. Family Business Review, 27(2), 142-160.
He, Y. (2018). A Study on the Profitability of the Commercial Bank in Terms of Interest Rate Marketization: Based on FMOLS Model. The International Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 9(8), 41-50.
Kirca, A. H., Hult, G. T. M., Roth, K., Cavusgil, S. T., Perryy, M. Z., Akdeniz, M. B., & Miller, J. C. (2011). Firm-specific assets, multinationality, and financial performance: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Academy of management journal, 54(1), 47-72.
Knight, G. A., & Liesch, P. W. (2016). Internationalization:From incremental to born global. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 93-102.
Lee, S., Kim, M., & Davidson III, W. N. (2015). Value Relevance of Multinationality: Evidence from Korean Firms. Journal of International Financial Management &Accounting, 26(2), 111-149.
Li, D., Miller, S. R., Eden, L., & Hitt, M. A. (2012). The impact of rule of law on market value creation for local alliance partners in BRIC countries. Journal of International Management, 18(4), 305-321.
Li, L., Qian, G., & Qian, Z. (2012). The performance of small and medium-sized technology-based enterprises:Do product diversity and international diversity matter? International Business Review, 21(5), 941-956.
Luo, Y., Sun, J., & Wang, S. L. (2011). Comparative strategic management: An emergent field in international management. Journal of international management, 17(3), 190-200.
Oh, C. H., & Contractor, F. (2014). A regional perspective on multinational expansion strategies: Reconsidering the three‐stage paradigm. British Journal of Management, 25(2014), S42-S59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12019
Rugman, A.M. (1976). Risk reduction by international diversification. Journal of International Business Studies 7(2), 75-80.
Rugman, A. M., & Oh, C. H. (2010). Does the regional nature of multinationals affect the multinationality and performance relationship? International Business Review, 19(5), 479-488.
Rugman, A., Verbeke, A., & Yuan, W. (2011). Reconceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal's classification of national subsidiary roles in the multinational enterprise. Journal of Management studies, 48(2), 253-277.
Singh, D. A., Gaur, A. S., & Schmid, F. P. (2010). Corporate diversification, TMT experience, and performance. Management International Review, 50(1), 35-56.
Singla, C., & George, R. (2013). Internationalization and performance: A contextual analysis of Indian firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2500-2506.
Shin, J., Mendoza, X., Hawkins, M. A., & Choi, C. (2017). The relationship between multinationality and performance: Knowledge-intensive vs. capital-intensive service micro-multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 26(5), 867-880.
Tsai, H. T. (2014). Moderators on international diversification of advanced emerging market firms. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1243-1248
Xiao, S. S., Jeong, I., Moon, J. J., Chung, C. C., & Chung, J. (2013). Internationalization and performance of firms in China: Moderating effects of governance structure and the degree of centralized control. Journal of International Management, 19(2), 118-137.
Wang, J., & He, Y. (2019). A Study on the Transnational Performance of China’s Enterprises. Journal of Economics, Marketing and Management, 7(1), 1-14.
Zhou, C. (2018). Internationalization and performance:evidence from Chinese firms. Chinese Management Studies, 12(1), 19-34.