바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

A Study on Performance Improvement and Perception Difference of SMEs Using TPB: Focusing on Corporate Ethical Responsibility Activities, Personal Characteristics and POS

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.8, pp.57-66
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.8.201908.57
YANG, Hoe-Chang

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to elucidate the perception differences between CEOs and employees, and to derive a plan for improving performance by using theory of planned behavior (TPB) to enhance the competitiveness of SMEs exposed to various difficulties until recently. Research design, data and methodology - A total of 238 valid questionnaires were collected for CEOs and members of SMEs. In order to clarify the difference of perception, independent sample t-test and multi-group analysis using AMOS were conducted. Simple regression analysis and structural equation were used to confirm whether the theory of planned behavior was applied at the level of SME. Results - The CEO group is more aware of company's ethical responsibility activities and organizational support than the group of employees, and collectivism contributes more to organizational development than individualism tendency. Also, the theory of planned behavior is applied to the SME level as well. Conclusion - This study suggest that CEOs need to accept the pluralism of their members for the development of SMEs. In addition, it is necessary to form a consensus on ethical responsibility activities that corporations are performing by supporting diverse strategies and members' participation in management decision-making.

keywords
Performance Improvement, Perception Difference, SME, TPB(Theory of Planned Behavior)

Reference

1.

Abbasi, M. S., Tarhini, A., Elyas, T., & Shar, F. (2015). Impact of individualism and collectivism over the individual’s technology acceptance behaviour. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(6), 747-768.

2.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

3.

Ajzen, I. (2015). Consumer attitudes and behavior: The theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 70(2), 121-138.

4.

Bae, J. H., & Park, H. S.(2016). The impact of SME's organizational capabilities on proactive CSR and corporate performance: The mediating effect of proactive CSR. Journal of Service Research and Studies, 6(4), 101-118.

5.

Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 63-86.

6.

Blau, G. J. (1964). Exchange and Power in social Life. New York, NY: Wiley.

7.

Cho, Y. H., & Cho, Y. H. (2004). Individualismcollectivism orientation, conflict context and conflict resolution modes. Korean Management Review, 33(2), 423-448.

8.

Cho, Y. H., Cho, Y. H., & Ahn, J. H. (2002). A study on the individualism-collectivism orientation and psychological contracts in organizations. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15(3), 89-111.

9.

Cho, Y. H., Cho, Y. H., & Yang, H. C. (2005). A study on the relationship between value orientation and brain use dominance. Korean Journal of Management, 13(3), 73-98.

10.

Choi, B. K., Moon, H. K., & Joo, Y. R. (2017). Review and future research direction for CSR perception in Korea : Focus on employees’ perceived CSR. Korean Management Review, 46(5), 1247-1302.

11.

Cohen, A., & Abedallah, M. (2015). The mediating role of burnout on the relationship of emotional intelligence and self-efficacy with OCB and performance. Management Research Review, 38(1), 2-28.

12.

Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: Analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.

13.

De Roeck, K., & Maon, F. (2016). Building the theoretical puzzle of employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 609-625. Published online ahead of print. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3081-2.

14.

Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44-56.

15.

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.

16.

Eom, K., & Yang, H. C. (2014). Effects of employees’ job characteristics, commitment, and self-leadership on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(7), 13-21.

17.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston. MA: Addison Wesley.

18.

Frank, B. Enkawa, T., & Schvaneveldt, S. J. (2015). The role of individualism vs. collectivism in the formation of repurchase intent: A cross-industry comparison of the effects of cultural and personal values. Journal of Economic Psychology, 51, 261-278.

19.

Han, H. S. (2015). Travelers' pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-beliefnorm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management, 47(April), 164-177.

20.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverley Hills, CA:Sage.

21.

Hui C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualismcollectivism:A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(2), 225-248.

22.

Indarti, S., Solimun, Fernandes, A. A. R., & Hakim, W. (2017). The effect of OCB in relationship between personality, organizational commitment and job satisfaction on performance. Journal of Management Development, 36(10), 1283-1293.

23.

Jin. S. H., Lee, C. G., & Lee, D. M. (2011). The effect of quality management system and absorptive capacity on the competitiveness of small and medium venture manufacturing company in electric and electronic industry. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 39(2), 292-304.

24.

Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 857-878.

25.

Jung, H. J., & Shin, M. J. (2016). Review of Korean corporate social responsibility studies in management. Korean Journal of Management, 24(2), 103-145.

26.

Kautonen, R., van Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655-674.

27.

Kiessling, T., Isaksson, L., & Yasar, B. (2016). Market orientation and CSR: Performance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 269-284.

28.

Kim, S. H., & Lee, K. W. (2013). Corporate social responsibility(CSR) in accounting: Review and future direction. Korea Journal of Business Administration, 26(9), 2397-2425.

29.

Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854-1884.

30.

Lee, T. J., Cho, Y. H., & Cho. Y. B. (2002). A study on the individualism-collectivism orientation and attitudes toward industrial relations. Korean Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(1), 93-121.

31.

Liao, C., Chen, J., & Yen, D. C. (2007). Theory of planning behavior (TPB) and customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2804-2822.

32.

Mahon, D., Cowan, C., & McCarthy, M. (2006). The role of attitudes, subjective norm, perceived control and habit in the consumption of ready meals and takeaway in Great Britain. Food Quality and Preference, 17(6), 474-481.

33.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.

34.

Morgeson, F. P., Aguinis, H. Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. S. (2013). Extending corporate social responsibility research to the human resource management and organizational behavior domains: A look to the future. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 805-824.

35.

Mustamil, N., & Quaddus, M. (2009). Cultural influence in the ethical decision making process: The perspective of Malaysian managers. The Business Review, 13(1), 171-176.

36.

McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(1), 93-104.

37.

Nasco, S. A., Toledo, E. G., & Mykytyn, P. P. (2008). Predicting electronic commerce adoption in Chilean SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 61(6), 697-705.

38.

NISE(2018). Dictionary of special education terms (NISE:National Institute for Special Education). Seoul, Korea:Hawoo Publishing.

39.

Park, H. J., & Lee, S. H. (2012). Relationship among corporate social responsibility, trust in fair trade certified products, purchase intention and willingness to pay a premium price. Journal of Product Research, 30(7), 103-122.

40.

Park, J. C., Kim, K. J., & Lee, H. J. (2010). Developing a scale for measuring the corporate social responsibility activities of Korea corporation: Focusing on the consumers' awareness. Asia Marketing Journal, 12(2), 27-52.

41.

Park, K. H., & Jung, J. Y. (2019). The Effect of competency of hair care workers on business performance. Journal of The Korean Society of Cosmetology, 25(1), 84-90.

42.

Paul, H., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29(March), 123-134.

43.

Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Moorman, R., & Fetter, R. (1990) The impact of transformational leader behaviors on employee trust, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.

44.

Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic management journal, 12(S2), 95-117.

45.

Song, Y. M., Jeong, J. P., & Park, B. G. (2019). Project management for the productivity improvement of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Industrial machinery and equipment manufacturing enterprises. KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering (KTSDE), 8(1), 1-12.

46.

Sung, J. H., Moon, J. S., & Kim, S. Y. (2019). A study on the relationship among emotional leadership, CEO trust, work engagement, and CEO legitimacy. Korean Review of Corporation Management, 10(1), 153-176.

47.

Tang. M., Werner, C., & Karwowski, M. (2016)Differences in creative mindset between Germany and Poland: The mediating effect of individualism and collectivism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 31-40.

48.

Ting, L. Y. (1993). In-group preference and homogeneity among African American and Chinese American students. Journal of Social Psychology, 133(2), 225-235.

49.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

50.

Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multi-method probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1006-1020.

51.

Vlachos, P. A., Panagopoulos, N. G., & Rapp, A. A. (2014). Employee judgments of and behaviors toward corporate social responsibility: A multi-study investigation of direct, cascading, and moderating effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 990-1017.

52.

Wayne, S. J., & Shore, L. M. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.

53.

Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Young consumers'intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135(1), 732-739.

54.

Yang, H. C. (2014). Revisiting self-enhancement bias and transformational leadership using the extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(9), 83-93.

55.

Yang, H. C., Cho, H. Y., & Lee, W. D. (2015). Multi-dimensional emotional intelligence effects on intrinsic/extrinsic motivation and job satisfaction:Analysis using laborer perceived organizational support. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(4), 13-18.

56.

Yoo, S. W. (2019). A study on the relationship between corporate social responsibility, trust, distrust and reputation. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(3), 93-106.

The Journal of Distribution Science