바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Factors Effecting Online Social Decisions in Online Consumer Behavior

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2020, v.18 no.3, pp.67-76
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.3.202003.67
HAN, Sang-Seol
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: Consumers are affected by the purchase of a large number of opinions or support during the online purchasing process. This can be defined as the term of 'social decisions' on line. This paper seeks to explore the factors of influence on social decisions in on-line environment and to study in depth. Methodology: The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine the impact of factors on online social decisions. To verify the hypothesis of study, This study collected 256 from Seoul City, Gyeonggi Province and Chungcheong Province through Survey. Results: According to the research results, First, eWOM information usefulness have a positive impact on online social decisions, Second, online network connectedness have a positive impact on online social decisions. Third, innovative product have a positive impact on online social decisions. and the lower the category of knowledge, the more inclined it is to make online social decisions. Finally, social decisions have a positive impact on purchasing decisions about product. It is most significant that academic research has advanced consumer behavior in response to recent changes in the consumption environment. It is meaningful that we have studied in depth the changing consumer decision process in online channel environment.

keywords
Category Knowledge, eWOM Information Usefulness, Innovative Product, Online Consumer Behavior, Online Social Decisions, Network Connectedness

Reference

1.

Awad, N. F., & Ragowsky, A. (2008). Establishing Trust in Electronic Commerce Through Online Word of Mouth: An Examination Across Genders. Journal of Management Informations Systems, 24(4), 101-112.

2.

Baty, J. B., & Le, R. M.(1995). Enhancing the Vend/Customer Dialectic in Electronic Shopping, Journal of Management Information System, 1(4), 35-38.

3.

Bone, F. P. (1992). Determinants Of Word-Of-Mouth Communications During Product Consumption, Advances in Consumer Research, 19(1), 579-583.

4.

Bronjarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The Role of Consumer‘Intuitions in Inference Making, Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 393-407.

5.

Brown, J. J., & Peter, H. R. (1987). Social Ties And Word-OfMouth Referral Behavior, Journal Of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350-362.

6.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

7.

Cannoy, S. D., & Salam, A. E. (2010). A Framework for Health Care Information Assurance Policy and Compliance. Communications of the ACM, 53(3), 126-131.

8.

Cheung, M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The Impact of Electronic Word of Mouth in Online Consumer-Opinion Platforms. Decison Support Systems, 53, 218-225.

9.

Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. J. (2011). Determinants Of Consumer Engagement In Electronic Word-Of-Mouth (Ewom) In Social Networking Sites. International Journal Of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.

10.

Cohen, S., & Hoberman, H. M. (1983). Positve Events and Social Suports as Bufers of Life Change Stres. Journal of Aplied Social Psycholgy, 13(2), 9-125.

11.

Chung, J. B. (2017). Internet Shopping Optimization Problem With Delivery Constraints. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(2), 15-20

12.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

13.

De Bont, C. J. P. M., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (1995). The Effects of Product Expertise on Consumer Evaluation of New-Product Concepts. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(4), 599-615.

14.

Deighton, J., & Kent, G. (1995). Marketing and Seduction:Building Exchange Relationships by Managing Social Consensus. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 660-676.

15.

Dinet, J., Chevalier, A., & Tricot, A. (2012). Information Search Activity : An Overview. Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 62(2), 49-62.

16.

Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory, 1(6), 201-233.

17.

Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Moticate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472-482.

18.

Han, S. S. (2018). Role of Online Social Decisions When Purchasing NP: The Moderating Effect of NP Innovation. Journal of Distribution Science, 16(7), 57-65.

19.

Han, S. S. (2019). Effect of Ommi-channel Propensity, WOM Expectation, Category Knowledge and Social Decision on Consideration Set: Focused on On-line Shopping. Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 22(3), 125-133.

20.

Habibollah, J., Ali, I., & Sorayya B. B. (2014). New Clothing Adoption in an Islamic Market. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 15(4), 13-22.

21.

Hoeffler, S. (2003). Measuring Preferences for Really New Products. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 406-420.

22.

Huang, M., Cai, F., Alex, S. L. T., & Zhou, N. (2011). Making Your Online Voice Loud: the Critical Role of WOM Information. European Journal of Marketing, 45(7/8), 1277-1297.

23.

Ibarra, H. (1997), Paving an Alternative Route: Gender Differences in Managerial Networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 91-102.

24.

Jaakko, P., Hannu, S., Mark T. S., & Mika, Y. (2017). From Electronic WOM to Social eWOM: Bridging the Trust Deficit. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 25(3), 340-356.

25.

Jillian C. S., Geoffrey, N., & Soutar, T. M. (2008). Factors Influencing Word of Mouth Effectiveness: Receiver Perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 42(3/4), 344-364.

26.

Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H. & Iwan, S. (2016). Marketing 4.0. Hoboken, NJ: Wilet.

27.

Lee, D. K., & Na, T. K. (2016). The Effect of Source Credibility about Online Restaurant Information on Information Usefulness, Acceptance of e-WOM and Behavior Intention. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 30(1), 261-274.

28.

Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic Word of Mouth in Hospitality and Tourism Management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458-468

29.

Morrison, E. W. (2002). Newcomers Relationships: The Role of Social Network Ties During Socialization. The Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1149-1160.

30.

Oh, Y. K. (2017). The Impact of Initial eWOM Growth on the Sales in Movie Distribution. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(9), 85-93

31.

Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are You Telling Me This? An Examination Into Negative Consumer Reviews on The Web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 76-94.

32.

Sisors, J. Z., & Bumba, L. (1995). Advertisng Media Planing (5th ed). Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.

33.

Steffes, M. S., & Lawrence, E. B. (2009). Social Ties and Online Word of Mouth. Internet Research, 19(1), 42-59.

34.

Tan, W. K. (2017). The Effect of Temporal Psychological Distance On Reliance On Word-Of-Mouth For Information About Destination Image Attributes. Behavior and Information Technology, 36(11), 1101-1110.

35.

Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (1998). Social Structures A Network Approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

36.

Van Der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors Influencing the Usage of Websites: the Case of a Generic Portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6), 541-549.

37.

Zao, Y., & Kim, S. B. (2018). Effect of Directionality and Type of Online e-WOM on Purchase Intention and Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Service Convergent with an Humanities and Sociology, 8(1), 121-131.

The Journal of Distribution Science