바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

How Do Consumers React to Scandals Involving Celebrity Endorsers and Endorsed Brands?

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.8, pp.77-85
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.8.201908.77
CHOI, Jieun

Abstract

Purpose - The use of celebrity endorsers is a strategy long-since used by companies to improve the persuasive impact of their company's advertising. However, much like anyone else, celebrities are flawed human beings, and therefore often find themselves involved in scandals. Companies must consider the potential of scandals when using a celebrity endorser to represent their brand or product. This research focuses on the process consumers use to justify scandals involving celebrity endorsers. Specifically, this research divides the justification processes used by consumers to maintain support for celebrities involved in a scandal into moral decoupling and moral rationalization and proposes antecedents and consequences for these processes. Methodology - To verify the hypotheses suggested by this study, an online survey was conducted, and data was analyzed using a structural equation model. Result - Results showed that consumer empathy for the celebrity endorser and external attribution of the scandal presented were positively related to moral decoupling and moral rationalization. In addition, moral rationalization was positively related to consumers' attitude towards the celebrity endorser, which also enhanced brand attitude. However, the relationship between moral decoupling and the consumer's attitude toward the celebrity endorser was not statistically significant. Conclusion - This research serves to expand the scope of available research on the persuasiveness of celebrity endorsers and provides practical guidelines for marketers.

keywords
Scandal, Celebrity Endorser, Moral Decoupling, Moral Rationalization, Consumer Attitudes toward Celebrity Endorsers, Brand Attitude

Reference

1.

Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection. New York, NY:Guilford Press.

2.

Atkin, C., & Block, M. (1983). Effectiveness of celebrity endorsers. Journal of Advertising Research, 23(1), 57-61.

3.

Bartz, S., Molchanov, A., & Stork, P. A. (2013).When a celebrity endorser is disgraced: A twenty-five-year event study. Marketing Letters, 24(2), 131-141.

4.

Bhattacharjee, A., Berman, J. Z., & Reed, A. (2013). Tip of the hat, wag of the finger: How moral decoupling enables consumers to admire and admonish. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1167-1184.

5.

Carrillat, F. A., D'Astous, A., & Christianis, H. (2014). Guilty by association: The perils of celebrity endorsement for endorsed brands and their direct competitors. Psychology and Marketing, 31(11), 1024-1039.

6.

Carrillat, F. A., D'Astous, A., & Lazure, J. (2013). For better, for worse? Journal of Advertising Research, 53(1), 15-30.

7.

Choi, S. M., Lee, W. N., & Kim, H. J. (2005). Lessons from the rich and famous: A cross-cultural comparison of celebrity endorsement in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 85-98.

8.

D’Ambrosio, F., Olivier, M., Didon, D., & Besche, C. (2009). The basic empathy scale: A French validation of a measure of empathy in youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 160-165.

9.

Elberse, A., & Verleun, J. (2012). The economic value of celebrity endorsements. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(2), 149-165.

10.

Erdogan, B. Z. (1999). Celebrity endorsement: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(4), 291-314.

11.

Escalas, J. E., & Stern, B. B. (2003). Sympathy and empathy: Emotional responses to advertising dramas. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 566-578.

12.

Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford university press.

13.

Fong, C. P., & Wyer, R. S. (2012). Consumers’ reactions to a celebrity endorser scandal. Psychology and Marketing, 29(11), 885-896.

14.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

15.

Haberstroh, K., Orth, U. R., Hoffmann, S., & Brunk, B. (2015). Consumer response to unethical corporate behavior: A re-examination and extension of the moral decoupling model. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-13.

16.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Methodology In The Social Sciences:Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press

17.

Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and Cognitive Organization. Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107-112

18.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.

19.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.

20.

Hung, K., Chan, K. W., & Tse, C. H. (2011). Assessing celebrity endorsement effects in China: A consumer-celebrity relational approach. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(4), 608-623.

21.

Hwang, H. J., & Shin, H. S. (2012). Impact of a Brand Image Matching with the Advertising Model on Price Fairness Perceptions: Focus on Sports Advertising. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(3), 43-50.

22.

Kim, G. B., & Kim, B.G. (2016). Relationship among Brand Value Propositions, Brand Attitude and Brand Attachment considering Consumer Involvement. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(2), 103-111.

23.

Kim, S. D., Youn, M.K., & Kim, K.S. (2012). A Study of the Effect of Model Characteristics on Purchasing Intentions and Brand Attitudes. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(4), 47-53.

24.

Lee, J. S., Kwak, D. H., & Moore, D. (2015). Athletes’transgressions and sponsor evaluations: A focus on consumers’ moral reasoning strategies. Journal of Sport Management, 29(6), 672-687.

25.

Louie, T. A., Kulik, R. L., & Jacobson, R. (2001). When bad things happen to the endorsers of good products. Marketing Letters, 12(1), 13-23.

26.

McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310-321.

27.

McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321-336.

28.

Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W.R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 935-43.

29.

Soh, H. (2015). Consumer Responses to Storytelling Advertising: Investigating the Power of Empathic Response. Korean Journal of Advertising, 26(7), 59-79.

30.

Thwaites, D., Lowe, B., Monkhouse, L. L., & Barnes, B. R. (2012). The impact of negative publicity on celebrity ad endorsements. Psychology and Marketing, 29(9), 663-673.

31.

Till, B. D., & Shimp, T. A. (1998). Endorsers in advertising:The case of negative celebrity information. Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 67-82.

32.

Um, N. (2013). Celebrity scandal fallout: How attribution style can protect the sponsor. Psychology and Marketing, 30(6), 529-541.

33.

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573.

34.

White, D. W., Goddard, L., & Wilbur, N. (2009). The effects of negative information transference in the celebrity endorsement relationship. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 37(4), 322-335.

35.

Zhou, L., & Whitla, P. (2013). How negative celebrity publicity influences consumer attitudes: The mediating role of moral reputation. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1013-1020.

The Journal of Distribution Science