바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Price Discount and Membership Features on Trust in Luxury Online Shopping Malls

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2020, v.18 no.11, pp.31-39
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.11.202011.31
CHO, Yunseo
BANG, Jounghae
LEE, Jumin
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: This study attempts to explain why online luxury shopping malls have implemented a difficult registration process and membership fees. These features weaken online shopping convenience, one of the major reasons why people shop online instead of offline. Therefore, this study scrutinizes the effects of membership features on trust, focusing on the moderating effects of registration difficulty and membership fees. Research design, data and methodology: A survey method with a total of 296 survey data was used. A 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design was employed. The three independent variables are price discount rate (20% vs. 70%), registration difficulty (low vs. high), and membership fees (yes vs. no). Results: The results reveal that a price discount rate has a negative effect on trust, whereas membership fees and registration difficulty moderate its negative effect on trust. Conclusions: A high price discount rate lowers trust for online luxury shopping malls. Meanwhile, registration difficulty and membership fees can be used to prevent consumers from losing trust caused by the high price discount rate. Therefore, registration difficulty and membership fees are signals implying that not everyone can use these private online shopping malls, which provide low prices for luxury items.

keywords
Luxury Private Shopping Malls, Price Discount, S-E-D Model, Price-Quality Perception, Reference Price

Reference

1.

Abrams, J. (1964). A new method for testing pricing decision. Journal of Marketing, 28(3), 6-9. doi:10.2307/1249149

2.

Ayadi, N., Giraud, M., & Gonzalez, C. (2013). An investigation of consumers’ self-control mechanisms when confronted with repeated purchase temptations: Evidence from online private sales. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(3),272–281. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.01.010

3.

Baybars, M., & Ustundagli, E. (2011). Attitudes toward online shopping from the aspects of personal characteristics and shopping motive through a developing concept: Private shopping. The International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 3(2), 201-210.

4.

Berkowitz, E. N., & Walton, J. R. (1980). Contextual influences on consumer price responses: An experimental analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(3), 349-358. doi:10.2307/3150533

5.

Bettman, J. R. (1993). Perceived risk and its components: A model and empirical test. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(2), 184-190. doi:10.2307/3149824

6.

Biswas, A., & Blair, E. A. (1991). Contextual effects of reference prices in retail advertisements. Journal of Marketing, 55(3), 1-12. doi:10.2307/1252143

7.

Brock, T. C., & Brannon, L. A. (1992). Liberalization of commodity theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 135-144. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1301_11

8.

Cannon, C., Goldsmith, K. & Roux, C. (2019). A self‐regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer, 29(1), 104-127. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1035

9.

Cha., S., & Seo, B. (2019). The effect of brand trust of home meal replacement on repurchasing in online shopping. Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies. 9(3), 21-26.doi:10.13106/jbees.2019.vol9.no3.21

10.

Chang, T., & Wildt, A. (1994). Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(1), 16-22.doi:10.1177/0092070394221002

11.

Della Bitta, A. J., & Monroe, K. B. (1981). A multivariate analysis of the perception of value from retail price advertisements. In K. B. Monroe (Ed.), NA-Advances in Consumer Research Volume 08 (pp.161-165), Ann Abor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

12.

Edell, J. A., & Burke, M. C. (1987). The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of consumer Research, 14(3), 421-433. doi:10.1086/209124

13.

Gamliel, E., and Herstein, R. (2011). To save or to lose: does framing price promotion affect consumers' purchase intentions?. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(2), 152-158. doi:10.1108/07363761111115999

14.

Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725-737. doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(00)00021-9

15.

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. doi:10.2307/30036519

16.

Gierl, H., & Huettl, V. (2010). Are scarce products always more attractive? The interaction of different types of scarcity signals with products' suitability for conspicuous consumption. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 225–235. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.002

17.

Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21-38. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21

18.

Grewal, D., Marmorstein, H., & Sharma, H. (1996). Communicating price information through semantic cues: The moderating effects of situation and discount size. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 148-155. doi:10.1086/209473

19.

Grossman G. M., & Shapiro, C. (1988). Counterfeit-product trade. American Economic Review, 78(1), 59-75. doi:10.3386/w1876

20.

Groth, J. C. (1994). The exclusive value principle - A concept for marketing. Journal of product & Brand Management, 3(3), 8-18. doi:10.1108/10610429410067397

21.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham R. L., & Black, W. C.(1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey:Prentice Hall.

22.

Inman, J.J., Peter, A.C., & Raghubir, P. (1997). Framing the deal:The role of restrictions in accentuating deal value. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 68-79. doi:10.1086/209494

23.

Jang, D. Mattila, A.S., & Bai, B. (2007). Restaurant membership fee and customer choice: The effects of sunk cost and feelings of regret. International journal of hospitality management, 26(3), 687-697. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.06.001

24.

Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791-815. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.6.791

25.

Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1), 45-71. doi:10.1023/a:1019104520776

26.

Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E.(1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2(C), 219-266. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0

27.

Kalyanaram, D., & Little, J. D. C. (1994). An empirical analysis of latitude of price acceptance in consumer package goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 148-155.doi:10.1086/209407

28.

Keiser, S. K., & Krum, J. R. (1976). Consumer perceptions of retail advertising with overstated price savings. Journal of Retailing, 52(3), 27-36. doi:10.2307/1249991

29.

Kim, T. H. (2016). Sales promotion effectiveness: The impact of culture on demographic level. International Business Research, 9(4), 123-130. doi:10.5539 /ibr.v9n4p123

30.

Kim, J., & Ko, E. (2010). Impacts of luxury fashion brand’s social media marketing on customer relationship and purchase intention. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 1(3), 164-171.doi:10.1080/20932685.2010.10593068

31.

Kim, S., & Martinez, B. (2013). Fashion consumer groups and online shopping at private sale sites. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(4), 367-372. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01102.x

32.

Kwon, W., & Lennon, S. (2009). What induces online loyalty? online versus offline brand images. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 557-564. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.015

33.

Kwon, J., Seo, Y., & Ko, D. (2016). Effective luxury-brand advertising: The ES–IF matching (Entity–Symbolic versus Incremental–Functional) Model. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 459-471. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1226995

34.

Lambert, Z. V. (1970). Product perception: An important variable in price strategy. Journal of Marketing, 34(4), 68-76. doi:10.2307/1250715

35.

Le, N. B. M., & Hoang, T. P. T. (2020). Measuring trusts and the effects on the consumers’ buying behavior. Journal of Distribution Science, 18(3), 5-14. doi:10.15722/jds.18.3.202003.5

36.

Lee, H. J. (2020). The anti-consumption effect on the car sharing utility: The moderating effect of brand luxury level. Journal of Distribution Science, 18(6), 63-75. doi:10.15722/jds.18.6.202006.63

37.

Lee, S. Y., Chae, S. J., & Kim, J. W. (2018). The scarcity effect on product evaluation in retail: The curation message role. Journal of Distribution Science, 16(3), 79-86.doi:10.15722/jds.16.3.201803.79

38.

Lee, H., & Choi, J. (2014). Why do people visit social commerce sites but do not buy? The role of the scarcity heuristic as a momentary characteristic. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 8(7), 2383-2399. doi:10.3837/tiis.2014.07.010

39.

Lynn, M. (1989). Scarcity effects on value: Mediated by assumed expensiveness?. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(2), 257-274. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(89)90023-8

40.

Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology & Marketing, 8(1), 43-57. doi:10.1002/mar.4220080105

41.

Lynn, M. (1992). Scarcity’s enhancement of desirability: The role of naïve economic theories. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 67-78. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1301_6

42.

Madan, V., & Suri, R. (2000). Quality perception and monetary sacrifice: A comparative analysis of discount and fixed prices. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(3), 171-175. doi:10.1108/10610420110395395

43.

Monroe, K. B., & Chapman, J. D. (1987). Framing effects on buyer's subjective evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1), 193-197.

44.

Mussol, S., Aurier, P., & de Lanauze, G. S. (2019). Developing instore brand strategies and relational expression through sales promotions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Service,47(2019), 241-250. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.11.020

45.

Nia, A., & Zaichkowsky, J. (2000). Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brand. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(7), 485-497. doi:10.1108/10610420010351402.

46.

Ong, B. S. (2015). Attitudes, perceptions, and responses of purchasers versus subscribers-only for daily deals on hospitality products. Journal of Hospitality Marketing &Management, 24(2), 180-201. doi:10.1080/19368623.2014.901201

47.

Park, H., Lalwani, A. K., & Silvera, D. H. (2020). The impact of resource scarcity on price-quality judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(6), 1110–1124. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucz031

48.

Patterson, P. G., & Smith, T. (2001). Relationship benefits in service industries: A replication in a Southeast Asian context. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(6), 425-443. doi:10.1108/eum0000000006098

49.

Reynolds, K. E., & Beatty, S. E. (1999). Customer benefits and company consequences of customer-salesperson relationships in retailing. Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 11–32. doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(99)80002-5

50.

Sawyer, A. G., & Dickson, P. R. (1984). Psychological perspectives on consumer response to sales promotion. In K. E. Jocz (Ed.), Research on Sales Promotions (pp.1-21), Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

51.

Schindler, R. M. (1989). The excitement of getting a bargain:some hypothesis concerning the origins and effects of smartshopper feelings. In T. S. Srull (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research 16 (pp.447-53), Provo, UT: Association of Consumer Research.

52.

Scitovsky, T. (1944). Some consequences of the habit of judging quality by price. Review of Economic Studies, 12(2), 100-105. doi:10.2307/2296093

53.

Shah, D. (2000). A new definition of luxury. Textile View, 52(6), 6-7.

54.

Shen, K. N., Vel, P., & Khalifa, M. (2016). Website design: Place for luxury brands in cyberspace?. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(12), 1115-1129. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2016.1188987

55.

Sthapit, A., Jo, G. Y., & Hwang,Y. Y. (2016). Construal levels and online shopping: Antecedents of visits to and purchases from online retailers’ websites. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 7(3), 19-25. doi:10.13106/ijidb.2016.vol7.no3.19.

56.

Streff, F. M. (1991). Crash avoidance: New opportunities for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(1),77-79. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-77

57.

Sun, Z. Y. & Na, S. H. (2013). An analysis of purchase behaviors of department store users based on types of preference for luxury brands. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(10), 5-45.doi:10.15722/jds.11.10.201310.5

58.

Thaler, R. (2008). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing science, 27(1), 15-25. doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330

59.

Tham, K. W., Dastane, O., Johari, Z., & Ismail, N. B. (2019). Perceived risk factors affecting consumers’ online shopping behaviour. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(4), 246-260. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no4.249

60.

Urbany, J. E., Bearden, W. O., & Weilbaker, D. C. (1988). The effect of plausible and exaggerated reference prices on consumer perceptions and price search. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(1), 95–110. doi:10.1086/209148

61.

Verhallen, T. M. M., & Robben, H. S. J. (1995). Unavailability and the evaluation of goods. KYKLOS 48(3), 369-387. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1995.tb02320.x

62.

Vigneron, F., & Johnson, W. (1999). A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 3(1), 1-15.

63.

Winer, R. S. (1986). A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. Journal of consumer Research,13(2), 250-256. doi:10.1086/209064

64.

Wright, R. A., Greenberg, J., & Brehm, S. S. (2004). Motivational analyses of social behavior: Building on Jack Brehm's contributions to psychology. New York: Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9781410610089

The Journal of Distribution Science